Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
234 MARTIN MCKEEVER(2) a presentation of the salient content of each contribution onthis score and (3) a more personal evaluative reflection on thebroader questions raised by this study.Status quaestionisThe question guiding the reflection of the symposium isindicated in the sub-title of the book: Bernhard Häring’s contributionto the renewal of moral theology. Such a question, assome of the contributors are quick to point out, co-involves ahost of other questions, including the following: What is moraltheology? Are there different kinds of moral theology? Whichkind was prevalent at the time of Häring? Why did it needrenewal? What constitutes renewal in this discipline? Has itbeen successful? According to what criteria? What kind ofmoral theology is now prevalent? Does it need renewal? etc.Some of these questions were already being posed at the timeDGC was published, indeed before it was written. Others haveemerged or are in the process of emerging in the interveningperiod, most of all in the context of the Second Vatican Counciland its reception. This volume, then, may be understood, asexplained in the Preface (8), both as a revisiting of an importanttext and as an exploration of a range of underlying historicaland theological questions, some of which remain open. Thesubject matter is such that it necessarily involves us in a revisionof some of the most important questions faced by moraltheology in the last fifty years and invites us to consider someimportant questions for the years to come.ContentThese different levels of interest find expression in thethemes treated in the contributions, some of which are directlyfocused on DGC, while others focus on related questions of amore general nature. Thus the pieces by Raphael Gallagher andEberhard Schockenhoff consider in detail, though in interestinglydifferent perspectives, the content of the original workand its contribution to the renewal of moral theology, beforeand after Vatican II. The pieces by Bruno Hidber and Josef
THE 50 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LAW OF CHRIST 235Römelt take a broader perspective and consider Häring’s overallcontribution in the ambience of culture and the human sciencesrespectively. The pieces by Klaus Arntz and MarcianoVidal are of a more general nature still, broaching some keyquestions concerning the place of Häring in the history ofmoral theology. An attempt will now be made to sketch theessential content of each piece, trying to discern what it contributesto the question in hand.Raphael GallagherThe structure of Gallagher’s contribution concerning thesignificance of DGC for the renewal of moral theology is somewhatcomplex but the essential elements may be examinedunder the following headings: preliminary considerations concerningthe nature of moral theology, the genre of DGC, itsimmediate historical context, the main lines of the proposedrenewal, three specific central substantive themes and an evaluation.The preliminary considerations offered will be taken upagain in the third part of this piece in that they have an importwell beyond the specific case of DGC. Gallagher warns againstthe, not uncommon, projection of the term ‘moral theology’onto periods of history in which this discipline did not exist.Strictly speaking, ‘moral theology’ is the name of that specializedbranch of theology, as it emerges after the Council of Trent,which has as its specific goal the preparation of future confessorsfor their ministry (11).It is within this historical period that the genre ‘manual’(Handbuch, Lehrbuch) emerges and develops a characteristicmethod and style. Gallagher insists that he understands his taskas the study of DGC as a representative of this genre, withinthis understanding of moral theology. This is a complicatedquestion but it is not the same question as the relationshipbetween DGC and moral reflection within theology before theCouncil of Trent or after Vatican II. This latter question willalso be taken up below.Having surveyed the immediate historical context in whichDSG emerges, Gallagher offers a sketch of the main lines of therenewal it offers, having left open the question as to whether
- Page 178 and 179: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 180 and 181: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 182 and 183: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 184 and 185: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 186 and 187: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 188 and 189: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 190 and 191: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 192 and 193: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 194 and 195: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 196 and 197: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 198 and 199: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 200 and 201: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 202 and 203: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 204 and 205: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 206 and 207: ÉTICA ANALITICA SEGUNDO R. CARNAP
- Page 208 and 209: 214 RÉAL TREMBLAYde choix du patri
- Page 210 and 211: 216 RÉAL TREMBLAYconsentement fili
- Page 212 and 213: 218 RÉAL TREMBLAYmort, acquis des
- Page 214 and 215: 220 RÉAL TREMBLAYperception du mys
- Page 216 and 217: 222 RÉAL TREMBLAYoppositions entre
- Page 218 and 219: 224 RÉAL TREMBLAYà la première s
- Page 220 and 221: 226 RÉAL TREMBLAYcréés. Et tout
- Page 222 and 223: 228 RÉAL TREMBLAYqui l’engendre,
- Page 224 and 225: 230 RÉAL TREMBLAYde Marie de laque
- Page 226 and 227: 232 RÉAL TREMBLAYrentes, par son o
- Page 230 and 231: 236 MARTIN MCKEEVERHäring understo
- Page 232 and 233: 238 MARTIN MCKEEVERsented by Härin
- Page 234 and 235: 240 MARTIN MCKEEVERund das Gute (Th
- Page 236 and 237: 242 MARTIN MCKEEVERparticular conce
- Page 238 and 239: 244 MARTIN MCKEEVERdeveloper of thi
- Page 240 and 241: 246 MARTIN MCKEEVEREvaluative obser
- Page 242 and 243: 248 MARTIN MCKEEVERpose change. (Mo
- Page 244 and 245: 250 MARTIN MCKEEVERproponent of a p
- Page 246 and 247: 252 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 248 and 249: 254 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 250 and 251: 256 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 252 and 253: 258 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 254 and 255: 260 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 256 and 257: 262 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 258 and 259: 264 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 260 and 261: 266 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 262 and 263: 268 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 264 and 265: 270 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 266 and 267: 272 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 268 and 269: 274 BOOK PRESENTATION / PRESENTACIO
- Page 270 and 271: 276 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESmental mor
- Page 272 and 273: 278 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESconsistent
- Page 274 and 275: 280 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESFour, “T
- Page 276 and 277: 282 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESEl autor h
THE 50 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE LAW OF CHRIST 235Römelt take a broader perspective and consider Häring’s overallcontribution in the ambience of culture and the human sciencesrespectively. The pieces by Klaus Arntz and MarcianoVidal are of a more general nature still, broaching some keyquestions concerning the place of Häring in the history ofmoral theology. An attempt will now be made to sketch theessential content of each piece, trying to discern what it contributesto the question in hand.Raphael GallagherThe structure of Gallagher’s contribution concerning thesignificance of DGC for the renewal of moral theology is somewhatcomplex but the essential elements may be examinedunder the following headings: preliminary considerations concerningthe nature of moral theology, the genre of DGC, itsimmediate historical context, the main lines of the proposedrenewal, three specific central substantive themes and an evaluation.The preliminary considerations offered will be taken upagain in the third part of this piece in that they have an importwell beyond the specific case of DGC. Gallagher warns againstthe, not uncommon, projection of the term ‘moral theology’onto periods of history in which this discipline did not exist.Strictly speaking, ‘moral theology’ is the name of that specializedbranch of theology, as it emerges after the Council of Trent,which has as its specific goal the preparation of future confessorsfor their ministry (11).It is within this historical period that the genre ‘manual’(Handbuch, Lehrbuch) emerges and develops a characteristicmethod and style. Gallagher insists that he understands his taskas the study of DGC as a representative of this genre, withinthis understanding of moral theology. This is a complicatedquestion but it is not the same question as the relationshipbetween DGC and moral reflection within theology before theCouncil of Trent or after Vatican II. This latter question willalso be taken up below.Having surveyed the immediate historical context in whichDSG emerges, Gallagher offers a sketch of the main lines of therenewal it offers, having left open the question as to whether