deurlopende formatiewe assessering in skriftelike stelwerk in graad 5
deurlopende formatiewe assessering in skriftelike stelwerk in graad 5 deurlopende formatiewe assessering in skriftelike stelwerk in graad 5
Martin, K. Issues of Teaching and Learning. Vol 5. Issue 6. July 1999. http: // www. catl. Uwa. Edu. Au./Newsletter /Issue 0599/ Index. Html University of Western Australia, Centre for Staff Development. Mangelsdorf, K. 1992. Peer reviews in ESL Composition Classroom: What Do the Students Think. In English Language Teaching Journal. 46 (3):274-284. McLagan & Nell, C. 1995. The Age of Participation: New Governance for the Workplace and the World. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers. McNiff, J. 1988. Action Research: Principles and Practice. Chatham: Mackays of Chatham. McNiff, J. 1992. Action Research: Principles and Practice. (Reprint) New York: Routledge. McTighe, J. & Ferrara, S. 1994. Assessing Learning in the Classroom. Washington, D.C. National Forum on Assessment. In R. Blum & J. Arter (eds.) A Handbook for Student Performance Assessment in a Era of Restructuring. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia, 1-5: 1-9. McCown, R., Driscol, M. & Roop, P. 1996. Educational Psychology: a Learning-Centred Approach to Classroom Practice. 2nd Edition. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon. McCuen Jo Ray & Winkler, Anthony C. 1987. Rewriting Writing: A Rhetoric and Handbook. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc. McKenzie, L. & G. Tomkins. 1984. Evaluating Students Writing: A Process Approach. Journal of Teaching Writing, 3 (2), Fall. Melton, D. 1997. You Can Improve Your Student’s Writing Skills. USA: Landmark Edition, Inc. Messerschmidt, J. 2003. The Introduction of Co-operative Learning to Grade 4 Learners in some Disadvantaged Schools. In South African Journal of Education. 23(2): 107-112. 122
Morgan, C., King, R., Weisz, J., & Schopler. 1986. Introduction to psychology (7 th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill. Möller, A. 1982. Aksienavorsing: Konsekwensies vir die praktyk. Pedagogiek Joernaal. Vol. 3. Universiteit van Pretoria. Mooko (2001. Tydskrif vir Taalonderrig 35 (2&3): 168. Morrow, W. 1989. Chains of Thought. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers. Murray, D. 1968. A Writer Teaches Writing: a Practical Method of Teaching Composition. Boston: Houghton Muffin Company. Murray, D. 1978. Internal Revision: A Process of Discovery. In Cooper, Charles, R. & Lee Odell. Research on Composing Points of Departure NCTE, Urbana, Illinois. Murray, D. 1980. Writing as a Process: How Writing Finds Its Own Meaning. In Donovan, T. R & McClelland, Ben W. Eight Approaches to Teaching Composition. NCTE, Urbana, Illinois. Murray, D. 1990. Read to Write: A Writing Process Reader. United States of America: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc. Nasionale Onderwysbeleid, Wet 9/ 1967 Statute van Suid-Afrika, Binder 15-Onderwys. Nakabugo, M. 1999. Assessment in Curriculum 2005. In South African Journal of Education. NCTE Joint Task Force on Assessment. 2002. Standards for the Assessment of Reading and Writing. Website: http. www. ncte. org. html. Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J.M. 1993. Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments. In Revising their Drafts? TESOL QUARTERLY 27 (1): 135-141. Nunan, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. UK: Prentice- Hall. 123
- Page 83 and 84: neem deel aan hul eie leer en leerk
- Page 85 and 86: Ek stem saam met Murray (1978) en D
- Page 87 and 88: Tabel 1: Rangskik die sinne Die vol
- Page 89 and 90: Kriteria en ‘n kontrolelys is vir
