Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

ZPE-Resonance Impact 27: Still Taboo: Ultra Fast Spin & Counter Rotating Gyroscope, Water, Mercury, Pulse etc • -->>cont: 8-Gravity field tech/Gravity control: Also majority of prior claims can be explained/achieved by somehow rearranging atomic spin-spin alignment/interaction(torsion field)(p193-208, 218-241) or its EM field effect(repulsion-attraction) of any matter, including surrounding air molecules. But if matter becomes "massless state" with gravity tech, then can it also move to anywhere/dimension/time like consciousness with the same mechanics? • All censored & became pseudoscience by 1959(Uhouse, R Dean, TT Brown, Alek, La Violette[B2: Northrop], N Cook, Roschin, Goodall, CB Jones+), this accompanied even backtracking already established Inertia drive to be invalidated(Ro Cook, BR Thornson+), and main media, NGOs, top academics all dutifully obliged without questions just like modern days, but many strong theoretical or experimental gravity field generation claims obviously exist(Cha Carew, De Aquino, L Bell, Tajmar & de Matos, Cox, Ro Cook, Moore, Dimitriou, Anastasozki, B Sorensen +), • Even Gyroscope has very clear repeatable effects(San Kidd, E Laithwaite+), also anyone can repeatedly test two gyroscope with same spin produces twice angular momentum(AM) & precession, while opposite spin has zero AM and zero precession, Some mainstream western scientists actively involved in on-going classified projects?(Dou Torr, Jos Vargas, Ming Yin, Tim Datta+), some, after daring high profile official remarks on significant weight lifting success , completely disappeared from public(Ning Li+). -->>cont: 377 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Resonance Impact 28: GravityTech = Open Electricity • -->>cont: 8-Gravity field tech: Countless pilot/military "flying saucer or orb" witness was ridiculed, or ignored 9ll quite recently, or categorized as "mysterious extraterrestrial cra=", and it rarely goes further than that in mechanics inves9ga9on at mainstream. • One important dis9nc9on can be made for gravity tech by power magnitude difference: While they are all "anomalous" or extreme claims from mainstream perspec9ve, Most claims are barely li/ing or lighten weight of just dozen gramskg range(P Murad, N Rognerud, Ron Kita, Eug Podkletnov+), while a few are claiming ton level of weight with seemingly similar original/star=ng power use(Searl, Hollingshead+) • Same magnitude gap is found in "free energy tech" claims: Some are barely making small "overunity" electricity or heat, while others are claimed to be genera9ng large KW of electricity from "nothing". Is this difference due to in rela9on to "space-9me tear" effect? Also electromagne9c gravity tech research failed but accompanied weather anomaly on consistent basis to commercialize weather tech on private basis(Алексей Филиппович Смирнов «Урания»+) • At least some of an9gravity cra=s witnessed worldwide are likely manmade(human made) with part-9me such capacity: might be amongst known or thought to exist cra=s: -->>cont: 378 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Resonance Impact 28: GravityTech = Open Electricity<br />

• -->>cont: 8-Gravity field tech:<br />

Countless pilot/military "flying saucer or orb" witness was ri<strong>di</strong>culed, or ignored 9ll<br />

quite recently, or categorized as "mysterious extraterrestrial cra=", and it rarely<br />

goes further than that in mechanics inves9ga9on at mainstream.<br />

• One important <strong>di</strong>s9nc9on can be made for gravity tech by power magnitude<br />

<strong>di</strong>fference: While they are all "anomalous" or extreme claims from mainstream<br />

perspec9ve, Most claims are barely li/ing or lighten weight of just dozen gramskg<br />

range(P Murad, N Rognerud, Ron Kita, Eug Podkletnov+), while a few are<br />

claiming ton level of weight with seemingly similar original/star=ng power<br />

use(Searl, Hollingshead+)<br />

• Same magnitude gap is found in "free energy tech" claims: Some are barely making<br />

small "overunity" electricity or heat, while others are claimed to be genera9ng<br />

large KW of electricity from "nothing". Is this <strong>di</strong>fference due to in rela9on to<br />

"space-9me tear" effect? Also electromagne9c gravity tech research failed but<br />

accompanied weather anomaly on consistent basis to commercialize weather tech<br />

on private basis(Алексей Филиппович Смирнов «Урания»+)<br />

• At least some of an9gravity cra=s witnessed worldwide are likely manmade(human<br />

made) with part-9me such capacity: might be amongst known or thought to exist<br />

cra=s: -->>cont:<br />

378<br />

linke<strong>di</strong>n.com/in/newnaturepara<strong>di</strong>gm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

logo

Prodotti

Risorse

Aziende

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!