vol. I pars III

Libri
Priorum.
A pwutcemuenit fieri inabfblutaartc.intelligif
indeille,qui eft p fe,du
Quid Jit propojitio abfoltt-
•verointemgit''cxfermonc Arift.in
que" refblmt'propo p fe, neceflano
I
ta.ijeftde infjje.
file eft fubic£tu,& pdicatu.Hoc aut Nterio huius fermonis eft fcru-
£t,quia id,in qd res refbluitl'p fe,eft tan propone, qua: vocarde in-
illud,qcl pot inueniri fblum per fe, efle,&abfblutac;d fit,& quie fit
aWq-, rein qua refbluitur res p fe,& opinio Arift.& Expofitoru,qui di-
«ftillud,inqcfrcfbluif'.exepli gra- (ceptauerunt circa hoc.Dicim us,q>
tia, quia corpus compofitum refbl- circa id,qd ad nosperuenitdittum
uitur in elementa per fe,cum inue- ab Expofitoribus,proutfcriptu infriatur
fbla fine eo, & reiblui tur in uenimusin lib.Themiftij, & prouc
alias res, q infunt ei per accidens, q narrauu Abunazar, funtdux opi-
Bequeunt efTe ni fi in copofito,pro- niones, quaru vna eft opinio The-
Uteft fbrma,q eft in compofito.C5 miftij,&Eudemi,& altera € opinio.
8 ftitoaut£hoc,pdicatu&fubieclu,
Theophrafti.Opioitaq-,Theophra
qn in ea refbluit propo, in ueniun- fti e",q>,fp6 abfbluta,t.de inee, eft il.
tur p fe abfq-, reliquis fuis partibus, la,Tq deficitmod
ficut copula: fyllabx,& lirera:,prout
cftresartis inuente per fede partibus
oratioiscatcgoricc^qu? potinfelligi
per fe,abfq-,q> fit pars oratio-
»is categories. Ac copula €t fignificat
habitudine pr^dicati & fiibie-
«fti,& eft in propone f m modum co
iundionism proponibus hypothe
ticis^ fm modum componis in re
bus copofitisex rebus, ex quibus co
ponuntur, & ficut compofitil no di
cimus,q? refbluatur in compofitio-
C ne,feddicimus,q? refbluatur in res,
exquibusducomponitur,fitcompofitum,fic
dicimus de prop6ne,q>
non refbluatur in copulam, fed refoluitui
in res, quarum coiuncl:ionem
fignificat copula, nam copula
eft qua?dam coniun^io.Oftenfum
ijtaqueeftdehac definitionetermi
ni,quod fitdefinitioperfec'ta, cui
mhildeficit, vtnonperficiaturnifiexemplo,
proutputauerunt Alc-
X3nder& Abu')azar,&cpadditio
Alexandri addit defectum, na qui
Vltra modu luperaddit, fubtrahit,
9 neceflarij,& mod
9 poi'is,& neuter ipfbru exprimid"?
ea,& ofofm fe e neceflaria,vPpofis.
Propo itaq; deinec fm oplone" ifto
ru e jf po no habes modu,& quafi e
en'ncceflari^ etpofis,ex quo apta
f t,vtciaddat j alter horu duoRinio
doru fm m% exige"tia. H^c itaq; e
opio Peripareticorum deabfbluta.
Alex.-5^0 Scnouisfimi Expofitores
oes,pr^ter rhemiftium,opinanf,q»
propo deineflefitpropo poflibihs
dum eft in aclurhoc eft,du fuu pdicatu
ineft in avtuipfi fubiedto tcpo
repfenti, c^libet.n.iftoru putat circa
hoc, q?ei 9 oplo fueritopio Arift,
Et vtraq;duarufecl:aru argumen*
tatur ex parte rei in fe, & ex verbis
Arift.in fe, &fortioresfuntilloru,
quiaargumentanf fmopinionem
Theophrafti. Rone g.de rei in fee,
quia propo deinee" fm opinionem
Alex. dimcileeft,q>Tueniac J viis, fed
inu-'nifcontingenter & raro,& tali
bu«; piopouibusnon vttrcn: J cap.i.
agricou£,
tanto minus topici, aut demy
ftratiui. Rones veroip(bru ex^bi's