- Page 91 and 92: Nadat portuurassessering toegepas w
- Page 93 and 94: skrywer aan leser wil oordra. Sonde
- Page 95 and 96: Dit wat op jou paragraaf van toepas
- Page 97 and 98: gebeur nie. Daar was ‘n gemaklike
- Page 99 and 100: 4 = leerder se prestasie het die ve
- Page 101 and 102: met die hulp van kontrolelyste en l
- Page 103 and 104: gelewer het nie, as hulle nie toege
- Page 105 and 106: Die rede hoekom ons akwariums toe g
- Page 107 and 108: Wanneer ons as leerkragte ons kurri
- Page 109 and 110: HOOFSTUK 5 OPSOMMING VAN BEVINDINGS
- Page 111 and 112: hulle deur middel van onlangse navo
- Page 113 and 114: probleem aangespreek. Hierdie probl
- Page 115 and 116: klas en ek het die geleentheid geha
- Page 117 and 118: leerders aanmoedig ten opsigte van
- Page 119 and 120: 5.7.2 Leerkragte behoort die leerom
- Page 121 and 122: moet assessering ontwikkelend wees,
- Page 123 and 124: Beach, R. 1979. The Effects of Betw
- Page 125 and 126: Comstock, D. 1982. A Method for Cri
- Page 127 and 128: Du Toit, P. & W. Smith-Müller. 200
- Page 129 and 130: Frost, P. 2002. ‘Principles of th
- Page 131 and 132: Hlope, C. 1998. Improvisation of Hu
- Page 133: Knoblauch, C.H. & L. Brannon. 1984.
- Page 137 and 138: Pretorius, S. 1999. Uitkomsgerigte
- Page 139 and 140: Siebörger, R. & Macintosh, H. 1998
- Page 141 and 142: Turnstall, P. and Gipps, C.V. 1996.
- Page 143 and 144: Witte, P. 1989. Revising, Composing
- Page 145 and 146: 1.Die kleintjies van die diere word
- Page 147 and 148: 135
Morgan, C., K<strong>in</strong>g, R., Weisz, J., & Schopler. 1986. Introduction to psychology (7 th ed.) New<br />
York: McGraw-Hill.<br />
Möller, A. 1982. Aksienavors<strong>in</strong>g: Konsekwensies vir die praktyk. Pedagogiek Joernaal.<br />
Vol. 3. Universiteit van Pretoria.<br />
Mooko (2001. Tydskrif vir Taalonderrig 35 (2&3): 168.<br />
Morrow, W. 1989. Cha<strong>in</strong>s of Thought. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers.<br />
Murray, D. 1968. A Writer Teaches Writ<strong>in</strong>g: a Practical Method of Teach<strong>in</strong>g Composition.<br />
Boston: Houghton Muff<strong>in</strong> Company.<br />
Murray, D. 1978. Internal Revision: A Process of Discovery. In Cooper, Charles, R. & Lee<br />
Odell. Research on Compos<strong>in</strong>g Po<strong>in</strong>ts of Departure NCTE, Urbana, Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.<br />
Murray, D. 1980. Writ<strong>in</strong>g as a Process: How Writ<strong>in</strong>g F<strong>in</strong>ds Its Own Mean<strong>in</strong>g. In Donovan, T.<br />
R & McClelland, Ben W. Eight Approaches to Teach<strong>in</strong>g Composition. NCTE, Urbana,<br />
Ill<strong>in</strong>ois.<br />
Murray, D. 1990. Read to Write: A Writ<strong>in</strong>g Process Reader. United States of America: Holt,<br />
R<strong>in</strong>ehart and W<strong>in</strong>ston, Inc.<br />
Nasionale Onderwysbeleid, Wet 9/ 1967 Statute van Suid-Afrika, B<strong>in</strong>der 15-Onderwys.<br />
Nakabugo, M. 1999. Assessment <strong>in</strong> Curriculum 2005. In South African Journal of Education.<br />
NCTE Jo<strong>in</strong>t Task Force on Assessment. 2002. Standards for the Assessment of Read<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Writ<strong>in</strong>g. Website: http. www. ncte. org. html.<br />
Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J.M. 1993. Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer<br />
Comments. In Revis<strong>in</strong>g their Drafts? TESOL QUARTERLY 27 (1): 135-141.<br />
Nunan, D. 1991. Language Teach<strong>in</strong>g Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. UK: Prentice-<br />
Hall.<br />
123
Change language