01.05.2013 Views

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>LitNet</strong> Akademies Jaargang 9(2), Augustus 2012<br />

34 Weaver e.a. (reds.) (2011:760). Sien i.v.m. <strong>die</strong> toepass<strong>in</strong>g van verskillende standaarde op<br />

verskillende soor<strong>te</strong> differensiër<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>die</strong> Duitse reg, Grünberger (2012:97).<br />

35 Grondwet art. 36(1)(a) en (c).<br />

36 1995 12 BCLR 1579 (KH), 1996 1 SA 388 (KH) par. 18 (kursiver<strong>in</strong>g bygevoeg). Sien ook<br />

Christian Education SA v M<strong>in</strong>is<strong>te</strong>r of Education 2000 10 BCLR 1051 (KH) par. 512; S v<br />

Lawrence; S v Negal; S v Solberg 1997 10 BCLR 1348 (KH), 1997 4 SA 1176 (KH) par.<br />

168.<br />

37 Sien par. 5 stap 3 <strong>hier</strong> onder.<br />

38<br />

Joos<strong>te</strong> v Score Supermarket Trad<strong>in</strong>g (Pty) Ltd 1999 2 BCLR 139 (KH), 1999 2 SA 1 (KH)<br />

par. 16.<br />

39 Gunther (1992:276).<br />

40 411 U.S. 1 (1973).<br />

41 Sien Rau<strong>te</strong>nbach (2011, par 1A53).<br />

42 Sien par. 4.3 <strong>hier</strong> onder.<br />

43 S v Zuma 1995 4 BCLR 401 (KH), 1995 2 SA 642 (KH) par. 21. Vir meer onlangse<br />

uitsprake <strong>hier</strong>oor, sien Director of Public Prosecutions, Transvaal v M<strong>in</strong>is<strong>te</strong>r for Justice and<br />

Constitutional Development 2009 7 BCLR 673 (KH), 2009 4 SA 222 (KH) par. 41; Johnc<strong>om</strong><br />

Media Investments Ltd v M 2009 8 BCLR 751 (KH), 2009 4 SA 7 (KH) par. 25.<br />

44 Vir meer besonderhede oor <strong>die</strong> aard van <strong>die</strong> bewyslas <strong>in</strong> handveslitigasie, sien M<strong>in</strong>is<strong>te</strong>r of<br />

H<strong>om</strong>e Affairs v National Institu<strong>te</strong> for Crime Prevention (NICRO) 2004 5 BCLR 445 (KH),<br />

2005 3 SA 280 (KH) par. 34–6.<br />

45 1995 10 BCLR 1382 (KH), 1995 4 SA 631 (KH) par. 45–6.<br />

46 Harksen v Lane 1997 11 BCLR 1489 (KH), 1998 1 SA 300 (KH) par. 53. My vertal<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

47 Harksen v Lane 1997 11 BCLR 1489 (KH), 1998 1 SA 300 (KH) par. 51; President of the<br />

RSA v Hugo 1997 6 BCLR 708 (KH), 1997 4 SA 1 (KH) par. 42–3.<br />

48 Krüger (2011:478, 512).<br />

49 Die volgende s<strong>te</strong>ll<strong>in</strong>g van Braveman, Banks en Smolla (2005:572) k<strong>om</strong> <strong>in</strong> byna alle<br />

Amerikaanse staatsreghandboeke voor: “By their very nature, nearly all laws classify,<br />

impos<strong>in</strong>g obligations or conferr<strong>in</strong>g benefits on s<strong>om</strong>e but not others.”<br />

50 Die verwys<strong>in</strong>g na “eenvoudigs<strong>te</strong> vorm” is belangrik, want <strong>in</strong> <strong>die</strong> li<strong>te</strong>ratuur word s<strong>om</strong>s<br />

gemeld dat <strong>die</strong> rasionele-verband-toets verskillende vorme kan hê wat op ’n glyskaal van heel<br />

lig tot streng geplaas kan word. Sien Price (2010:586–9); Brand (2003:40); Weaver e.a.<br />

(reds.) (2011:762).<br />

261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!