2013,1 (62) - Klaipėdos universitetas

GAMYBOS ĮMONIŲ ŽEMIAUSIOJO LYGMENS VADOVŲ TINKAMUMO VERTINIMAS...
Petkevičiūtė, N., Kaminskytė, E. (2003). Vadybinė kompetencija: teorija ir praktika. Pinigų studijos 1: 66–80.
Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizacinės elgsenos pagrindai. Poligrafika ir informatika.
Sakalas, A. (2003). Personalo vadyba. Vilnius: Margi raštai.
Schoonover, S. C. (1997). New Hr Skills Needed For A New Work Environment. Employment Relations Today
(Wiley), Vol. 24, Issue 3: 21–32.
Schuler, R. S., Fulkerson, J. R., Dowling, P. J. (1991). Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Multinational
Corporations. Human Resource Management, Vol. 30, Issue 3: 365–392.
Schultz, P. D., Scultz, S. E. (2006). Psychology and work today: an introduction to industrial and organizational
psichology. Upper Saddle River (N.J.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Seilius, A. (1998). Organizacijų tobulinimo vadyba. KU l-kla.
Seilius, A. (2001). Vadovavimas sprendimų priėmimo procese. KU l-kla.
Seilius, A. ir kt. (2004). Valdymo problemos: teorija ir tendencija. KU l-kla.
Seilius, A., Šimanskienė, L. (2006). Verslo organizacijų valdymas globalizacijos sąlygomis: teorinis požiūris. Verslas:
teorija ir praktika, t. 7, nr. 4: 213–221. Vilnius: Technika.
Staniulienė, S. (2008). Hierarchijos organizacijose: argumentai, alternatyvos, perspektyvos. Organizacijų vadyba:
sisteminiai tyrimai 47: 123–140.
Stankevičienė, A., Lobanova, L., (2006). Personalo vadyba organizacijos sistemoje. Vilnius: Technika.
Šimanskienė, L., Seilius, A. (2009). Komandos: samprata, kūrimas, vadovavimas: monografija. Klaipėda: KU leidykla.
Thomason, S. J., Weeks, M., Bernardin, H. J., Kane, J. (2011). The Differential Focus of Supervisors and Peers in Evaluations
of Managerial Potential. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, March, Vol. 19, Issue 1: 82–97.
Tidikis, R. (2003). Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius.
Vaitkevičius, S., Merkys, G. (2008). Using graphic design of questionnaire to improve the methodological quality of
the survey. III-rd European Congress of Research methodology. Oviedo, Spain.
Vecchio, R. P., Anderson, R. J. (2009). Agreement in Self–Other Ratings of Leader Effectiveness: The role of demographics
and personal. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, Vol. 17, Issue 2: 442–468.
Zakarevičius, P. (2003). Pokyčiai organizacijose: priemonės, valdymas, pasekmės. Kaunas: VDU.
Zakarevičius, P. (2004). Organizacijos kultūra kaip pokyčių priežastys ir pasekmė. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai
tyrimai 30: 201–209. Kaunas: VDU.
Zakarevičius, P., Kvedaravičius, J., Augustauskas, T. (2004). Organizacijų vystymosi paradigma. Kaunas: VDU leidykla.
MANAGEMENT CHAIN EVALUATION OF THE FIRST LEVEL
MANAGERS OF MANUFACTURING COMPANIES
Algirdas Giedraitis, Nijolė Petkevičiūtė
Summary
Evaluation of the first level managers in manufacturing companies is very important.
Mid-level managers (MLM) must be able to recognize suitable first level managers
(FLM) so that valuable FLM could be motivated to stay in company for long period
and improve their professional competence over time.
Successful strategic decision implementation in based on all corporate stakeholders’
actions, their responsibilities and internal interaction system. The most important
link in this interaction system, that links mid-level manager with subordinates
(workers) (SUB) are first level managers. FLM is the link that combines internal elements
of the organization such as goals, objectives and selected technologies. FLM,
together with subordinate workers, achieve manufacturing objectives, provide necessary
information about company processes to the workers as well as informs direct
leadership about the processes inside the organization. Manufacturing productivity,
workers’ attitudes and employee turnover rate depends on FLM performance, behavior
and leadership skills.
85