Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING THEOLOGY AGAIN AND AGAIN 113theology to become silent, because it gives witness simply by itsexistence to the fact that this world with its injustice and evilcannot be the ultimate reality. Horckheimer affirms that theologyis the expression of a yearning, of the yearning that theassassin cannot triumph over his innocent victim. 48The problem and the scandal of evil do not cry out against,but rather for the existence of a God. Only an instance beyondevil, greater and more powerful than any of evil’s depths ofatrocity, only an omnipotent and good God can keep alive thehope that the assassin truly will not triumph over the victim,that instead, goodness and justice will triumph over every evil.Thomas Aquinas has pushed the dynamic of this line of thoughtall the way to its logical conclusion by overturning the affirmationthat the existence of evil would be an argument against theexistence of God with the assertion: “quia malum est, deus est”(“because there is evil, there is God”). 49 Such hope becomesconcrete, if God not only exists, but acts in the world and inhuman history.Theology must therefore speak of God precisely in the faceof evil if theology wants to respond to the hope that is offeredto man, according to 1 Pet 3: 15: “In your hearts reverenceChrist as Lord. Always be prepared to make a defense to anyone who calls you to account for the hope that is in you”. Itmust speak of God in the face of evil because of man, becauseof his dignity and because of his destiny. It must speak of Godin the face of evil because of God Himself, because of His holyname and because of His being. For theology to remain silentin the face of this challenge and this scandal would be to betrayits raison d’être.48Max Horckheimer, Die Sehnsucht nach dem ganz Anderen (Hamburg:Furche, 1970), 61-62.The Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski moves in the same direction.He writes: „Dostoyeveski’s famous dictum, ‘If there is no God,everything is permissible,’ is valid not only as a moral rule, but also as anepistemological principle. This means that the legitimate use of the concept‘truth’ or the belief that ‚truth’ may even be justifiably predicated of ourknowledge is possible only on the assumption of an absolute Mind.“Kolakowski, Religion – If there is no God ... On God, the Devil, Sin and otherWorries of the so-called Philosophy of Religion (New York: Oxford, 1982), 82.49St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa contra gentiles, III, 71.
114 BRUNO HIDBERBut theology has to be sensitive to the horrible experiencesand sufferings of evil in the contemporary era and to seekappropriate language both at the level of method and content.It is not helpful to undertake such a discourse with methodologicaland abstract precision alone, for sensitivity to the experience,the questions and the concerns of contemporary humanbeings is also needed. It needs to be emphasized that to posequestions about evil does not necessarily mean a desire to trampleover sensitivity and concrete experience with abstract theories.Here, experience and research do not stand over againsteach other like theory and praxis; rather, they work togetherwith each other. It is actually experience which shows howhuman beings have reflected most profoundly about evil preciselywhen they have also had to experience, in the most profoundway, suffering, loss of meaning, vulnerability and guilt...Job did not start to think about evil and dispute with God whileeverything was going well, but rather when he was stricken byevil on all sides. 50Where man encounters evil, he experiences it as somethingthat contradicts his most intimate aspirations, that enslavesand destroys him. Evil strikes at the core of the person.Therefore, he cannot help but cry out: Why must I suffer? Whyare innocent children tortured? Why does evil erupt in the livesof those who are just toward God and neighbor? Consequently,the believer is always bound to ask himself: How can I abandonmyself unreservedly to God in faith, without doubting Hisgoodness and power in the face of evil?Such questions do not run along the lines of abstract theory;rather, they express a misery experienced personally, a miserywhich yearns to know: How can I overcome evil? Does lifestill have meaning despite all this evil, and can we still believein God in the face of evil’s extraordinary depths? All of these are50Brian V. Johnstone makes this same point: “The immediate confrontationwith pain and affliction stirs protest and provokes questions, but theexperience is, at this point, mute and inarticulate. It needs words if itshuman significance is to be expressed.” Johnstone, “Learning through suffering:the moral meaning of negative experience,” in R. Gallagher and B.McConvery, eds. History and Conscience: Studies in Honor of SeanO’Riordan, C.Ss.R. (Dublin, Ireland: Gill and Macmillan, 1989),146.
