Anthony, B. J., & Graham, F. K. (1983). Evidence for sensory-selective set in young infants.Science, 220, 742-744.Anthony, B. J., & Graham, F. K. (1985). Blink reflex mo<strong>di</strong>fication by selective attention:Evidence for the modulation of “automatic” processing. Biological Psychology, 21, 43-59.Ashare, R. L., Hawk, L. W. & Mazzullo, R. J. (2007). Motivated attention: Incentive effectson attentional mo<strong>di</strong>fication of prepulse inhibition. Psychophysiology, 44, 839–845.Battacchi, M. W. (1988). Trattato enciclope<strong>di</strong>co <strong>di</strong> psicologia dell’età evolutiva, Vol. 1.2.Piccin-Nuova Libraria.Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequentialanalysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Balaban, M. T. (1995). Affective influences on startle in five-month-old infants: Reaction tofacial expression of emotion. Child Development, 66, 28-36.Balaban, M. T. (1996). Probing basic mechanisms of sensory attentional, and emotionaldevelopment: modulation of the infant blink response. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. P.Lipsitt (a cura <strong>di</strong>), Advances in Infancy Research, Vol. 10 (pp. 219-256). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.Bellieni, C. V., Severi, F., Bocchi, C., Caparelli, N., Bagnoli, F., Buonocore, G., et al. (2005).Blink-startle reflex habituation in 30-34-week low-risk fetuses. Journal of PerinatalMe<strong>di</strong>cine, 33, 33-37.Berg, W. K., & Balaban, M. T. (1999). Startle elicitation: stimulus parameters, recor<strong>di</strong>ngtechniques, and quantification. In M. E. Dawson, A. M. Schell, & A. H. Böhmelt (a cura<strong>di</strong>), Startle Mo<strong>di</strong>fication. Implication for Neuroscience, Cognitive Science, and ClinicalScience (pp. 21-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Berridge, K. C. (1999). Pleasure, pain, desire, and dread: Hidden core processes of emotion.In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (a cura <strong>di</strong>), Well-Being: The foundations ofhedonic psychology (pp. 525-557). New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Berridge, K. C. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioural neuroscience. Physiology &Behavior, 81, 179-209.Berridge, K. C., & Winkielman, P. (2003). What is an unconsious emotion? (The case forunconscious “liking”). Cognition and Emotion, 17, 181-211.Blumenthal, T. D., Cuthbert, B. N., Filion, D. L., Hackley, S., Lipp, O. V., & Van Boxtel, A.(2005). Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographicstu<strong>di</strong>es. Psychophysiology, 42, 1–15.100
Blumenthal, T. D., & Goode, C. T. (1991). The startle eyeblink response to low intensityacoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 28, 296–306.Bolzani, L., Messinger, D. S., Yale, M. E., & Don<strong>di</strong>, M. (2002). Smiling in infancy. In M. H.Abel (a cura <strong>di</strong>), An empirical reflection on the smile (pp. 111-135). New York: TheEdwin Mellen Press.Borod, J. C. (1992). Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion: A focus onunilateral brain damage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 339-348.Borod, J. C. (1993). Emotion and the brain-Anatomy and theory: An introduction to thespecial section. Neuropsychology, 7, 427-432.Bradley, M. M., Co<strong>di</strong>spoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion andmotivation I: defensive and appetitive reaction in picture processing. Emotion, 1, 276-298.Bradley, M. M. Co<strong>di</strong>spoti, M., & Lang, P. J. (2006). A multi-process account of startlemodulation during affective perception. Psychophysiology, 43, 486–497.Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1993). Pictures as prepulse: Attention andemotion in startle mo<strong>di</strong>fication. Psychophysiology, 30, 541-545.Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1995). Imagine that! Startle in action andperception. Psychophysiology, 32, Suppl., S21.Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affect and the startle reflex. In M. E.Dawson, A. M. Schell, & A. H. Böhmelt (Eds.), Startle mo<strong>di</strong>fication: Implications forneuroscience, cognitive science, and clinical science (pp. 157-183). New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.Brazelton, T. B. (1973). Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott.Brazelton, T. B. (1984). Neonatal behavioral assessment scale. Second e<strong>di</strong>tion. Philadelphia:JB Lippincott.Brown, J. S., Kalish, H. I., & Farber, I. E. (1951). Con<strong>di</strong>tioned fear as revealed by themagnitude of startle response to an au<strong>di</strong>tory stimulus. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 41, 317-327.Burgdoff, J., & Panksepp, J. (2006). The neurobiology of positive emotions. Neuroscienceand Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 173-1887.Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures:Motivationally Biased Attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28 (3), 221-243.Camras, L. A. (1991). Conceptualizing early infant affect: View II and reply. In K.Strongman (a cura <strong>di</strong>), International Review of <strong>Stu<strong>di</strong></strong>es on Emotion. New York: Wiley.101
- Page 1:
Università degli Studi di FerraraD
- Page 4 and 5:
esibizione. Il secondo studio (N =
- Page 6 and 7:
Key words: startle response, infanc
- Page 9 and 10:
IndiceIntroduzione 1Background teor
- Page 11:
Studio 2. Stati attentivi e stati a
- Page 14 and 15:
Cuthbert, & Lang, 1993; Lang, 1995)
- Page 16 and 17:
(whole body startle): l’Automated
- Page 19 and 20:
Background teoricoCaratteristiche p
- Page 21:
Una prima considerazione derivante
- Page 24 and 25:
(Yeomans et al., 2002). Tale effett
- Page 26 and 27:
Sono stati sviluppati diversi metod
- Page 28 and 29:
Bradley, Berg, Cuthbert, & Lang, 20
- Page 30 and 31:
L’inibizione e il potenziamento d
- Page 32 and 33:
Figura 6 . Rappresentazione del fen
- Page 34 and 35:
nudi, mutilazioni, operazioni chiru
- Page 36 and 37:
ortogonali indipendenti (Heponiemi,
- Page 38 and 39:
processamento di emozioni positive
- Page 40 and 41:
itrova un utilizzo del paradigma de
- Page 42 and 43:
nuovamente esaminati e messi a conf
- Page 44 and 45:
Nello studio del 1998, in particola
- Page 47 and 48:
Capitolo 2Nuove proposte metodologi
- Page 49 and 50:
L’utilizzo di questa piattaforma
- Page 51 and 52:
ilevazione della risposta di startl
- Page 53 and 54:
stimulus. L’intensità della cont
- Page 55 and 56:
considerato un indice patognomico d
- Page 57 and 58:
Tuttavia nessuna ricerca ha più re
- Page 59 and 60:
La prima, evidenziata da Grillon e
- Page 61 and 62: Chen, Bakeman, Norris, & Cain, 2006
- Page 63 and 64: Studio 1Esibizione spontanea di esp
- Page 65 and 66: Grazie all’utilizzo dello startle
- Page 67 and 68: sulla risposta di startle. In parti
- Page 69 and 70: il livello normale di apertura dell
- Page 71 and 72: fatto che, secondo Oster, sul volto
- Page 73 and 74: effettuata con l’EBS Scale, cioè
- Page 75 and 76: Magnitudine (Volt)0,0070,0060,0050,
- Page 77 and 78: DiscussioneScopo del presente esper
- Page 79: espressioni facciali, si può affer
- Page 82 and 83: l’ampiezza diminuiva (inibizione
- Page 84 and 85: Grazie ad un’analisi video dei mo
- Page 86 and 87: MetodoPartecipantiHanno partecipato
- Page 88 and 89: Sulla base della videoregistrazione
- Page 90 and 91: vengono chiusi con forza (azione ch
- Page 92 and 93: Latenza della risposta di startleSo
- Page 94 and 95: all’onset, l’interazione tra l
- Page 96 and 97: modulatori esercitati sulla rispost
- Page 98 and 99: Innanzitutto, sulla base di questi
- Page 100 and 101: ilassamento muscolare) avvenute in
- Page 102 and 103: nell’adulto. La replica di tali r
- Page 104 and 105: sistema attentivo. Sulla base di qu
- Page 106 and 107: imane l’attività dei due sistemi
- Page 108 and 109: all’attivazione dei sistemi neura
- Page 111: Riferimenti bibliograficiAgnoli, S.
- Page 115 and 116: Davis, M. (2006). Neural system inv
- Page 117 and 118: Franchin, L. (2006). A new non-inva
- Page 119 and 120: Hoffman, H. S., Cohen, M. E., & And
- Page 121 and 122: Langsdorf, P., Izard, C., Rayais, M
- Page 123 and 124: Richards, J. E. (1997). Peripheral
- Page 125 and 126: Steiner, J. E., Glaser, D., Hawilo,