Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia Summaries / Resúmenes - Studia Moralia

studiamoralia.org
from studiamoralia.org More from this publisher
10.07.2015 Views

320 BRIAN V. JOHNSTONEof earlier Popes and then to that of the present Holy Father. Thisprocedure may make it possible to discern new developments.The first is the test of “realism.” In a sense, this kind of“catholic”, “pastoral” approach aims at results. That is, it isintended to bring about harmony and reconciliation betweennations. A basic objection would be that it has not producedthese results in times of real crisis, and that it is quite unrealisticto assume that it ever could. For example, Benedict XV wasnot able to bring about reconciliation in 1914-1918, nor were theefforts of Pius XII much more successful in the Second WorldWar. A convinced advocate of the necessity of military violencemight, for example, argue that such proposals of harmony andcommunity among nations are pure fancy, and that the only wayto ensure peace is by enforcing it with armies and a balance ofpower.Has Pope John Paul’s policy been more effective than that ofhis predecessors? His opposition to the war in Iraq does notseem to have had a significant effect on the policies of nations,at least in the short term. The invasion went ahead. Pope JohnPaul II has been more forthright in his support for the internationallaw and the United Nations than previous Popes. Perhapsthe strongest and clearest statements emerging from the HolySee, in relation to the war in Iraq, have been in favour of the resolutionof international and other conflicts with the structuresof law. 28 It has been stated forcefully, that it is not acceptable toabandon these mechanisms so as to leave a resolution simply toshear might.How might the Pope’s support for the United Nations andother international institutions be defended against the scepticismmentioned above? Even one who adopted such reservationsabout international institutions would not accept the balanceof armed force as the way to keep peace within his or her28Archbishop TAURAN, called instead for respect for the Charter of theUnited Nations and, in particular, chapter VII which lays down the criteriato be observed in the case of aggression or threats to peace.www.vatican.va/roman_curia/secretariat_state/2003/documents/rc_segst_30524_tauran-gregoriana_it.html.

POPE JOHN PAUL II AND THE WAR IN IRAQ 321own country. 29 All would accept that there has to be some zonewithin which the renunciation of military violence is taken forgranted as a legal and moral requirement. Where this renunciationhas not yet been accepted, we cannot really speak of a“nation.” Why then should it be considered the normal state ofaffairs in the world as a whole, that order must be enforced bythe armies of individual states or coalitions of the same? Why isit inconceivable that the boundaries within which violence isexcluded should not embrace the whole world?In such contingent matters it is hard to assess “success” or“failure.” What we can say, in view of the Pope’s overall visionand moral commitments, is that what he said, had to be said.While speaking out may not have produced immediate success,silence would have been an inexcusable failure.The second test is the theological test. The objection israised that this kind of “pastoral” urging and activity on behalfof peace gives the impression that a kind of peace can beachieved on earth by human effort alone. 30 Further, activity ofthis kind, whether by the Roman Catholic Church or by otherworld groups, has often included diplomatic activity. The HolySee has sought to act as a kind of arbitrator or broker betweenconflicting nations. This is clearly a secular kind of undertakingwhich would be proper for an organization like the U.N.O. Butis it the proper task of the Church? The Catholic Church hasassumed that it is. Indeed, under Pope John Paul II, the Holy Seehas become even more involved in diplomacy than heretofore.This commitment is grounded in the Pope’s concern for theprotection and fostering of human life, for the dignity of the personand human rights. 31 However, I suggest that the Pope’s par-29YODER, Nevertheless, 18.30Cf. YODER, Nevertheless,17.31Archbishop Martino’s address, Il Papa e La Pace, (#6). “Anzitutto, lacentralità della persona umana e, di conseguenza, dei suoi diritti. La SantaSede s’impegna a ricordare e – se necessario – a difendere, il primo dei dirittiumani: quello alla vita, in tutte le fasi dello sviluppo biologico della persona,fino alla sua morte naturale”. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/re_pc_justpeace_doc_2003010_popepeace_it.html.

POPE JOHN PAUL II AND THE WAR IN IRAQ 321own country. 29 All would accept that there has to be some zonewithin which the renunciation of military violence is taken forgranted as a legal and moral requirement. Where this renunciationhas not yet been accepted, we cannot really speak of a“nation.” Why then should it be considered the normal state ofaffairs in the world as a whole, that order must be enforced bythe armies of individual states or coalitions of the same? Why isit inconceivable that the boundaries within which violence isexcluded should not embrace the whole world?In such contingent matters it is hard to assess “success” or“failure.” What we can say, in view of the Pope’s overall visionand moral commitments, is that what he said, had to be said.While speaking out may not have produced immediate success,silence would have been an inexcusable failure.The second test is the theological test. The objection israised that this kind of “pastoral” urging and activity on behalfof peace gives the impression that a kind of peace can beachieved on earth by human effort alone. 30 Further, activity ofthis kind, whether by the Roman Catholic Church or by otherworld groups, has often included diplomatic activity. The HolySee has sought to act as a kind of arbitrator or broker betweenconflicting nations. This is clearly a secular kind of undertakingwhich would be proper for an organization like the U.N.O. Butis it the proper task of the Church? The Catholic Church hasassumed that it is. Indeed, under Pope John Paul II, the Holy Seehas become even more involved in diplomacy than heretofore.This commitment is grounded in the Pope’s concern for theprotection and fostering of human life, for the dignity of the personand human rights. 31 However, I suggest that the Pope’s par-29YODER, Nevertheless, 18.30Cf. YODER, Nevertheless,17.31Archbishop Martino’s address, Il Papa e La Pace, (#6). “Anzitutto, lacentralità della persona umana e, di conseguenza, dei suoi diritti. La SantaSede s’impegna a ricordare e – se necessario – a difendere, il primo dei dirittiumani: quello alla vita, in tutte le fasi dello sviluppo biologico della persona,fino alla sua morte naturale”. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/re_pc_justpeace_doc_2003010_popepeace_it.html.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!