2013,1 (62) - KlaipÄdos universitetas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Asta Budreikaitė Lately the studies in different countries (Krawczyk, 1990; Brettschneider, Heim, 1997; Sukys, 2001; Oweis, Spinks, 2001; Danish et al., 2003; Klomsten et al., 2004; Moreno Cervelló, 2005) showed that sporting activities can have a positive impact not only on physical but also on spiritual development of adolescents, as sporting activity is one of the most significant factors having a positive impact on the emerging system of values of adolescents, their character formation and others. R. Naul (2008) argues that Olympic values and ethical-moral principles applied in sport activities can help students learn how to behave with integrity in other activities as well. This indicates, that the problem of Olympic education, Olympic ideals and values is also relevant today. However, the scientific literature lacks in–depth, systemic empirical research on the expression and development of moral values that includes all three – cognitive, emotional and behavioural – components using Olympic education as a multifunctional phenomenon, uniting the elements of Olympic culture – the knowledge, behavioural skills and abilities as well as moral attitudes. Therefore it is important to prepare methodics of diagnostics that will help the educators to evaluate the results of pupils’ moral education and this requires comprehensive research of diagnostic moral education, that would have not only pedagogical but also a social meaning (Bitinas, 2010, p. 153). The research aim – to determine adolescents’ (12–13 years) expression of moral values and to verify the effectiveness of Olympic education. The research tasks: 1. To reveal the cognitive level of the expression of adolescents’ moral values. 2. To describe the impact of the empirically tested Olympic education on adolescents’ expression of moral values The research method: scientific literature analysis, abstraction and systemization, description of values, educational experiment, statistical analysis. The organization of the research. The pedagogical experiment was carried out in four schools of secondary education in Lithuania. The length of the research – one year (2008–2009). There was one experimental (E) and one control (C) group in each of the four schools. 126 pupils took part in the pedagogical experiment. 60 sixthformers made up the experimental group and 66 sixth-formers comprised the control group. 59.3 % girls and 40.7 % boys were in E group. The ratio of girls and boys in C group was similar (57.5 % girls and 42.5 % boys). During the experiment there were two measurements made: the first diagnostic I in September of 2008 and the second diagnostic II measurement was made after the implementation of the programme in June of 2009. The most significant changes were observed in the assessment of self-respect and respect, slightly less – obedience and responsibility, and the least – fairness. The results revealed that the teenagers in the experimental group were able to better define the essence of moral values as their level of awareness of values, i.e. complete and very detailed, increased significantly more than that of the control group students. Therefore, value internalisation of teenagers in the experimental group is higher than in the control group. 132
OLIMPINIO UGDYMO ĮTAKA PAAUGLIŲ DOROVINIŲ VERTYBIŲ RAIŠKAI Therefore, it is very important that teenagers’ value system should be constantly enriched by the search for new ideas to achieve the effectiveness of attempted trials, making use of Olympic education. The research results prove that Olympic education could manifest itself as a multifaceted phenomenon that could have a positive impact on adolescents’ moral values both in formal and informal educational settings. 133
Page 1 and 2:
ISSN 1392-3137 KLAIPËDOS UNIVERSIT
