Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING THEOLOGY AGAIN AND AGAIN 99Evil can also be expressed as the “mysterium inquitatis”since every human being experiences it and suffers from it in amanner that is completely personal and unique. Also every erais characterized by typologies of experiences of specific evils. Itseems that the recent and contemporary era may have added anew dimension to the horror and depth of evil, a new “nonquality.”In the next section we will explore some of these characteristics.2. The scandal of evil symbolized in the name ofAuschwitzIn the twentieth century evil assumed a new destructivedimension, our understanding of evil took a kind of “qualitativeleap” toward the negative. The situation in the second half ofthe twentieth century has often been described as the “post-Auschwitz” period, so that Auschwitz has become the paradigmfor atrocious evil on a level previously unknown. The name“Auschwitz” becomes the metaphor for what is considered as arupture in the historical development of civilization, as a catastropheof universal proportions. 11In her book Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on theBanality of Evil, Hannah Arendt gave a razor-sharp analysis ofthe evil of Auschwitz. In the “Postscript,” a kind of final evaluationof the book, Arendt characterizes the evil of Auschwitzwith the term “administrative massacre.” 12 For the evil ofAuschwitz was not a question of distinct and limited operations,but rather of a massacre, strategically calculated andplanned, with the complete extermination of the Jewish populationas its purpose. 13 To achieve a project on this scale requiredorganization by an absolutist regime driven to the extreme at11Regina Ammicht-Quinn, Von Lissabon bis Auschwitz (Freiburg-Schweiz: Universitätsverlag, 1992), 195-197.12Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality ofevil (New York: Penguin Books, 1994), 288.13See Irving Greenberg, “Clouds of Smoke, Pillar of Fire: Judaism,Christianity, and Modernity after the Holocaust,” in Eva Fleischner, ed.,Auschwitz: Beginning of a new Era? (New York: Ktav Pub. Co., 1977). Six
100 BRUNO HIDBERthe political, economic and financial levels. In order to function,such organization needed the kind of industry and personnelthat could adapt themselves to what Max Weber called the“criteria of modernity.” 14 That is, Auschwitz and all that itstands for required an anonymous bureaucracy, an efficientspecification of work and a division of labor, and a rigid separationbetween the public and private spheres. Ethical-moral considerations,if they still arose at all, were categorically shutwithin the private sphere. To achieve an “administrative massacre,”morality had to be substituted for by efficiency andfunctionality. “This ‘objective’ attitude – talking about concentrationcamps in terms of ‘economy’ – was typical of the S.S.mentality”. 15 In this way the institutions and organizations ofthe Holocaust took on the character of an all-inclusive industry,connected by thousands of links to industry in general. The“industrial” aspect became quasi-autonomous. Human beingswere massacred and the operative category was no longer thehuman person, but rather the technical functioning of the factoryand of everything it needed for the best possible results. In1943, it was decided that children would no longer be gassedseparately from their parents but burned alive instead, not toadd to the horror or suffering, but simply to increase the numbersliquidated and at the same time to cut costs. Such is theface of administrative massacre: cold, passionless, programmedand organized perfectly as an industrial enterprise. 16What is new in this atrocity and “non-quality” of evil isexpressed in a program of extermination of human beings inwhich the face of the human person is rendered invisible by thelogic and strategy of industrial, financial and bureaucraticfunctionality, carried to a sophisticated extreme. Already heresome of the more negative features of what will later be called“globalization” are emerging. In theological terms, what areemerging are “structures of sin”, which tend to hide andmillion Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust program, correspondingto 30% of the worldwide Jewish population in 1939 and 80% of all rabbisand torah scholars.14Rüdiger Safranski, Das Böse (München: Hanser, 1997), 271-272.15Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem, 69.16R. Ammicht-Quinnn, Von Lissabon bis Auschwitz, 200-202.
- Page 46 and 47: 48 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEthat we cannot
- Page 48 and 49: 50 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEby which he me
- Page 50 and 51: 52 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEgestion that w
- Page 52 and 53: 54 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEare intelligib
- Page 54 and 55: 56 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEdeath, in rela
- Page 56 and 57: 58 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEterms of an ob
- Page 58 and 59: 60 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEacter of the n
- Page 60 and 61: StMor 44 (2006) 63-92GIOVANNI DEL M
- Page 62 and 63: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 64 and 65: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 66 and 67: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 68 and 69: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 70 and 71: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 72 and 73: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 74 and 75: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 76 and 77: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 78 and 79: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 80 and 81: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 82 and 83: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 84 and 85: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 86 and 87: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 88 and 89: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 90 and 91: StMor 44 (2006) 93-120BRUNO HIDBER
- Page 92 and 93: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 94 and 95: Finally even what humanity defines
- Page 98 and 99: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 100 and 101: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 102 and 103: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 104 and 105: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 106 and 107: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 108 and 109: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 110 and 111: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 112 and 113: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 114 and 115: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 116 and 117: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 118 and 119: StMor 44 (2006) 121-139FAUSTINO PAR
- Page 120 and 121: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 122 and 123: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 124 and 125: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 126 and 127: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 128 and 129: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 130 and 131: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 132 and 133: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 134 and 135: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 136 and 137: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 138 and 139: 142 SILVIO BOTEROxión acerca del
- Page 140 and 141: 144 SILVIO BOTEROy teólogos, afirm
- Page 142 and 143: 146 SILVIO BOTEROteológica de los
- Page 144 and 145: 148 SILVIO BOTEROLa crisis de renov
100 BRUNO HIDBERthe political, economic and financial levels. In order to function,such organization needed the kind of industry and personnelthat could adapt themselves to what Max Weber called the“criteria of modernity.” 14 That is, Auschwitz and all that itstands for required an anonymous bureaucracy, an efficientspecification of work and a division of labor, and a rigid separationbetween the public and private spheres. Ethical-moral considerations,if they still arose at all, were categorically shutwithin the private sphere. To achieve an “administrative massacre,”morality had to be substituted for by efficiency andfunctionality. “This ‘objective’ attitude – talking about concentrationcamps in terms of ‘economy’ – was typical of the S.S.mentality”. 15 In this way the institutions and organizations ofthe Holocaust took on the character of an all-inclusive industry,connected by thousands of links to industry in general. The“industrial” aspect became quasi-autonomous. Human beingswere massacred and the operative category was no longer thehuman person, but rather the technical functioning of the factoryand of everything it needed for the best possible results. In1943, it was decided that children would no longer be gassedseparately from their parents but burned alive instead, not toadd to the horror or suffering, but simply to increase the numbersliquidated and at the same time to cut costs. Such is theface of administrative massacre: cold, passionless, programmedand organized perfectly as an industrial enterprise. 16What is new in this atrocity and “non-quality” of evil isexpressed in a program of extermination of human beings inwhich the face of the human person is rendered invisible by thelogic and strategy of industrial, financial and bureaucraticfunctionality, carried to a sophisticated extreme. Already heresome of the more negative features of what will later be called“globalization” are emerging. In theological terms, what areemerging are “structures of sin”, which tend to hide andmillion Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust program, correspondingto 30% of the worldwide Jewish population in 1939 and 80% of all rabbisand torah scholars.14Rüdiger Safranski, Das Böse (München: Hanser, 1997), 271-272.15Hannah Arendt, Eichmann in Jerusalem, 69.16R. Ammicht-Quinnn, Von Lissabon bis Auschwitz, 200-202.