Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia
320 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEof earlier Popes and then to that of the present Holy Father. Thisprocedure may make it possible to discern new developments.The first is the test of “realism.” In a sense, this kind of“catholic”, “pastoral” approach aims at results. That is, it isintended to bring about harmony and reconciliation betweennations. A basic objection would be that it has not producedthese results in times of real crisis, and that it is quite unrealisticto assume that it ever could. For example, Benedict XV wasnot able to bring about reconciliation in 1914-1918, nor were theefforts of Pius XII much more successful in the Second WorldWar. A convinced advocate of the necessity of military violencemight, for example, argue that such proposals of harmony andcommunity among nations are pure fancy, and that the only wayto ensure peace is by enforcing it with armies and a balance ofpower.Has Pope John Paul’s policy been more effective than that ofhis predecessors? His opposition to the war in Iraq does notseem to have had a significant effect on the policies of nations,at least in the short term. The invasion went ahead. Pope JohnPaul II has been more forthright in his support for the internationallaw and the United Nations than previous Popes. Perhapsthe strongest and clearest statements emerging from the HolySee, in relation to the war in Iraq, have been in favour of the resolutionof international and other conflicts with the structuresof law. 28 It has been stated forcefully, that it is not acceptable toabandon these mechanisms so as to leave a resolution simply toshear might.How might the Pope’s support for the United Nations andother international institutions be defended against the scepticismmentioned above? Even one who adopted such reservationsabout international institutions would not accept the balanceof armed force as the way to keep peace within his or her28Archbishop TAURAN, called instead for respect for the Charter of theUnited Nations and, in particular, chapter VII which lays down the criteriato be observed in the case of aggression or threats to peace.www.vatican.va/roman_curia/secretariat_state/2003/documents/rc_segst_30524_tauran-gregoriana_it.html.
POPE JOHN PAUL II AND THE WAR IN IRAQ 321own country. 29 All would accept that there has to be some zonewithin which the renunciation of military violence is taken forgranted as a legal and moral requirement. Where this renunciationhas not yet been accepted, we cannot really speak of a“nation.” Why then should it be considered the normal state ofaffairs in the world as a whole, that order must be enforced bythe armies of individual states or coalitions of the same? Why isit inconceivable that the boundaries within which violence isexcluded should not embrace the whole world?In such contingent matters it is hard to assess “success” or“failure.” What we can say, in view of the Pope’s overall visionand moral commitments, is that what he said, had to be said.While speaking out may not have produced immediate success,silence would have been an inexcusable failure.The second test is the theological test. The objection israised that this kind of “pastoral” urging and activity on behalfof peace gives the impression that a kind of peace can beachieved on earth by human effort alone. 30 Further, activity ofthis kind, whether by the Roman Catholic Church or by otherworld groups, has often included diplomatic activity. The HolySee has sought to act as a kind of arbitrator or broker betweenconflicting nations. This is clearly a secular kind of undertakingwhich would be proper for an organization like the U.N.O. Butis it the proper task of the Church? The Catholic Church hasassumed that it is. Indeed, under Pope John Paul II, the Holy Seehas become even more involved in diplomacy than heretofore.This commitment is grounded in the Pope’s concern for theprotection and fostering of human life, for the dignity of the personand human rights. 31 However, I suggest that the Pope’s par-29YODER, Nevertheless, 18.30Cf. YODER, Nevertheless,17.31Archbishop Martino’s address, Il Papa e La Pace, (#6). “Anzitutto, lacentralità della persona umana e, di conseguenza, dei suoi diritti. La SantaSede s’impegna a ricordare e – se necessario – a difendere, il primo dei dirittiumani: quello alla vita, in tutte le fasi dello sviluppo biologico della persona,fino alla sua morte naturale”. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/re_pc_justpeace_doc_2003010_popepeace_it.html.
