saturs - Latvijas LauksaimniecÄ«bas universitÄte

More documents

Recommendations

Info

S. Bliznikas et al. Efficiency of Sweet Lupin and Faba Bean Seeds in Diets for Lactating Dairy CowsUtilization and balance of nitrogen, calcium and phosphorusTable 3ItemNitrogenBalance± gN absorption, % of N intakeN retained, % of N intakeN retained, % of N digestedN milk productive:% of N intake% of N digestedGroupSoya Lupin Faba bean-0.85±8.72 +3.17±4.63 +6.31±0.6262.1461.5759.6427.1027.4525.8943.6544.5343.4027.3126.6824.3844.0943.3240.86CalciumBalance± g+0.61±0.88+9.58±3.16+12.15±4.05Ca retained, % of Ca intake32.3241.9541.18Ca milk productive, %17.0316.4114.64PhosphorusBalance± g+7.22±0.46+13.44±2.83+15.64±1.90P retained, % of P intake30.2733.5032.25P milk productive, %33.5728.0922.83ItempHTotal nitrogen, mg 100 ml -1Protein nitrogen, mg 100 ml -1Ammonia nitrogen, mg 100 ml -1DAPA, mg 100 ml -1Bacterial nitrogen, mg 100 ml -1* S – soya, L – lupin, B – faba beanBiochemical indicators of the rumen contentsGroupPre-experimentalperiodX ± SDExperimental periodX ± SDS* 7.08±0.08 7.11±0.08L7.05±0.13 7.06±0.08B 7.09±0.09 7.24±0.03S 110.34±4.67 113.92±2.84L 121.58±4.46 108.04±1.45B 102.51±4.78 106.37±2.85S 88.11±2.32 95.80±3.25L 99.42±5.36 92.13±1.07B 85.83±4.32 88.68±2.35S 15.38±1.24 13.45±3.21L 15.43±2.67 15.19±0.86B 12.63±0.58 16.75±0.29S2.36±0.17 2.22±0.05L2.67±0.06 2.26±0.08B 2.40±0.13 2.27±0.07S48.14 45.29L54.47 46.10B 48.96 46.31Table 444 LLU Raksti 12 (308), 2004; 41-46 1-18
S. Bliznikas et al. Efficiency of Sweet Lupin and Faba Bean Seeds in Diets for Lactating Dairy CowsVFA concentration and ratio in the rumen of cowsTable 5ItemGroupPre-experimentalperiodX ± SDExperimental periodX ± SDTotal VFA, mmol 100 ml -1 L9.30±0.57 8.58±0.46S*9.49±0.17 8.79±0.41B 9.37±0.36 8.42±0.50VFA ratio, %:Acetic acidPropionic acidButyric acid*S – soya, L – lupin, B – faba beanS67.78±1.39 68.87±1.56L70.21±1.90 68.84±1.67B 68.71±0.67 70.98±1.32S15.10±0.50 14.71±0.13L14.55±0.42 15.36±1.04B 16.54±0.57 14.76±0.20S12.53±1.43 11.56±0.59L10.91±1.18 11.40±0.36B 9.85±0.59 9.78±0.26The amounts of total and protein nitrogen were lowerduring the experimental period in comparison with thecontrol group (P>0.1) by, respectively, 5.88 and 3.67mg 100 ml -1 in the lupin group and 7.55 and 7.12 mg 100ml -1 in the faba bean group (P>0.1), though the concentrationof ammonia nitrogen has increased by 1.74and 3.30 mg 100 ml -1 , respectively (P>0.1). The reasonfor the increase might have been higher protein solubilityand degradation in the rumen for the experimentaldiets. Analysis of diaminopimelic acid indicated thatreplacement of soyabean oilmeal with lupin or faba beanseeds in compound feeds had no negative influenceon the activity of microbial protein biosynthesis. Microbialnitrogen in the rumen of cows in Control, Experimental1 and 2 groups accounted for, respectively,39.76, 42.67 and 43.54% of total nitrogen.There was no significant difference for carbohydratefermentation in the rumen of cows (Table 5).The quantitative composition of volatile fatty acids(VFA) has changed insignificantly. During the experimentalperiod, acetic acid in the rumen of cows fedbean meal accounted for 70.98% of the total VFA, andthis content was by 2.11–2.14% higher than that inthe rumen of cows fed soyabean meal or lupin meal(P>0.1).Milk production of cowsIt is natural that during the experimental period,milk production of cows in all groups was lower comparedwith the pre-experimental period because all cowsselected for the treatment were in the third month oflactation, i.e. they were at the peak of their lactation(Table 6). It has been observed that milk yield and milkfat content of cows fed lupin and faba bean mealstended to a more significant variation. Milk yields inboth experimental groups were insignificantly lower inGroupPre-experimental period(n=7)Daily milk productionExperimental period(n=7)Table 6Compared with Preexperimentalperiodkg ± % ±Milk fat content, %Soya 3.75±0.14 3.92±0.07 – +0.17LupinFaba bean3.69±0.283.64±0.183.87±0.183.79±0.17––+0.18+0.154% fat corrected milk, kgSoya 20.2±1.46 20.1±1.23 -0.1 -0.49LupinFaba bean19.6±1.5420.0±0.8418.9±1.6419.3±0.64-0.7-0.7-3.57-3.63LLU Raksti 12 (307), 2004; 41-46 1-1845
Page 2: SATURS / CONTENTSDzivnieku valsts p
Page 6 and 7: A. Jemeļjanovs Dzīvnieku valsts p
Page 19 and 20: LLU Raksti 12 (307), 2004; 1-18A. J
Page 21 and 22: Ī. Vītiņa et al. Organiskā lauk
Page 27 and 28: I. H. Konošonoka, A. Jemeļjanovs
Page 33 and 34: B. Ošmane, I. Ramane Enerģētisk
Page 39 and 40: Ī. Vītiņa et al. Kokogļu destil
Page 41 and 42: Ī. Vītiņa et al. Kokogļu destil
Page 43 and 44: S. Bliznikas et al. Efficiency of S
Page 45: S. Bliznikas et al. Efficiency of S
Page 49 and 50: U. Viesturs et al. Solid State Ferm
Page 61 and 62: I. Gemste et al. Smago metālu plū
Page 69 and 70: U. Iljins, I. Ziemelis The Optimiza
Page 79 and 80: V. Zujs, U. Iljins Slaukšanas iek
Page 87 and 88: L. Melece Kvalitātes vadīšanas e
Page 97:
LLU Raksti Nr. 12 (307)Atbildīgais
show all

saturs - Latvijas LauksaimniecÄ«bas universitÄte

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

saturs - Latvijas LauksaimniecÄ«bas universitÄte