01.05.2013 Views

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

Klik hier om die volledige joernaal in PDF-formaat af te laai - LitNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>LitNet</strong> Akademies Jaargang 9 (2), April 2012<br />

Two Lat<strong>in</strong> squares L and L ′ are orthogonal if the n 2 ordered pairs (L(i, j),L ′ (i, j)) are all dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

as i, j ∈ Zn vary. The transpose of a Lat<strong>in</strong> square L, deno<strong>te</strong>d by L T , is def<strong>in</strong>ed as <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary matrix sense and L is symmetric if L = L T . If a Lat<strong>in</strong> square L is orthogonal to its<br />

transpose, then L is called a self-orthogonal Lat<strong>in</strong> square (SOLS). If a SOLS L is orthogonal<br />

to a symmetric Lat<strong>in</strong> square S, then the pair (L,S) forms a SOLS with a symmetric orthogonal<br />

ma<strong>te</strong> (SOLSSOM). If n is even, a SOLSSOM (L,S) is unipo<strong>te</strong>nt if S is unipo<strong>te</strong>nt. Furthermore,<br />

a SOLSSOM S = (L,S) is standard if L is idempo<strong>te</strong>nt and if S is idempo<strong>te</strong>nt (for odd n) or<br />

reduced (for even n).<br />

It is known that a SOLSSOM of order n exists for any positive <strong>in</strong><strong>te</strong>ger n = 1,2,3,6,10, 14, while<br />

a SOLSSOM of order n does not exist if n = 1,2,3,6 (at the time of writ<strong>in</strong>g this paper the cases<br />

of orders n = 10,14 were still undecided). Unipo<strong>te</strong>nt SOLSSOMs have useful applications <strong>in</strong><br />

the schedul<strong>in</strong>g of spouse-avoid<strong>in</strong>g mixed-doubles round-rob<strong>in</strong> <strong>te</strong>nnis tournaments [5, 9] and<br />

Whist tournaments [10, §III.5.10].<br />

Two SOLSSOMs S = (L,S) and S ′ = (L ′ ,S ′ ) are (row, column)-paratopic if there exists a<br />

quadruple α = (p,ℓ,s,t) ∈ S 3 n × S2 of permutations (where Sn is the symmetric group of order<br />

n), called a (row, column)-paratopism mapp<strong>in</strong>g S to S ′ , such that<br />

ℓ(L(i, j)) =<br />

L ′ (p(i), p( j)) if t(0) = 0,<br />

L ′ (p( j), p(i)) if t(0) = 1,<br />

and s(S(i, j)) = S ′ (p(i), p( j)). Hence p is a permutation applied to the rows and columns of<br />

L and S, and ℓ is a permutation applied to the symbols of L. Furthermore, s is a permutation<br />

applied to the symbols of S, while t permu<strong>te</strong>s the roles of the rows and columns of L (i.e.<br />

possibly achieves a switch between L and L T ). The notation S ′ = S α is henceforth used to<br />

deno<strong>te</strong> the fact that α transforms S <strong>in</strong>to S ′ . If S = S α , then α is called a (row, column)autoparatopism<br />

of S . If α = (p,ℓ,s,t) is a (row, column)-paratopism for which p = ℓ = s,<br />

then α is called a transpose-is<strong>om</strong>orphism, simply deno<strong>te</strong>d by (p,t) ∈ Sn × S2, <strong>in</strong> which case<br />

S and S α are said to be transpose-is<strong>om</strong>orphic. If S α = S <strong>in</strong> this case, then α is called a<br />

transpose-aut<strong>om</strong>orphism of S .<br />

The notions of a (row, column)-paratopism and a transpose-is<strong>om</strong>orphism may be def<strong>in</strong>ed similarly<br />

for SOLS or for symmetric Lat<strong>in</strong> squares (<strong>in</strong>dividually). For <strong>in</strong>stance, if α = (p,ℓ,s,t) is a<br />

(row, column)-paratopism act<strong>in</strong>g on a SOLSSOM S = (L,S), then (p,ℓ,t) is a (row, column)paratopism<br />

act<strong>in</strong>g on L, while (p,s) is a (row, column)-paratopism act<strong>in</strong>g on S.<br />

Various classes of SOLS of orders 4 n 10 have been enumera<strong>te</strong>d by Graham and Roberts<br />

[11] and by Burger et al. [8, 7], and unipo<strong>te</strong>nt symmetric Lat<strong>in</strong> squares have also been enumera<strong>te</strong>d<br />

<strong>in</strong> the form of one-factorisations of the c<strong>om</strong>ple<strong>te</strong> graph [2]. A problem that has not yet<br />

been addressed <strong>in</strong> the li<strong>te</strong>rature yet is that of the enumeration of SOLSSOMs. The availability<br />

of exhaustive repositories for non-(row,column)-paratopic symmetric Lat<strong>in</strong> squares <strong>in</strong> [13] and<br />

non-transpose-is<strong>om</strong>orphic SOLS <strong>in</strong> [6] provide two different methods of generat<strong>in</strong>g SOLSS-<br />

OMs, namely f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, for each SOLS <strong>in</strong> the repository, its non-(row,column)-paratopic symmetric<br />

orthogonal ma<strong>te</strong>s, or f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, for each symmetric Lat<strong>in</strong> square, its non-(row,column)paratopic<br />

SOLS-ma<strong>te</strong>s.<br />

In this paper we adopt both the enumeration methods described above (implemen<strong>te</strong>d as backtrack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tree searches) with a view to enumerat<strong>in</strong>g dist<strong>in</strong>ct SOLSSOMs, standard SOLSS-<br />

OMs, transpose-is<strong>om</strong>orphism classes of SOLSSOMs, and (row, column)-paratopism classes of<br />

SOLSSOMs up to order 10, thereby also provid<strong>in</strong>g a means for validat<strong>in</strong>g our results. The<br />

numerical results obta<strong>in</strong>ed are summarised <strong>in</strong> Table 1. An important conclusion fr<strong>om</strong> these<br />

enumeration results is that there is no SOLSSOM of order 10; this settles a 34-year-old stan-<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!