Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?

Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact

NewNatureParadigm
from NewNatureParadigm More from this publisher
24.11.2014 Views

Bio 28: BioEnergetic Field Medical Status • βvi- Long distance non-local, or local(face to face) non contact Healing(Often Dual Capable): including some contact and own body movement. Progressive western mainstream organizations that accept Qigong/Psychic healing effect as marginal usually ignore or fully debunk possibility of being main drive for cure of serious diseases(eg Charlie Goldsmith "partial psychic healing disclosure" case) with reasons of lacking western std protocol data, and practically treat it as taboo subject(also note Qigong therapy has self-implement types vs third party psychic healing types). As of 2017, significant %(50%+ range) of western patients use various types of non mainstream medical including non contact healing as a supplemental minor means(even this is media under-reported), but very small % takes it seriously as, or small % of non mainstream medical practitioners consider or are allowed to offer as main driver of medical cure in west. • Above progressive mainstream groups often appear to be functioning as if some kind of secondary stop-gap measure or "controlled opposition" of mainstream medical in west(similar to "most disruptive tech debunking" specialist within "free energy" research community) & also effectively preventing nonlocal healing's social acceptance into conventional medical monopolized profitable disease healing effect: • Yet there are controlled protocol researches showing strong results(compared to conventional medical, but usually not as direct control sample comparison) of specific high performer(not blanket therapist average performance) in "fringe" peer reviewed journals or non western publications(see 2 pages later). -->>cont: 269 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Bio 29: Measuring BioEnergetic Field Effect • ->>cont: BioEnergetic field: ■β: Field affecting: vi-Non contact Healing: • Because of alleged significant performance gap by practitioner(this factor is conveniently ignored by mainstream & sometimes used to debunk entire healers claims), large control sample research of high performer for serious chronic disease is very difficult with current funding/profit structure(some exception in China), while mainstream will call such test "Immoral"(they declare nonlocality cannot have any physical effect etc), & can easily obfuscate experiments by pressuring to set conditions that are design to have weaker effect(speculating from other medical tampering & numerous consistent examples of disruptive energy tech experiment tampering by mainstream or its supporting & parasitic groups). • This issue can be equated to exaggerated example of marathon running in which not all runners(e.g. equating as healer) necessarily runs marathon under 2h20mins (e.g. equivalent of meaning as strong healing effect), and some run at 3hrs(eg barely marginal effect), and large majority runs marathon at 3.5hrs and more (eg zero effect or worse). So if randomly select 10 marathon runners(eg healers) to test "in order to get fair controlled results" as average, there might be no effect at all, or one or two strong effect would become "statistical error" - hence still no effect at all. Furthermore, gathering of high performance healers itself would become "selective data" and becomes void as qualified research by "trusted scientific protocol". -->>cont: 270 linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Bio<br />

29: Measuring BioEnergetic Field Effect<br />

• ->>cont: BioEnergetic field: ■β: Field affecting: vi-Non contact Healing:<br />

• Because of alleged significant performance gap by practitioner(this factor is<br />

conveniently ignored by mainstream & sometimes used to debunk entire healers<br />

claims), large control sample research of high performer for serious chronic<br />

<strong>di</strong>sease is very <strong>di</strong>fficult with current fun<strong>di</strong>ng/profit structure(some exception in<br />

China), while mainstream will call such test "Immoral"(they declare nonlocality<br />

cannot have any physical effect etc), & can easily obfuscate experiments by<br />

pressuring to set con<strong>di</strong>tions that are design to have weaker effect(speculating from<br />

other me<strong>di</strong>cal tampering & numerous consistent examples of <strong>di</strong>sruptive energy tech<br />

experiment tampering by mainstream or its supporting & parasitic groups).<br />

• This issue can be equated to exaggerated example of marathon running in which<br />

not all runners(e.g. equating as healer) necessarily runs marathon under 2h20mins<br />

(e.g. equivalent of meaning as strong healing effect), and some run at 3hrs(eg barely<br />

marginal effect), and large majority runs marathon at 3.5hrs and more (eg zero<br />

effect or worse). So if randomly select 10 marathon runners(eg healers) to test "in<br />

order to get fair controlled results" as average, there might be no effect at all, or<br />

one or two strong effect would become "statistical error" - hence still no effect at all.<br />

Furthermore, gathering of high performance healers itself would become "selective<br />

data" and becomes void as qualified research by "trusted scientific protocol".<br />

-->>cont:<br />

270<br />

linke<strong>di</strong>n.com/in/newnaturepara<strong>di</strong>gm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!