Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
480 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESHans-Joachim Höhn explores further the theme the loss of a unifiedreason, and the emergence of de-centered reason. He raises theinteresting question of how this new form of reason would relate tofaith. Martin Honecker widens the discussion of reason, to includeaffectivity and experience. The second chapter turns to questions ofphilosophy and fundamental theology. Ludger Honnefelder raisesthe old question of whether good means what God wills, in a newform. How should we construe the ethical as such? Is it to be understoodprimarily as a matter of obligation, and should it be widened,as Paul Ricoeur thinks, to include the moment of hope? Jean-ClaudWolf, against the background of contemporary endeavours to establisha purely secular ethic, and the consequent banning of religiousconsiderations from public ethical discussion, considers whetherthere can be an ethic which is developed from Christian sources. Inthe course of his considerations he introduces an informative analysisof theories of punishment and forgiveness. It seems that in therealm of secular ethics, the only role for scriptural texts is purely asliterary allusions; they are no longer given any normative significance.Yet precisely as literary, they may be found to be unavoidablewhen ethical debate goes beyond the superficial and seeks for depth.Hansjürgen Verweyen poses a very precise question: what foundationalfunction can historical revelation have in relation to ethics? Heinvestigates briefly a number of authors who have made a significantcontribution to the question, beginning with Anselm of Canterbury.Thomas Pröpper gives himself what would seem to a difficult task,namely to work from the principle of autonomy to universal solidarity,which he regards as an unavoidable ethical demand in our contemporarysituation.The third chapter is dedicated to the meaning and basis of“autonome Moral” a notion which is very difficulty to translate accuratelyinto English. Hermann Ringeling takes up the issue in the contextof contemporary evangelical ethics. Denis Müller again dealswith evangelical ethics, focusing on its development in debates withmodernity. A Catholic perspective, from outside the German culturalcontext, is presented by Salvatore Privitera This article manifests thewell neigh insuperable difficulties which the “autonomy” questionproduces when it is approached from a cultural and theologicalmilieu different from that in which it emerged. Privitera interpretsthe notion of autonomy in the standard terms of Catholic moral theology,and finds it, in this translation, acceptable but not particular-
REVIEWS / RECENSIONES 481ly helpful. For this reviewer, such a translation fails to grasp theproblem. The issue of autonomy has it roots in the voluntarist tradition,which affected philosophy and theology long before Kant, andwhich was given new life in the Catholic moral tradition by Suarezand those influenced by him, who continued some form of the voluntaristtradition. The residue of this was the notion that moral truthas obligation can be established by an act of the will on the part ofauthority. However, coming also from outside the German intellectualtradition, this reviewer may be likewise mistaken.Other authors continue the discussion. Hans Schelkshorn writeson autonomy and argumentative reason and discourse ethics. KlausDemmer investigates the “proprium” of faith with respect to ethics,where once again the theology of the Cross (without the resurrection)is particularly important. Hans Rotter also analyses the role offaith in ethics. Dietmar Mieth investigates the relationship betweenChristian faith and “world” in the context of Christian ethics. WernerWolbert, deals afresh with some classic questions concerning conscience.A fourth chapter deals with the same fundamental questions,but now in relation to social ethics. Franz Furger offers somevaluable historical and reflective contribution on the moral theologicalcharacter of social ethics. Thomas Hausmanninger takes upagain the problem of the pervasive loss of confidence in the postmodernworld. In this context he proposes that Christianity has aspecific project, which is directed to freedom as emancipation, fundamentallyon a theological level, as freedom from death, and byextension on an ethical level. The fifth chapter is concerned withmethods. Michael Schramm offers valuable insights on the emergenceof Christian social ethics as a discipline distinct from moraltheology in the modern era.. Marianne Heimback Steins writes onthe contribution of women, and feminist theology to a universalethic taking her initial inspiration from Carol Gilligan. In the moraltheology of the past men defined everything that was to be discussed,including women. This essay provides a valuable corrective, from theperspective of the other. The subject must always be seen, not as separate,but as inherently connected to others in society.The concluding chapters treat of significant contemporarymovements that may contribute to Christian ethics. ArnoAnzenbacher writes on the Communitarian thesis; Edmund Arens onDiscourse ethics; Andreas Lob-Hüdepol relates practical self-understandingwith the self-understanding which comes from faith;
- Page 228 and 229: 428 JOSEF SPINDELBÖCKempfangen, al
- Page 230 and 231: 430 JOSEF SPINDELBÖCK6. Ethisch ha
- Page 232 and 233: 432 JOSEF SPINDELBÖCKGrundentschei
- Page 234 and 235: 434 JOSEF SPINDELBÖCKVordergrund s
- Page 236 and 237: 437Chronicle / CrónicaACCADEMIA AL
- Page 238 and 239: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 439nominato pr