- Page 60 and 61: StMor 44 (2006) 63-92GIOVANNI DEL M
- Page 62 and 63: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 64 and 65: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 66 and 67: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 68 and 69: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 70 and 71: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 72 and 73: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 74 and 75: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 76 and 77: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 78 and 79: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 80 and 81: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 82 and 83: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 84 and 85: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 86 and 87: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 88 and 89: IMPLICANZE CANONISTICHE DELL’AIDS
- Page 90 and 91: StMor 44 (2006) 93-120BRUNO HIDBER
- Page 92 and 93: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 94 and 95: Finally even what humanity defines
- Page 96 and 97: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 98 and 99: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 100 and 101: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 102 and 103: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 104 and 105: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 106 and 107: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 108 and 109: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 112 and 113: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 114 and 115: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 116 and 117: EVIL: QUESTIONING AND CHALLENGING T
- Page 118 and 119: StMor 44 (2006) 121-139FAUSTINO PAR
- Page 120 and 121: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 122 and 123: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 124 and 125: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 126 and 127: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 128 and 129: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 130 and 131: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 132 and 133: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 134 and 135: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 136 and 137: OLTRE M. NOVAK PER UNA PRATICA CRIS
- Page 138 and 139: 142 SILVIO BOTEROxión acerca del
- Page 140 and 141: 144 SILVIO BOTEROy teólogos, afirm
- Page 142 and 143: 146 SILVIO BOTEROteológica de los
- Page 144 and 145: 148 SILVIO BOTEROLa crisis de renov
- Page 146 and 147: 150 SILVIO BOTERO2. EL TEÓLOGO MOR
- Page 148 and 149: 152 SILVIO BOTEROAparece también i
- Page 150 and 151: 154 SILVIO BOTEROlas circunstancias
- Page 152 and 153: 156 SILVIO BOTEROmoralista postconc
- Page 154 and 155: 158 SILVIO BOTEROse lanzó al traba
- Page 156 and 157: 160 SILVIO BOTEROdividida entre la
- Page 158 and 159: 162 SILVIO BOTEROles en la iglesia
114 BRUNO HIDBERBut theology has to be sensitive to the horrible experiencesand sufferings of evil in the contemporary era and to seekappropriate language both at the level of method and content.It is not helpful to undertake such a discourse with methodologicaland abstract precision alone, for sensitivity to the experience,the questions and the concerns of contemporary humanbeings is also needed. It needs to be emphasized that to posequestions about evil does not necessarily mean a desire to trampleover sensitivity and concrete experience with abstract theories.Here, experience and research do not stand over againsteach other like theory and praxis; rather, they work togetherwith each other. It is actually experience which shows howhuman beings have reflected most profoundly about evil preciselywhen they have also had to experience, in the most profoundway, suffering, loss of meaning, vulnerability and guilt...Job did not start to think about evil and dispute with God whileeverything was going well, but rather when he was stricken byevil on all sides. 50Where man encounters evil, he experiences it as somethingthat contradicts his most intimate aspirations, that enslavesand destroys him. Evil strikes at the core of the person.Therefore, he cannot help but cry out: Why must I suffer? Whyare innocent children tortured? Why does evil erupt in the livesof those who are just toward God and neighbor? Consequently,the believer is always bound to ask himself: How can I abandonmyself unreservedly to God in faith, without doubting Hisgoodness and power in the face of evil?Such questions do not run along the lines of abstract theory;rather, they express a misery experienced personally, a miserywhich yearns to know: How can I overcome evil? Does lifestill have meaning despite all this evil, and can we still believein God in the face of evil’s extraordinary depths? All of these are50Brian V. Johnstone makes this same point: “The immediate confrontationwith pain and affliction stirs protest and provokes questions, but theexperience is, at this point, mute and inarticulate. It needs words if itshuman significance is to be expressed.” Johnstone, “Learning through suffering:the moral meaning of negative experience,” in R. Gallagher and B.McConvery, eds. History and Conscience: Studies in Honor of SeanO’Riordan, C.Ss.R. (Dublin, Ireland: Gill and Macmillan, 1989),146.