- Page 71 and 72: 268 MAURIZIO FAGGIONIchiari e prest
- Page 73 and 74: 270 MAURIZIO FAGGIONIvorrà un migl
- Page 75 and 76: 272 MAURIZIO FAGGIONIxenotrapianti,
- Page 77 and 78: 274 MAURIZIO FAGGIONImerciale di ri
- Page 79 and 80: 277StMor 41 (2003) 277-308NICANOR A
- Page 81 and 82: IS THE BRAIN-DEAD PATIENT REALLY DE
- Page 83 and 84: IS THE BRAIN-DEAD PATIENT REALLY DE
- Page 85 and 86: IS THE BRAIN-DEAD PATIENT REALLY DE
- Page 87 and 88: IS THE BRAIN-DEAD PATIENT REALLY DE
- Page 89 and 90: IS THE BRAIN-DEAD PATIENT REALLY DE
- Page 91 and 92: IS THE BRAIN-DEAD PATIENT REALLY DE
- Page 94 and 95: 292 NICANOR AUSTRIACOmeningitis at
- Page 96 and 97: 294 NICANOR AUSTRIACOphysicians, St
- Page 98 and 99: 296 NICANOR AUSTRIACOthat TBD leads
- Page 100 and 101: 298 NICANOR AUSTRIACOus that the br
- Page 102 and 103: 300 NICANOR AUSTRIACOFor those who
- Page 104 and 105: 302 NICANOR AUSTRIACOorgan. Instead
- Page 106 and 107: 304 NICANOR AUSTRIACODeath from the
- Page 108 and 109: 306 NICANOR AUSTRIACOcompatible wit
- Page 110 and 111: 308 NICANOR AUSTRIACOhuman being, a
- Page 112 and 113: 310 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEIn his messag
- Page 114 and 115: 312 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEport the Pope
- Page 116 and 117: 314 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEdevelopment o
- Page 118 and 119: 316 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEToday the uni
- Page 120 and 121: 318 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONELondon (1915)
- Page 124 and 125: 322 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEticular way o
- Page 126 and 127: 324 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEpositive mean
- Page 128 and 129: 326 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEmally approve
- Page 130 and 131: 328 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEcommon good.
- Page 132 and 133: 330 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEtunately long
- Page 134 and 135: 332 RÉAL TREMBLAYnant les textes e
- Page 136 and 137: 334 RÉAL TREMBLAYquintessence des
- Page 138 and 139: 336 RÉAL TREMBLAYaccomplit en effe
- Page 140 and 141: 338 RÉAL TREMBLAYrestre et judicia
- Page 142 and 143: 340 RÉAL TREMBLAY3. Le martyre chr
- Page 144 and 145: 342 RÉAL TREMBLAYtous les commenta
- Page 146 and 147: 344 RÉAL TREMBLAYlivrent aux même
- Page 148 and 149: 346 RÉAL TREMBLAYfours crématoire
- Page 150 and 151: 348 RÉAL TREMBLAY“Un prêtre se
- Page 152 and 153: 351StMor 41 (2003) 351-399SABINO PA
- Page 154 and 155: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 156 and 157: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 158 and 159: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 160 and 161: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 162 and 163: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 164 and 165: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 166 and 167: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 168 and 169: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
- Page 170 and 171: PLURALISMO ANTROPOLOGICO E APPROCCI
POPE JOHN PAUL II AND THE WAR IN IRAQ 321own country. 29 All would accept that there has to be some zonewithin which the renunciation of military violence is taken forgranted as a legal and moral requirement. Where this renunciationhas not yet been accepted, we cannot really speak of a“nation.” Why then should it be considered the normal state ofaffairs in the world as a whole, that order must be enforced bythe armies of individual states or coalitions of the same? Why isit inconceivable that the boundaries within which violence isexcluded should not embrace the whole world?In such contingent matters it is hard to assess “success” or“failure.” What we can say, in view of the Pope’s overall visionand moral commitments, is that what he said, had to be said.While speaking out may not have produced immediate success,silence would have been an inexcusable failure.The second test is the theological test. The objection israised that this kind of “pastoral” urging and activity on behalfof peace gives the impression that a kind of peace can beachieved on earth by human effort alone. 30 Further, activity ofthis kind, whether by the Roman Catholic Church or by otherworld groups, has often included diplomatic activity. The HolySee has sought to act as a kind of arbitrator or broker betweenconflicting nations. This is clearly a secular kind of undertakingwhich would be proper for an organization like the U.N.O. Butis it the proper task of the Church? The Catholic Church hasassumed that it is. Indeed, under Pope John Paul II, the Holy Seehas become even more involved in diplomacy than heretofore.This commitment is grounded in the Pope’s concern for theprotection and fostering of human life, for the dignity of the personand human rights. 31 However, I suggest that the Pope’s par-29YODER, Nevertheless, 18.30Cf. YODER, Nevertheless,17.31Archbishop Martino’s address, Il Papa e La Pace, (#6). “Anzitutto, lacentralità della persona umana e, di conseguenza, dei suoi diritti. La SantaSede s’impegna a ricordare e – se necessario – a difendere, il primo dei dirittiumani: quello alla vita, in tutte le fasi dello sviluppo biologico della persona,fino alla sua morte naturale”. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/re_pc_justpeace_doc_2003010_popepeace_it.html.