Tjaart Jurgens Maré Doctor Legum Universiteit van die Vrystaat
Tjaart Jurgens Maré Doctor Legum Universiteit van die Vrystaat Tjaart Jurgens Maré Doctor Legum Universiteit van die Vrystaat
780 2006(2) SA 32 (T) Paragraaf 24. 381 Die regter het vervolgens die bepalings van Artikel 4 van PAJA oorweeg, en beslis dat, alhoewel die administrateur wat die administratiewe handeling uitvoer wat die regte van die publiek nadelig kan beïnvloed en hy/sy die stappe moet oorweeg om prosedurele billikheid te bewerkstellig, die vereistes van die Wet wel in dié geval vereis dat deelname van die publiek sekerlik moes plaasvind. Oor Artikel 4(1) van PAJA is die hof die volgende mening toegedaan : “I may well add that in terms of section 4(1) of PAJA where an administrative action adversely affects the rights of the public, an administrator, being the first respondent in the instant case, in order to give effect to the right to procedurally fair administrative action, must decide, amongst other things, whether to hold a public inquiry in terms of subsection 2 or to follow a notice and comment procedure in terms of subsection (3) or where the administrator is empowered by any enabling provision to follow a procedure which is fair but different, to follow that procedure. However, because of the nature of the matter, in my view, the first respondent and correctly so, considered consultation. In a way, subsections (3) and (4) of section 10 envisage some sort of participation by interested or aggrieved parties.” 780 Na aanleiding van die meriete van die saak was die hof van mening dat voldoende konsultasie met die publiek plaasgevind het en dat die aansoek om die naamsverandering ter syde te stel, van die hand gewys word.
Hoofstuk 5 REDES VIR ʼn ADMINISTRATIEWE HANDELING 1. DIE VERSKAFFING VAN REDES: ʼn NUWE WENDING 382 ʼn Wetgewende reg tot die verskaffing van redes vir ʼn administratiewe handeling wat geneem word, is ʼn nuwe wending in die Suid-Afrikaanse Administratiefreg. Hierdie reg is eerstens in 1994 na vore gebring deur Artikel 24(1C) van die Interim-Grondwet. Dit word tans vervat in Artikel 33(2) van die Finale-Grondwet. Artikel 5 van PAJA maak nou voorsiening vir die verskaffing van “voldoende redes”, waar dit aangevra word deur ʼn persoon wie se regte wesentlik en nadelig geraak is deur die administratiewe handeling. Dit is die eerste keer dat ʼn algemene statutêre verpligting geplaas word op die administrateur om redes te verskaf vir besluite geneem, alhoewel sekere ander wetgewing ook in die verlede van administrateurs verlang het om redes te verskaf. 781 Rakende die verskaffing van redes bepaal Artikel 5 van PAJA soos volg : “5 (1) Any person whose rights have been materially and adversely affected by administrative action and who has not been given reasons for the action may, within 90 days after the date on which that person became aware of the action or might reasonably have been expected to have become aware of the action, request that the Administrator concerned furnish written reasons for the action. (2) The Administrator to whom the request is made must, within 90 days after receiving the request give that person adequate reasons in writing for the administrative action. (3) If an administrator fails to furnish adequate reasons for an administrative action, it must, subject to subsection (4) and in the absence of proof to the contrary, be presumed in any proceedings for judicial review that the administrative action was taken without good reason. (4) (a) An administrator may depart from the requirement to furnish adequate reasons if it is reasonable and justifiable in the circumstances, and must forthwith inform the person making the request of such departure. (b) In determining whether a departure as contemplated in paragraph (a) is reasonable and justifiable, an administrator must take in account all relevant factors, including – (i) the objects of the empowering provision; (ii) the nature, purpose and likely effect of the administrative action concerned; (iii) the nature and the extent of the departure; 781 Sien Baxter, 1984:226 voetnoot 239 vir verskeie voorbeelde van hierdie wetgewing.
