Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

studiamoralia.org
from studiamoralia.org More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

480 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESHans-Joachim Höhn explores further the theme the loss of a unifiedreason, and the emergence of de-centered reason. He raises theinteresting question of how this new form of reason would relate tofaith. Martin Honecker widens the discussion of reason, to includeaffectivity and experience. The second chapter turns to questions ofphilosophy and fundamental theology. Ludger Honnefelder raisesthe old question of whether good means what God wills, in a newform. How should we construe the ethical as such? Is it to be understoodprimarily as a matter of obligation, and should it be widened,as Paul Ricoeur thinks, to include the moment of hope? Jean-ClaudWolf, against the background of contemporary endeavours to establisha purely secular ethic, and the consequent banning of religiousconsiderations from public ethical discussion, considers whetherthere can be an ethic which is developed from Christian sources. Inthe course of his considerations he introduces an informative analysisof theories of punishment and forgiveness. It seems that in therealm of secular ethics, the only role for scriptural texts is purely asliterary allusions; they are no longer given any normative significance.Yet precisely as literary, they may be found to be unavoidablewhen ethical debate goes beyond the superficial and seeks for depth.Hansjürgen Verweyen poses a very precise question: what foundationalfunction can historical revelation have in relation to ethics? Heinvestigates briefly a number of authors who have made a significantcontribution to the question, beginning with Anselm of Canterbury.Thomas Pröpper gives himself what would seem to a difficult task,namely to work from the principle of autonomy to universal solidarity,which he regards as an unavoidable ethical demand in our contemporarysituation.The third chapter is dedicated to the meaning and basis of“autonome Moral” a notion which is very difficulty to translate accuratelyinto English. Hermann Ringeling takes up the issue in the contextof contemporary evangelical ethics. Denis Müller again dealswith evangelical ethics, focusing on its development in debates withmodernity. A Catholic perspective, from outside the German culturalcontext, is presented by Salvatore Privitera This article manifests thewell neigh insuperable difficulties which the “autonomy” questionproduces when it is approached from a cultural and theologicalmilieu different from that in which it emerged. Privitera interpretsthe notion of autonomy in the standard terms of Catholic moral theology,and finds it, in this translation, acceptable but not particular-

REVIEWS / RECENSIONES 481ly helpful. For this reviewer, such a translation fails to grasp theproblem. The issue of autonomy has it roots in the voluntarist tradition,which affected philosophy and theology long before Kant, andwhich was given new life in the Catholic moral tradition by Suarezand those influenced by him, who continued some form of the voluntaristtradition. The residue of this was the notion that moral truthas obligation can be established by an act of the will on the part ofauthority. However, coming also from outside the German intellectualtradition, this reviewer may be likewise mistaken.Other authors continue the discussion. Hans Schelkshorn writeson autonomy and argumentative reason and discourse ethics. KlausDemmer investigates the “proprium” of faith with respect to ethics,where once again the theology of the Cross (without the resurrection)is particularly important. Hans Rotter also analyses the role offaith in ethics. Dietmar Mieth investigates the relationship betweenChristian faith and “world” in the context of Christian ethics. WernerWolbert, deals afresh with some classic questions concerning conscience.A fourth chapter deals with the same fundamental questions,but now in relation to social ethics. Franz Furger offers somevaluable historical and reflective contribution on the moral theologicalcharacter of social ethics. Thomas Hausmanninger takes upagain the problem of the pervasive loss of confidence in the postmodernworld. In this context he proposes that Christianity has aspecific project, which is directed to freedom as emancipation, fundamentallyon a theological level, as freedom from death, and byextension on an ethical level. The fifth chapter is concerned withmethods. Michael Schramm offers valuable insights on the emergenceof Christian social ethics as a discipline distinct from moraltheology in the modern era.. Marianne Heimback Steins writes onthe contribution of women, and feminist theology to a universalethic taking her initial inspiration from Carol Gilligan. In the moraltheology of the past men defined everything that was to be discussed,including women. This essay provides a valuable corrective, from theperspective of the other. The subject must always be seen, not as separate,but as inherently connected to others in society.The concluding chapters treat of significant contemporarymovements that may contribute to Christian ethics. ArnoAnzenbacher writes on the Communitarian thesis; Edmund Arens onDiscourse ethics; Andreas Lob-Hüdepol relates practical self-understandingwith the self-understanding which comes from faith;

480 REVIEWS / RECENSIONESHans-Joachim Höhn explores further the theme the loss of a unifiedreason, and the emergence of de-centered reason. He raises theinteresting question of how this new form of reason would relate tofaith. Martin Honecker widens the discussion of reason, to includeaffectivity and experience. The second chapter turns to questions ofphilosophy and fundamental theology. Ludger Honnefelder raisesthe old question of whether good means what God wills, in a newform. How should we construe the ethical as such? Is it to be understoodprimarily as a matter of obligation, and should it be widened,as Paul Ricoeur thinks, to include the moment of hope? Jean-ClaudWolf, against the background of contemporary endeavours to establisha purely secular ethic, and the consequent banning of religiousconsiderations from public ethical discussion, considers whetherthere can be an ethic which is developed from Christian sources. Inthe course of his considerations he introduces an informative analysisof theories of punishment and forgiveness. It seems that in therealm of secular ethics, the only role for scriptural texts is purely asliterary allusions; they are no longer given any normative significance.Yet precisely as literary, they may be found to be unavoidablewhen ethical debate goes beyond the superficial and seeks for depth.Hansjürgen Verweyen poses a very precise question: what foundationalfunction can historical revelation have in relation to ethics? Heinvestigates briefly a number of authors who have made a significantcontribution to the question, beginning with Anselm of Canterbury.Thomas Pröpper gives himself what would seem to a difficult task,namely to work from the principle of autonomy to universal solidarity,which he regards as an unavoidable ethical demand in our contemporarysituation.The third chapter is dedicated to the meaning and basis of“autonome Moral” a notion which is very difficulty to translate accuratelyinto English. Hermann Ringeling takes up the issue in the contextof contemporary evangelical ethics. Denis Müller again dealswith evangelical ethics, focusing on its development in debates withmodernity. A Catholic perspective, from outside the German culturalcontext, is presented by Salvatore Privitera This article manifests thewell neigh insuperable difficulties which the “autonomy” questionproduces when it is approached from a cultural and theologicalmilieu different from that in which it emerged. Privitera interpretsthe notion of autonomy in the standard terms of Catholic moral theology,and finds it, in this translation, acceptable but not particular-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!