Page 3:
PRATARMĖ ISSN 1392-3137. TILTAI, 2
Page 6 and 7:
Lijana Gvaldaitė, Jekaterina Bordu
Page 8 and 9:
Eugenijus Danilevičius Tyrimo tiks
Page 10 and 11:
Eugenijus Danilevičius 1. INTELEKT
Page 12 and 13:
Eugenijus Danilevičius tikoje daž
Page 14 and 15:
Eugenijus Danilevičius selection o
Page 16 and 17:
Eugenijus Danilevičius tion about
Page 18 and 19:
Eugenijus Danilevičius 12
Page 20 and 21:
Trung Quang Dinh, Hilmar Þór Hilm
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Arvydas Guogis, Aušra Šilinskytė
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Tomas Pukšmys (Klein, 2000, S. 52)
Page 48 and 49:
Tomas Pukšmys sės samprata lemia
Page 50 and 51:
Tomas Pukšmys jektą. Prevencinio
Page 52 and 53:
Tomas Pukšmys pasiekiama prevencin
Page 54 and 55:
Tomas Pukšmys objektų specifiką,
Page 56 and 57:
Tomas Pukšmys tinės žalos dydži
Page 58 and 59:
Tomas Pukšmys straipsnio 2 dalyje
Page 60 and 61:
Tomas Pukšmys 3. Lietuvos teismų
Page 62 and 63:
Tomas Pukšmys nature. The specific
Page 64 and 65:
Tomas Pukšmys 58
Page 66 and 67:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula is i
Page 68 and 69:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula 3. E
Page 70 and 71:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula The
Page 72 and 73:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula posi
Page 74 and 75:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula show
Page 76 and 77:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula veri
Page 78 and 79:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula Team
Page 80 and 81:
Anne Koskiniemi, Juha Perttula Plak
Page 82 and 83:
Algirdas Giedraitis, Nijolė Petkev
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89: Algirdas Giedraitis, Nijolė Petkev
Page 94 and 95: Marija Prokopčik, Jurgita Rudžion
Page 112 and 113: Inga Normantė ir INOGATE), skirti
Page 114 and 115: Inga Normantė Straipsnio tikslas -
Page 116 and 117: Inga Normantė priklausomybės nuo
Page 118 and 119: Inga Normantė aspektais, nes energ
Page 120 and 121: Inga Normantė sant visų negandų
Page 122 and 123: Inga Normantė šalis visiškai pri
Page 124 and 125: Inga Normantė The fundamental goal
Page 126 and 127: Inga Normantė 120
Page 128 and 129: Asta Budreikaitė stiliaus perėmim
Page 130 and 131: Asta Budreikaitė (siekiant išsiai
Page 132 and 133: Asta Budreikaitė socialiniam indiv
Page 134 and 135: Asta Budreikaitė Tyrimo duomenų a
Page 136 and 137: Asta Budreikaitė Kardelis, K. (200
Page 140 and 141: Asta Budreikaitė 134
Page 142 and 143: Jūratė Gelžinienė, Ilona Klanie
Page 154 and 155: Lijana Gvaldaitė, Jekaterina Bordu
Page 176 and 177: Valdas Rimkus, Sandra Žemgulienė
Page 188 and 189:
Valdas Rimkus, Sandra Žemgulienė
Page 190 and 191:
Valdas Rimkus, Sandra Žemgulienė
Page 192 and 193:
Genutė Gedvilienė sio turi skirti
Page 194 and 195:
Genutė Gedvilienė ir fiksavimu; b
Page 196 and 197:
Genutė Gedvilienė netolygiai. Ta
Page 198 and 199:
Genutė Gedvilienė Pateiktos korel
Page 200 and 201:
Genutė Gedvilienė Siekiant išsia
Page 202 and 203:
Genutė Gedvilienė control, examin
Page 204 and 205:
Genutė Gedvilienė 198
Page 206 and 207:
Džiuginta Baraldsnes, Astra Vaški
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Irina Matijošaitienė, Ona Samucho
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
deliais kolektyvais įvairiai mąst
Page 236 and 237:
230
Page 238 and 239:
Trung Quang Dinh - magistrantas (so
Page 240 and 241:
Ilona Klanienė - docentė, daktar
Page 242 and 243:
Ona Samuchovienė - magistrė (soci
Page 244 and 245:
ašą įrašomas periodinis leidiny
Page 246 and 247:
Redakcijos pastabos. Straipsnių re
Page 248 and 249:
242 Editorial Note TILTAI*BRIDGES*B
Page 250 and 251:
244
Page 252:
246
show all

2013,1 (62) - KlaipÄdos universitetas

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

2013,1 (62) - KlaipÄdos universitetas