24.11.2014 Views

Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

What Are Harmonious <strong>Free</strong> Energy Intro Scenarios? 3<br />

• —>cont 4-If tech coexistence model β is used for LENR, it would be...<br />

B- Mainstream me<strong>di</strong>a(often PR firm used) news documentary pattern<br />

i- Positively bring sensational news for first "free energy" on first 1/4,<br />

ii- Bring mostly debunking “testimony from experts with evidence”,<br />

iii-Highlight rather rare shady claim cases as if that is typical case of the tech,<br />

iv-Conclude it is fraud, yet they are still allowed to practice criminal activities, &<br />

appeal to mass this needs to be prosecuted. OR mainstream documentary to hold back<br />

from reporting new info: no debuking, just keeping away focus from people.<br />

• C- MainstreamBlog/Me<strong>di</strong>a/Celebrity/Utility/NGO/TED/Wikipe<strong>di</strong>a /Reader’s<br />

Digest/Forum/Gov’t quote mostly failure results & declare: “◙Warning: LENR fraud,<br />

◙There's no valid science base, ◙ Pathological science, ◙ If it really worked, it’s already<br />

been used”. OR they would pretend debunking consensus info in the past as current<br />

truth, and won't allow update as long as possible, due to <strong>di</strong>fficulty in debunking.<br />

• D- Internet: old info packed “<strong>Cold</strong> <strong>Fusion</strong> junk science” web sites to show up on search<br />

engine. Or western me<strong>di</strong>cal industry’s std practice suppression on manufactures is<br />

still remotely possible when official commercialization starts from other than Ecat:<br />

• They are banned from quoting scientific validation/testimonials or from other web<br />

sites, or even simply to state the device purpose as energy production, or in extreme<br />

case open source web is prohibited(J Holman & P Dorneanu+), & purchased device<br />

confiscated for “own safety”. Operations don't comply would be legally raided & shut<br />

down. As a result makers offer as unclear purpose of “Research only intended device”.<br />

Another possible simulation is example of Military Dowsing device(p255). >>cont: 338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!