Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

If LENR is Accepted First -1 Inventor Tech Status • Very small # but steadily growing users of inventor tech (p148-182), esp. for “part free energy” on-board HHO, emulsified water, FIR/Magnet fuel treating devices(Far exceed 0.01% market share in some nations eg China, Bulgaria+), Ion & Cavitation heater, yet other “full free energy” techs are mostly in low practicality as raw tech phase prototype: • ◙ No standardized review, No tech association, No full Western mainstream endorsed open commercialization, inventors isolated, they tend to believe to be “first” in world when numerous similar claims exist in past, mostly small power < 30KWh: Foster ground for deception, ◙ Often Sole inventor is a sales rep & tech server, might have “out of box” communication manner, business style, beliefs(S Allan) ◙ No local support due to non-“public consumer physics” nature ◙ Some of confirmed working techs are still not replicatable by 3rd party ◙ Cases of stock traded co/public institution prosecuted by use of “pseudo science” • ■ But experienced buyer concern of “science contested energy” is now similar to already commercialized “free energy techs”(p148-182), indicated in Baldface Dark Blue), • ➢Previous focus was to differentiate 1-Fraud, 2-Works occasionally, vs 3-Works Normally. ➢Current focus: to tell gap in Performance, Price & Reliability between inventions: i.e. heat & vibration durability, reliable service, operation instruction & warranty works, ➢Companies conduct low-cost unofficial pilot projects on $ back guarantee basis 343

If LENR is Accepted First -2, Inventor Tech Open Source • Would it lead to inventor tech academic review?: Inventors had long been isolated & self taught in development, but are finally starting to turn to information exchange, open sourcing, mechanics disclosure & tips • 1-Ambient power inducer(eg: Kapanadze, Lindemann, Aaron Murakami +) 2-Magnetic motor back EMF(Keppe, Hamel, Ainslie, Bedini, Stovbunenko+ 3-Rapid HHO-Brown-H2 gas production(H-Cat, GEET, Ară Gabriel-Neculai+) 4-LENR(RWGresearch+), 5-Hydrodynamic Cavitation(PP Fominskiy+), 6-Pyramid(Trawoeger+) ■ Web(free-energy-info, Rexresearch, Panacea-Bocaf, Peswiki, Energetic Forum, American AntiGravity+) ■ LENR cold fusion related updates(lenr-coldfusion, cold fusion times +) ■ Often fragmented, unprofessional looking/style presentations • Some inventor tech seems to be backed by mid-sized corporate/3rd world gov’t, installed at pilot projects, military tests+;(e.g. Hidro?, Rosch+) LENR acceptance can cause it to surface as official production of multiple “free energy” mechanics & it can suddenly become “norm”? • Mainstream tech: Cavitation progress(Nanospire +)& LENR link, ICFusion experimental success 2013(more energy produced than consumed to initiate), new low cost Magnetized Target Fusion(also option for anomalous rotating plasma effect generation). Taleyarkan's top mainstream academia suppressed, or likely national security type classified(Ros Tessien: Impulse Device+) acoustic fusion is quietly carried on by other mainstream groups(Wyl Dunbar: AFTEC+) 344

If LENR is Accepted First -1 Inventor Tech Status<br />

• Very small # but stea<strong>di</strong>ly growing users of inventor tech (p148-182), esp. for “part free<br />

energy” on-board HHO, emulsified water, FIR/Magnet fuel treating devices(Far<br />

exceed 0.01% market share in some nations eg China, Bulgaria+), Ion & Cavitation<br />

heater, yet other “full free energy” techs are mostly in low practicality as raw tech<br />

phase prototype:<br />

• ◙ No standar<strong>di</strong>zed review, No tech association, No full Western mainstream<br />

endorsed open commercialization, inventors isolated, they tend to believe to be<br />

“first” in world when numerous similar claims exist in past, mostly small power <<br />

30KWh: Foster ground for deception, ◙ Often Sole inventor is a sales rep & tech<br />

server, might have “out of box” communication manner, business style, beliefs(S<br />

<strong>All</strong>an) ◙ No local support due to non-“public consumer physics” nature ◙ Some of<br />

confirmed working techs are still not replicatable by 3rd party ◙ Cases of stock traded<br />

co/public institution prosecuted by use of “pseudo science”<br />

• ■ But experienced buyer concern of “science contested energy” is now similar to<br />

already commercialized “free energy techs”(p148-182), in<strong>di</strong>cated in Baldface Dark<br />

Blue),<br />

• ➢Previous focus was to <strong>di</strong>fferentiate 1-Fraud, 2-Works occasionally, vs 3-Works<br />

Normally. ➢Current focus: to tell gap in Performance, Price & Reliability between<br />

inventions: i.e. heat & vibration durability, reliable service, operation instruction &<br />

warranty works, ➢Companies conduct low-cost unofficial pilot projects on $ back<br />

guarantee basis 343

logo

Prodotti

Risorse

Aziende

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!