Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?
Share Embed Flag
Download ePaper

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios? 4 • —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like... • E-Public convinced by absurd failure test since real mechanics is unknown to them: i-Test it for unintended purpose(simulated e.g.: tow car by mopet), ii-Misconfigure device(eg drive 100km/h at reversed gear, use diesel instead of gas, plug air intake), iii-Repeat the process till it doesn’t work, only then publicize failed result, iv-If fraudulent test details are found out, “scientist” says “Results would be the same with requested set up anyway, it’s scientifically proven so”, Make this type of old info available on mainstream group documents for many yrs without any updating. • F- Regulators, “Consumer Group”, “Independent” Advertising Watch, BBB receives “LENR complaint”, & science panel hearing concludes false advertisement /fabrication, New law mandates LENR machine to label “No scientific base that this works”. This & below might happen when actual open commercialization starts. • G- When LENR is confirmed effective, use of last attempt "wild card" of mainstream favorite health hazard fear: have top medical doctors vouch for exaggerated "deadly radiation" effect in order to legislate official ban except specially authorized/licensed large power company: ie power price stays the same for consumers at least in West • H- Those insist on LENR validity at mainstream media stage is called “unqualified as scientist” or “insane” & expelled from group/job in ways colleagues notice why I - Private forums split opinions with science types vocally denying effectiveness/validity. 339 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

What Are Harmonious Free Energy Intro Scenarios? 5 • —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like... J- When finally several mainstream institutions start accepting tech validity, others in mainstream would use another favorite: it is a tech with “controversial claims”, and widely labeled such(as adjective) by main media/NGO/gov't, K- End result: majority stays with conventional energy for extra 10+yrs, Large corporate would install LENR but not involving executives officially, instead floor level people(or make it completely unofficial: employee non disclosure agreement or even "national security" label might kick in). L- Then gradually shift western social engineering mode from model β to α: i.e. transition to co-thriving mode. • But this model might fail; Europe might rebels(eg AIIB+), Russia/China/BRICS might have different preference on "reality projection"(BRICS Bank, GMO ban, UGRG, Space+), There are too many official mainstream scientist witnesses. Also Energy, unlike medical tech, is too instantly obvious not to notice effects etc. • 5- Free energy use at remote mines/marine/military/space(e.g. Boeing: Mike Gamble), 6-Media should endorse 3-15% power save on Car/Residential Power Factor Correction for Active Power(MP-R fuel, Kvar.com, EnergyMizer Residential +)(: actual decreased use of electricity, not just Reactive power saving only by decreased supply side waste electricity with conventional PFC device), also water emulsion/HHO additive use at gov't grant level, 7-Sell disruptive proprietary tech as “slightly efficient”(Bloom, Enstroj, Keppe+), 8-Commercialize mainstream accepted 24hr Solar Infrared Harvesting. If too disruptive, allow only residential use but permit unlimited net metering(power trade-in for future use). 340

What Are Harmonious <strong>Free</strong> Energy Intro Scenarios? 4<br />

• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be like...<br />

• E-Public convinced by absurd failure test since real mechanics is unknown to them:<br />

i-Test it for unintended purpose(simulated e.g.: tow car by mopet), ii-Misconfigure<br />

device(eg drive 100km/h at reversed gear, use <strong>di</strong>esel instead of gas, plug air intake),<br />

iii-Repeat the process till it doesn’t work, only then publicize failed result,<br />

iv-If fraudulent test details are found out, “scientist” says “Results would be the same<br />

with requested set up anyway, it’s scientifically proven so”, Make this type of old info<br />

available on mainstream group documents for many yrs without any updating.<br />

• F- Regulators, “Consumer Group”, “Independent” Advertising Watch, BBB receives<br />

“LENR complaint”, & science panel hearing concludes false advertisement<br />

/fabrication, New law mandates LENR machine to label “No scientific base that this<br />

works”. This & below might happen when actual open commercialization starts.<br />

• G- When LENR is confirmed effective, use of last attempt "wild card" of mainstream<br />

favorite health hazard fear: have top me<strong>di</strong>cal doctors vouch for exaggerated "deadly<br />

ra<strong>di</strong>ation" effect in order to legislate official ban except specially authorized/licensed<br />

large power company: ie power price stays the same for consumers at least in West<br />

• H- Those insist on LENR vali<strong>di</strong>ty at mainstream me<strong>di</strong>a stage is called “unqualified as<br />

scientist” or “insane” & expelled from group/job in ways colleagues notice why<br />

I - Private forums split opinions with science types vocally denying<br />

effectiveness/vali<strong>di</strong>ty.<br />

339<br />

linke<strong>di</strong>n.com/in/newnaturepara<strong>di</strong>gm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

logo

Prodotti

Risorse

Aziende

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!