enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...
enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ... enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...
when a compound preverb is added, the verb or this preverb is complicated by the particle and there is gi phonetic sequence; b) when the verb is of the object structure, it is in the second person and g morpheme is followed by the i morpheme of the subject or object version; c) the diphthongization is due to the existence of o phoneme after the preverb e-: e + o > jo, which causes palatal sequences ejo-, jo-. 3. ê > j or ê > j > 0 is the quality of the substantive determiner, the genitive morpheme ê moves into j both in compounds and common collocations with almost no exceptions. The indicated process is characteristic of all Kartvelian languages. Thus, it represents a common Kartvelian phenomenon. There are some exceptions: uÄaêi > uÄaj “elder”, þveêi > þvej “old”, oêi > oj “hundred” (with compound numerals in certain phonetic positions), boêi > boj “boy” (vocative), aêo / aêi > aj “over here”, in whose structure the iotization of the ê phoneme is interpreted in a different way (Comp. E. Lomtadze). On the basis of the published text material and our field trip entries it is established that iotization is characteristic of the whole Megrelian, but this process is not uniform according to the dialects, in particular, l > j and ê > j processes, as well as i > j processes , are confirmed in Senakian-Martvilian. On the other hand, only the latter is characteristic of Zugdidian-Samurzakanoan. 42
marine ivaniSvili enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi _ I-II, 2009 mcenareTa saxelebi qarTvelurSi: `kowaxuri~ zurab sarjvelaZem qarT. kowaxur- kowaxur-i: megr. korwoxul- /korwoxul-i `kowaxuri~ fuZeebis Sepirispirebis safuZvelze qarTulzanuri erTianobis xanisTvis aRadgina *kowaxur- arqetipi (sarjvelaZe 1999:127). kowaxuri dasturdeba sulxan-sabas leqsikonSi. SesaZloa, qarTuli kowaxur-is Sesatyvisi iyos megruli korwoxul- (
- Page 1 and 2: ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilis
- Page 3: krebuli eZRvneba zurab sarjvelaZis
- Page 6 and 7: ise leqsikologia-etimologiis sistem
- Page 8 and 9: zurab (zura) sarjvelaZe minda baton
- Page 10 and 11: saCinoa is faqti, rom efTvime mTawm
- Page 12 and 13: gvisturi xatis agebisas safuZvlad m
- Page 14 and 15: TxvevaSi qarTul-zanuri erTianobis d
- Page 16 and 17: `qarTvelur enaTa etimologiuri leqsi
- Page 18 and 19: Iza Chantladze The Significance of
- Page 20 and 21: 13. a. froneli (a. yifSiZe), didebu
- Page 22 and 23: 1967 4. x da à grafemaTa da /Ã/ d
- Page 24 and 25: 1979 33. wyvetilisa da II xolmeobiT
- Page 26 and 27: 1987 68. eklesiaste (eklesiastes Zv
- Page 28 and 29: 1998 101. mca nawilakis erTi funqci
- Page 30 and 31: 134. galaktionis erTi leqsis zogi a
- Page 32 and 33: enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi _ I-II, 2
- Page 34 and 35: soflebSi Caweril teqstebSi dasturde
- Page 36 and 37: ga-Á-wuRG (Tiq Tis Tina `man mas i
- Page 38 and 39: Rvrelis formantiseuli -S sakmaod xS
- Page 40 and 41: Semdgom i > Á gadasvliT. vinaidan,
- Page 44 and 45: vfiqrobT, am mcenaris aRmniSvnel qa
- Page 46 and 47: vaxtang imnaiSvili enaTmecnierebis
- Page 48 and 49: imnaiSvilis werili, 4 romelSic, Zir
- Page 50 and 51: 17) endersis gadayeneba sabolood ga
- Page 52 and 53: prozaSi am avtorebs zemoT dasaxeleb
- Page 54 and 55: 2) ugzoba, ufarexoba (g. tabiZe, VI
- Page 56 and 57: ucxouridanaa Semosuli qarTulSi, maT
- Page 58 and 59: 7) kvireebi (j. beTaneli, gancdili
- Page 60 and 61: Vakhtang Imnaishvili Some Questions
- Page 62 and 63: arTi orkoli Rvini qofCuni, arTi pap
- Page 64 and 65: Guram Kartozia The Formation of the
- Page 66 and 67: • arakanonikuri TanxmovanTkompleq
- Page 68 and 69: TanxmovanTgamyar `i~-sTan dakavSire
- Page 70 and 71: literatura gigiberia 1958: e. gigib
- Page 72 and 73: qeTevan margiani-subari enaTmecnier
- Page 74 and 75: q. xecxEpiE (`albaT {mo}etacebina~)
- Page 76 and 77: pirobiT-SedegobiTi I áÄÌóÒÉ _
- Page 78 and 79: damana meliqiSvili enaTmecnierebis
- Page 80 and 81: Cveni kvleva emyareba qarTuli enis
- Page 82 and 83: #2. seriebis istoriuli urTierTmimar
- Page 84 and 85: I vnebiTi gvari 1. Tu davtovebT say
- Page 86 and 87: esiyvaruleba eamxanageba,.. da sxva
- Page 88 and 89: zmnebisa da maTi konversiuli formeb
- Page 90 and 91: usrulaspeqtiani myofadis gamoxatva
when a compound preverb is added, the verb or this preverb is complicated by the<br />
particle and there is gi phonetic sequence; b) when the verb is of the object<br />
structure, it is in the second person and g morpheme is followed by the i<br />
morpheme of the subject or object version; c) the diphthongization is due to the<br />
existence of o phoneme after the preverb e-: e + o > jo, which causes palatal<br />
sequences ejo-, jo-.<br />
3. ê > j or ê > j > 0 is the quality of the substantive determiner, the genitive<br />
morpheme ê moves into j both in compounds and common collocations with<br />
almost no exceptions. The indicated process is characteristic of all Kartvelian<br />
languages. Thus, it represents a common Kartvelian phenomenon. There are some<br />
exceptions: uÄaêi > uÄaj “elder”, þveêi > þvej “old”, oêi > oj “hundred”<br />
(with compound numerals in certain phonetic positions), boêi > boj “boy”<br />
(vocative), aêo / aêi > aj “over here”, in whose structure the iotization of the ê<br />
phoneme is interpreted in a different way (Comp. E. Lomtadze).<br />
On the basis of the published text material and our field trip entries it is established<br />
that iotization is characteristic of the whole Megrelian, but this process is not<br />
uniform according to the dialects, in particular, l > j and ê > j processes, as<br />
well as i > j processes , are confirmed in Senakian-Martvilian. On the other<br />
hand, only the latter is characteristic of Zugdidian-Samurzakanoan.<br />
42