- Page 341 and 342: 330 Daar is dus geen twyfel nie dat
- Page 343 and 344: 726 Currie en Klaaren, 2001:82. 332
- Page 345 and 346: 334 (cc) Die uitvoerende bevoegdhed
- Page 347 and 348: 336 laasgenoemde geval sal hierdie
- Page 349 and 350: 338 Grondwet gedefinieer word nie,
- Page 351 and 352: 340 • Die Premier se funksies ten
- Page 353 and 354: 342 maak van by-wette ten opsigte v
- Page 355 and 356: 344 In die Volkswagen-saak het die
- Page 357 and 358: 346 en die blatante uitsluiting daa
- Page 359 and 360: provincial, regional and local - an
- Page 361 and 362: 350 Uit die bogemelde gewysdes, is
- Page 363 and 364: (b) In order to give effect to the
- Page 365 and 366: 354 begrip te herdefinieer, om sodo
- Page 367 and 368: 356 2.2.3 ʼn DUIDELIKE UITEENSETTIN
- Page 369 and 370: 358 Dit mag andersins ook onbillik
- Page 371 and 372: 360 nakom. Terwyl Artikel 3(2)(b)(b
- Page 373 and 374: 759 2003 JOL 11026 (TK). 760 1948(3
- Page 375 and 376: 765 2005(3) SA 25 (A). “In determ
- Page 377 and 378: 366 applikant geregtig was op prose
- Page 379 and 380: (3) If an administrator decides to
- Page 381 and 382: 773 1991(4) SA 1 (A). 370 Currie en
- Page 383 and 384: 372 dat aan ʼn sekere voorgeskrewe
- Page 385 and 386: 2. KENNISGEWING EN KOMMENTAAR 374 p
- Page 387 and 388: 376 hierdie vereiste egter oorbodig
- Page 389 and 390: 378 Gesien in die lig van die belan
- Page 391: 777 2005(3) SA 156 (C). 778 2006(2)
- Page 395 and 396: Die waardes wat die verskaffing van
- Page 397 and 398: 386 Hoe openbaar moet die voor-vers
- Page 399 and 400: 388 word. Die vasgestelde-tydperkve
- Page 401 and 402: 390 het. In hierdie saak oor die re
- Page 403 and 404: 392 moet dra, so ʼn lys te publisee
- Page 405 and 406: 394 Grondwet, wat handel oor die ve
- Page 407 and 408: 396 In Maharaj v Chairman, Liquor L
- Page 409 and 410: 398 tendervoorwaarde, wat bepaal da
- Page 411 and 412: 400 maak vir die hersiening op gron
- Page 413 and 414: purportedly taken, is so unreasonab
- Page 415 and 416: 404 Die betrokke Wet (en die Grond
- Page 417 and 418: 406 ʼn Padvervoerraad wat gemagtig
- Page 419 and 420: 408 bevoegdheid is, wanneer die hoo
- Page 421 and 422: 410 nie. Die tweede respondent het
- Page 423 and 424: 412 4 van die Wet op die Raad op Ta
- Page 425 and 426: 414 Die toepassing van Artikel 6(2)
- Page 427 and 428: “Indien dit in enige stadium nada
- Page 429 and 430: 841 2004(1) SA 396 (SCA). 842 2004(
- Page 431 and 432: Hoe vertolk die howe die grondwetli
- Page 433 and 434: 422 (c) Die reg op prosedureel bill
- Page 435 and 436: 858 2003(4) SA 160 (T). 424 dit die
- Page 437 and 438: 426 Die hof het PAJA nie hier oorwe
- Page 439 and 440: 428 Ongeoorloofde doel sal nie ter
- Page 441 and 442: 430 In Pretoria City Council v Meer
Hoofstuk 5<br />
REDES VIR ʼn ADMINISTRATIEWE HANDELING<br />
1. DIE VERSKAFFING VAN REDES: ʼn NUWE WENDING<br />
382<br />
ʼn Wetgewende reg tot <strong>die</strong> verskaffing <strong>van</strong> redes vir ʼn administratiewe handeling wat<br />
geneem word, is ʼn nuwe wending in <strong>die</strong> Suid-Afrikaanse Administratiefreg. Hier<strong>die</strong> reg is<br />
eerstens in 1994 na vore gebring deur Artikel 24(1C) <strong>van</strong> <strong>die</strong> Interim-Grondwet. Dit word<br />
tans vervat in Artikel 33(2) <strong>van</strong> <strong>die</strong> Finale-Grondwet. Artikel 5 <strong>van</strong> PAJA maak nou<br />
voorsiening vir <strong>die</strong> verskaffing <strong>van</strong> “voldoende redes”, waar dit aangevra word deur ʼn<br />
persoon wie se regte wesentlik en nadelig geraak is deur <strong>die</strong> administratiewe handeling.<br />
Dit is <strong>die</strong> eerste keer dat ʼn algemene statutêre verpligting geplaas word op <strong>die</strong><br />
administrateur om redes te verskaf vir besluite geneem, alhoewel sekere ander wetgewing<br />
ook in <strong>die</strong> verlede <strong>van</strong> administrateurs verlang het om redes te verskaf. 781<br />
Rakende <strong>die</strong> verskaffing <strong>van</strong> redes bepaal Artikel 5 <strong>van</strong> PAJA soos volg :<br />
“5 (1) Any person whose rights have been materially and adversely affected by<br />
administrative action and who has not been given reasons for the action may,<br />
within 90 days after the date on which that person became aware of the<br />
action or might reasonably have been expected to have become aware of the<br />
action, request that the Administrator concerned furnish written reasons for<br />
the action.<br />
(2) The Administrator to whom the request is made must, within 90 days after<br />
receiving the request give that person adequate reasons in writing for the<br />
administrative action.<br />
(3) If an administrator fails to furnish adequate reasons for an administrative<br />
action, it must, subject to subsection (4) and in the absence of proof to the<br />
contrary, be presumed in any proceedings for judicial review that the<br />
administrative action was taken without good reason.<br />
(4) (a) An administrator may depart from the requirement to furnish adequate<br />
reasons if it is reasonable and justifiable in the circumstances, and must<br />
forthwith inform the person making the request of such departure.<br />
(b) In determining whether a departure as contemplated in paragraph (a) is<br />
reasonable and justifiable, an administrator must take in account all<br />
rele<strong>van</strong>t factors, including –<br />
(i) the objects of the empowering provision;<br />
(ii) the nature, purpose and likely effect of the administrative action<br />
concerned;<br />
(iii) the nature and the extent of the departure;<br />
781 Sien Baxter, 1984:226 voetnoot 239 vir verskeie voorbeelde <strong>van</strong> hier<strong>die</strong> wetgewing.