- Page 240 and 241: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 441brazione, g
- Page 242 and 243: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 4433. Corpo do
- Page 244 and 245: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 445studente de
- Page 246 and 247: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 447theological
- Page 248 and 249: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 449education e
- Page 250 and 251: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 451ethnic diff
- Page 252 and 253: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 453RAINONE, Gi
- Page 254 and 255: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 455intesa come
- Page 256 and 257: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 457To intend i
- Page 258 and 259: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 459GOMES, Bern
- Page 260 and 261: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 4617.3. Licenz
- Page 262 and 263: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 463DOSSEH, Koc
- Page 264 and 265: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 465MUGO, Peter
- Page 266 and 267: CHRONICLE / CRÓNICA 467WANG, Jian
- Page 268 and 269: 470 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESearly peri
- Page 270 and 271: 472 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESChalmeta,
- Page 272 and 273: 474 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESrali e soc
- Page 274 and 275: 476 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESGraham, Ma
- Page 276 and 277: 478 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESHis evalua
- Page 280 and 281: 482 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESWolfgang G
- Page 282 and 283: 484 REVIEWS / RECENSIONEScreta no s
- Page 284 and 285: 486 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESauthoritat
- Page 286 and 287: 488 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESThe histor
- Page 288 and 289: 490 REVIEWS / RECENSIONES“La Chie
- Page 290 and 291: 492 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESHubo quien
- Page 292 and 293: 494 REVIEWS / RECENSIONEScano por e
- Page 294 and 295: 496 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESPope, Step
- Page 296 and 297: 498 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESbut with m
- Page 298 and 299: 500 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESagostinian
- Page 300 and 301: 502 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESL’opera
- Page 302 and 303: 504 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESlo a fare
- Page 304 and 305: 506 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESSchockenho
- Page 306 and 307: 508 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESnecessary
- Page 308 and 309: 510 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESChapters t
- Page 310 and 311: 513Books Received / Libros recibido
- Page 312 and 313: 515JUSTENHOVEN, HEINZ-GERHARD; SCHU
- Page 314 and 315: 517INDEX OF VOLUME 41 (2003)ÍNDICE
- Page 316: 519PENA GONZÁLEZ, MIGUEL ANXO, Fra
480 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESHans-Joachim Höhn explores further the theme the loss of a unifiedreason, and the emergence of de-centered reason. He raises theinteresting question of how this new form of reason would relate tofaith. Martin Honecker widens the discussion of reason, to includeaffectivity and experience. The second chapter turns to questions ofphilosophy and fundamental theology. Ludger Honnefelder raisesthe old question of whether good means what God wills, in a newform. How should we construe the ethical as such? Is it to be understoodprimarily as a matter of obligation, and should it be widened,as Paul Ricoeur thinks, to include the moment of hope? Jean-ClaudWolf, against the background of contemporary endeavours to establisha purely secular ethic, and the consequent banning of religiousconsiderations from public ethical discussion, considers whetherthere can be an ethic which is developed from Christian sources. Inthe course of his considerations he introduces an informative analysisof theories of punishment and forgiveness. It seems that in therealm of secular ethics, the only role for scriptural texts is purely asliterary allusions; they are no longer given any normative significance.Yet precisely as literary, they may be found to be unavoidablewhen ethical debate goes beyond the superficial and seeks for depth.Hansjürgen Verweyen poses a very precise question: what foundationalfunction can historical revelation have in relation to ethics? Heinvestigates briefly a number of authors who have made a significantcontribution to the question, beginning with Anselm of Canterbury.Thomas Pröpper gives himself what would seem to a difficult task,namely to work from the principle of autonomy to universal solidarity,which he regards as an unavoidable ethical demand in our contemporarysituation.The third chapter is dedicated to the meaning and basis of“autonome Moral” a notion which is very difficulty to translate accuratelyinto English. Hermann Ringeling takes up the issue in the contextof contemporary evangelical ethics. Denis Müller again dealswith evangelical ethics, focusing on its development in debates withmodernity. A Catholic perspective, from outside the German culturalcontext, is presented by Salvatore Privitera This article manifests thewell neigh insuperable difficulties which the “autonomy” questionproduces when it is approached from a cultural and theologicalmilieu different from that in which it emerged. Privitera interpretsthe notion of autonomy in the standard terms of Catholic moral theology,and finds it, in this translation, acceptable but not particular-