01.05.2013 Views

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>LitNet</strong> Akademies Jaargang 9(2), Augustus 2012<br />

Long, M.H. en C.J. Doughty (reds.). 2009. The handbook of language <strong>te</strong>ach<strong>in</strong>g. Chiches<strong>te</strong>r:<br />

Wiley-Blackwell<br />

Loschky, L. en R. Bley-Vr<strong>om</strong>an. 1993. Grammar and task-based methodology. In Crookes en<br />

Gass (reds.) 1993.<br />

Michel, M.C. 2011. Cognitive and <strong>in</strong><strong>te</strong>ractive aspects of task-based performance <strong>in</strong> Dutch as<br />

a second language. Ois<strong>te</strong>rwijk: Uitgeverij BOXPress.<br />

Norris, J.M. en L. Or<strong>te</strong>ga. 2009. Measurement for understand<strong>in</strong>g: An organic approach to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>om</strong>plexity, accuracy, and fluency <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>struc<strong>te</strong>d SLA. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics,<br />

30(4):555–78.<br />

Nunan, D. 2010. Task-based language <strong>te</strong>ach<strong>in</strong>g. Londen: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Or<strong>te</strong>ga, L. 2003. Syntactic c<strong>om</strong>plexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A<br />

research synthesis of college-level L2 writ<strong>in</strong>g. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 24(4):492–518.<br />

Pica, T., R. Kanagy en J. Falodun. 1993. Choos<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g c<strong>om</strong>munication tasks for second<br />

language <strong>in</strong>struction. In Crookes en Gass (reds.) 1993.<br />

Pütz, M. en L. Sicola (reds.). 2010. Cognitive process<strong>in</strong>g and second language acquisition:<br />

Inside the learner’s m<strong>in</strong>d. Ams<strong>te</strong>rdam en Philadelphia: John Benjam<strong>in</strong>s Publish<strong>in</strong>g C<strong>om</strong>pany.<br />

Rob<strong>in</strong>son, P. 1998. Sta<strong>te</strong> of the art: SLA theory and second language syllabus design. The<br />

Language Teacher Onl<strong>in</strong>e, 22(4). (12 Maart 2009 geraadpleeg).<br />

Rob<strong>in</strong>son, P. (red.). 2001a. Cognition and second language <strong>in</strong>struction. Cambridge:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

—. 2001b. Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude c<strong>om</strong>plexes and learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

conditions <strong>in</strong> second language learn<strong>in</strong>g. Second Language Research, 17(4):368–92.<br />

—. 2001c. Task c<strong>om</strong>plexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework<br />

for exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g task <strong>in</strong>fluences on SLA. In Rob<strong>in</strong>son (red.) 2001a.<br />

—. 2001d. Task c<strong>om</strong>plexity, task difficulty, and task production: Explor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>te</strong>ractions <strong>in</strong> a<br />

c<strong>om</strong>ponential framework. Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics, 22(1):27–57.<br />

—. 2003. The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learn<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Second Language Stu<strong>die</strong>s, 21(2):45–105.<br />

—. 2005. Cognitive c<strong>om</strong>plexity and task sequenc<strong>in</strong>g: Stu<strong>die</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a c<strong>om</strong>ponential framework<br />

for second language task design. In<strong>te</strong>rnational Review of Applied L<strong>in</strong>guistics <strong>in</strong> Language<br />

<strong>te</strong>ach<strong>in</strong>g, 43(1):1–32.<br />

650

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!