30.01.2013 Views

enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...

enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...

enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when a compound preverb is added, the verb or this preverb is complicated by the<br />

particle and there is gi phonetic sequence; b) when the verb is of the object<br />

structure, it is in the second person and g morpheme is followed by the i<br />

morpheme of the subject or object version; c) the diphthongization is due to the<br />

existence of o phoneme after the preverb e-: e + o > jo, which causes palatal<br />

sequences ejo-, jo-.<br />

3. ê > j or ê > j > 0 is the quality of the substantive determiner, the genitive<br />

morpheme ê moves into j both in compounds and common collocations with<br />

almost no exceptions. The indicated process is characteristic of all Kartvelian<br />

languages. Thus, it represents a common Kartvelian phenomenon. There are some<br />

exceptions: uÄaêi > uÄaj “elder”, þveêi > þvej “old”, oêi > oj “hundred”<br />

(with compound numerals in certain phonetic positions), boêi > boj “boy”<br />

(vocative), aêo / aêi > aj “over here”, in whose structure the iotization of the ê<br />

phoneme is interpreted in a different way (Comp. E. Lomtadze).<br />

On the basis of the published text material and our field trip entries it is established<br />

that iotization is characteristic of the whole Megrelian, but this process is not<br />

uniform according to the dialects, in particular, l > j and ê > j processes, as<br />

well as i > j processes , are confirmed in Senakian-Martvilian. On the other<br />

hand, only the latter is characteristic of Zugdidian-Samurzakanoan.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!