Fusione Fredda, Tesla, Onda Scalare, Campo di Torsione, «Energia libera»..= Tutti Pseudo-Scienza?(Riepilogo italiano) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, "Free Energy", "Over-Unity".. = All Fake Science?
Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
Il nuovo paradigma sulle tecnologie energetiche con geo-socio-impatto finanziario / The new paradigm on energy technology with geo-socio-financial impact
“ Pseudo Science” Free Energy Aneutronic & Conventional Fusion 2: Involved Groups -Super Compact Fusion: Dense Plasma Focus/Lawrenceville Plasma Physics(Lerner), Infra cost 0.1% of mainstream fusion, no radiation(same as ambient), use Boron, no H2 isotope, Inventor tech link, US Navy backing, Almost mainstream accepted, Experimental success results since ’09, yet difficulty getting funds, Other aneutronic fusion: Bussard- EMC2 success shelved?, Russia involved private US company big name funded Tri Alpha: really only 0.5milli second sustained fusion?, • Long sustained fusion including conventional thermonuclear with suspected possibility for Net Energy Gain(Max Planck Institute: Wendelstein 7-X[uses combined mobius strip like Stellarator], Lockheed Martin- Farnsworth link, B Maglich: Migma cell, Chinese Institute of Physical Science: Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak+), • Official Energy Positive: National Ignition Facility(NIF US) in 2014 is often quoted as first time ever, but JAERI/JAEA(Japan)/Hitachi/Toshiba had repeatable & sustainable practically Q=1.25 success at ITER JT-60 since 1998 but often interpreted as invalid due to actual tritium was not used. Improved JT-60SA(inductive coil, longer pulse) is officially under construction since 2013 till 2019(as of Feb 2016 still 10% incomplete) -->>cont: linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada 177
“ Pseudo Science” Free Energy Aneutronic & Conventional Fusion 2: Q>1 • -->>cont: -Super Compact Fusion: JAERI/JAEA: Note new JAERI/JAEA system is being built to test how long it can gain energy continuously with how much more than Q>1.25, not to test whether if it can produce more energy than input. European JET had unofficial success in 2004? but then shutdown for major upgrades... • Considering Western mainstream debunking/selective ignoring of overwhelming accumulating evidence of economically disruptive non mainstream LENR or Fusion like mechanics since 1925, even Huemul Project(R Richter) in 1950s Argentina could have also achieved Q>1 fusion? • Other types with large funding are not reported to have net energy gain: Various magetized types etc. Even home made sustained fusion itself can be made, particularly low powered super compact Fusors(Farnsworth invention),(Jam Edwards, Ta Wilson+). Other types: eg Dusty Nano Fusion(Gyö Egely)+ -->cont: linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada 178
- Page 127 and 128: Energy From Vast Biomass 28, Biomas
- Page 129 and 130: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 131 and 132: Energy From Vast Biomass 32, SWC De
- Page 133 and 134: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 135 and 136: New Perspective -“Lowest Cost”
- Page 137 and 138: Energy From Vast Biomass 38, Algae
- Page 139 and 140: Energy From Vast Biomass 40, Peat,
- Page 141 and 142: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 143 and 144: Lowest Cost Energy: Clean Under-Uti
- Page 145 and 146: Mainstream “Pseudoscientific Free
- Page 147 and 148: LENR-Cavitation-vs- & Eniology Link
- Page 149 and 150: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 151 and 152: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 153 and 154: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy ,
- Page 155 and 156: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 157 and 158: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 159 and 160: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 161 and 162: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 163 and 164: 's HHO, OxyHydrogen Gas 9: Ohmasa G
- Page 165 and 166: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy C
- Page 167 and 168: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy C
- Page 169 and 170: 'sFree Energy Compressed Air/Vortex
- Page 171 and 172: 'sFree Energy Compressed Air/Vortex
- Page 173 and 174: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy R
- Page 175 and 176: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 177: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy H
- Page 181 and 182: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy F
- Page 183 and 184: “ Pseudo Science” Free Energy O
- Page 185 and 186: World Trend; When Starts Establishi
- Page 187 and 188: Trend; When Starts Establishing New
- Page 189 and 190: World Trend; When Starts Establishi
- Page 191 and 192: Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Mee
- Page 193 and 194: Free Energy Challenge: Quest to Mee
- Page 195 and 196: LAWs of THERMO-DYNAMICS: vs Invento
- Page 197 and 198: Thoughts of & “Dissident” Scien
- Page 199 and 200: Thoughts of & “Dissident” Scien
- Page 201 and 202: Thoughts of & “Dissident” Scien
- Page 203 and 204: Torsion Field / Scalar Wave 6: Stan
- Page 205 and 206: & “Dissident” Scientists: “Fa
- Page 207 and 208: & “Dissident” Scientists: “Fa
- Page 209 and 210: & “Dissident” Scientists’ Far
- Page 211 and 212: Scalar "Wave" 3: Standing Wave, Nor
- Page 213 and 214: Scalar "Wave" 5: Long Distance Wire
- Page 215 and 216: Scalar "Wave" 7: Radionics: How It
- Page 217 and 218: Scalar "Wave" 9: Radionics Applicat
- Page 219 and 220: : Spin, Electrical Effects etc •
- Page 221 and 222: : Electron, E-Field, Particle Bomba
- Page 223 and 224: & “Dissident” Scientists: “Fa
- Page 225 and 226: & “Dissident” Scientists: “Fa
- Page 227 and 228: : Nano Geometry In Water Effects
“ <strong>Pseudo</strong> <strong>Science</strong>” <strong>Free</strong> Energy<br />
Aneutronic & Conventional <strong>Fusion</strong> 2: Involved Groups<br />
-Super Compact <strong>Fusion</strong>: Dense Plasma Focus/Lawrenceville Plasma<br />
Physics(Lerner), Infra cost 0.1% of mainstream fusion, no ra<strong>di</strong>ation(same as<br />
ambient), use Boron, no H2 isotope, Inventor tech link, US Navy backing,<br />
Almost mainstream accepted, Experimental success results since ’09, yet<br />
<strong>di</strong>fficulty getting funds, Other aneutronic fusion: Bussard- EMC2 success<br />
shelved?, Russia involved private US company big name funded Tri Alpha:<br />
really only 0.5milli second sustained fusion?,<br />
• Long sustained fusion inclu<strong>di</strong>ng conventional thermonuclear with suspected<br />
possibility for Net Energy Gain(Max Planck Institute: Wendelstein 7-X[uses<br />
combined mobius strip like Stellarator], Lockheed Martin- Farnsworth link, B<br />
Maglich: Migma cell, Chinese Institute of Physical <strong>Science</strong>: Experimental<br />
Advanced Superconducting Tokamak+),<br />
• Official Energy Positive: National Ignition Facility(NIF US) in 2014 is often<br />
quoted as first time ever, but JAERI/JAEA(Japan)/Hitachi/Toshiba had<br />
repeatable & sustainable practically Q=1.25 success at ITER JT-60 since 1998<br />
but often interpreted as invalid due to actual tritium was not used. Improved<br />
JT-60SA(inductive coil, longer pulse) is officially under construction since 2013<br />
till 2019(as of Feb 2016 still 10% incomplete) -->>cont:<br />
linke<strong>di</strong>n.com/in/newnaturepara<strong>di</strong>gm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada<br />
177