enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...
enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ... enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi ISSUES OF LINGUISTICS - Tbilisi State ...
cesebis dafiqsireba da aucilebelia am kategoriebs Soris ierarqiuli mimarTebebis dadgena. ierarqiebi avlenen enobrivi sistemis funqcionirebis ganmsazRvrel mniSvnelovan faqtorebs. literatura asaTiani 1994 : r. asaTiani, qarTvelur enaTa tipologiis sakiTxebi, `mecniereba~, Tbilisi. bretveiti 1973 : K. Braithweithe, Case Shift and Verb Concord in Georgian. PhD thesis. Department of Linguistics, the University of Texas at Austin. gagua 1953 : r. gagua, zmnis cvla gramatikuli klas-kategoriis niSnis mixedviT bacbur enaSi, ike VIII. diqsoni 1994 : R. M. W. Dixon, Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. kibriki 1997 : Beyond Subject and Object: Toward a Comprehensive Relational Typology. LinguisticTypology 1, Berlin-New Jork: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997, p. 279-346. maWavariani, SavxeliSvili 1998 : m. maWavariani da b. SavxeliSvili, ergatiuloba da bunebiTi (pirveladi) zmnebi wova-TuSurSi, `gza enisaken~, Tbilisi. rogava 1953 : g. rogava, klasiani uRvlilebis pirian uRvlilebaSi gadasvla iberiul-kavkasiur enebSi, moambe-XIV, 7, `mecniereba~, Tbilisi. SaniZe 1973 : a. SaniZe, qarTuli enis gramatikis safuZvlebi, `mecniereba~, Tbilisi. WrelaSvili 2002 : k. WrelaSvili, wova-TuSuri ena, Tsu gam-ba, Tbilisi. holiski 1987 : D. A. Holisky, The Case of the Intransitive Subject in Tsova-tush (Batsbi). Lingua, 71, 103-132. Rusudan Asatiani Dominant Category of Language and the Peculiarities of Ergative Constructions in Tsova-tush and Georgian Summary Georgian, according to the general typology, is defined as a mixed language, more precisely, as a role-deixis-oriented language, but the same qualification would apply to Batsbi (or Tsova-tush, the designation now preferably used by native speakers). According to the suggested theoretical approach for a comprehensive description of languages, it is not enough to define languages as merely mixed systems, but also state which hierarchies they make use of. The hierarchies are defined according to the priority given to marked categories during linguistic realizations: they reflect dynamic synchronic and/or diachronic processes of linguistic structuring. 318
Although Tsova-tush is similar to Georgian in one respect (both can be qualified as role-deixis-oriented languages), it also differs from Georgian in a significant way: it seems that due to the contacts with the Georgian language, Tsova-tush distinguishes the I/II versus III dichotomy, although its formalization takes place only after the grammaticalization of the class category which is basic for the prototypical ergative constructions. That is, it keeps the original category as the stronger one and puts it on a higher position in the hierarchy. We suppose that hierarchies can give us a new understanding of the nature of linguistic changes in the situation of language interferences: when new categories or structures rise in languages because of contacts (or because of internally motivated variations), the old ones do not disappear, on the contrary, they occupy a high position in a hierarchically organized linguistic system of grammatical categories. 319
- Page 268 and 269: saTargmni sityvis semantikas. 3 amg
- Page 270 and 271: eu;cesqai aRTquma 2, euvch, aRnaTqu
- Page 272 and 273: zemoCamoTvlili semantikuri jgufis s
- Page 274 and 275: paralelur adgils (34 21 , 80 11 ) e
- Page 276 and 277: Ana Kharanauli The Vocabulary of th
- Page 278 and 279: amave leqsikonSi literaturul wyaroe
- Page 280 and 281: xis erovnuli xasiaTis gamosavlenad.
- Page 282 and 283: gancalkevebul erTeulTa Tavgadasaval
- Page 284 and 285: (30): mas uSmago vin miendos, vin m
- Page 286 and 287: gavixsenoT akakisY`gamzrdeli~: `Sen
- Page 288 and 289: "Freundschaft" ist eine der wichtig
- Page 290 and 291: vania da mravalferovani (Sinaarsis
- Page 292 and 293: jajRani _ es sityva ar aris etimolo
- Page 294 and 295: `metyvelebas~; 1220 wels odnav Secv
- Page 296 and 297: dialeqtSi RurRuli `gajavrebas, Cuma
- Page 298 and 299: maRal tonalobas gamoxatavs; sainter
- Page 300 and 301: amaz qurdaZe enaTmecnierebis sakiTx
- Page 302 and 303: saerTod kavkasielis da, bunebrivia,
- Page 304 and 305: arc am sityvebis ganmartebisas da a
- Page 306 and 307: ЧОНГУРИ - гей, приех
- Page 308 and 309: usudan asaTiani enaTmecnierebis sak
- Page 310 and 311: seriebs Soris arsebuli sxvaobebi. u
- Page 312 and 313: manis rigis piris niSnebi. axla, Tu
- Page 314 and 315: 5. mravalpirianobis ZiriTadi funqci
- Page 316 and 317: SemTxvevaSic, rodesac zmna aris erT
- Page 320 and 321: enaTmecnierebis sakiTxebi _ I-II, 2
- Page 322 and 323: since some basic transitive verbs,
- Page 324 and 325: (2) mo-v-k’l-en "I killed them" m
- Page 326 and 327: Notes 1 The research reported here
- Page 328 and 329: Zveli qarTuli enis aRwera warmoadge
- Page 330 and 331: * * * eTer soselia, semantikuri uni
- Page 332 and 333: Sinaarsi zurab sarjvelaZe _70 daman
- Page 334 and 335: sofio sarjvelaZe _ xelnawerTa erovn
- Page 336: gamomcemlobis redaqtori cira jiSkar
Although Tsova-tush is similar to Georgian in one respect (both can be qualified as<br />
role-deixis-oriented languages), it also differs from Georgian in a significant way:<br />
it seems that due to the contacts with the Georgian language, Tsova-tush<br />
distinguishes the I/II versus III dichotomy, although its formalization takes place<br />
only after the grammaticalization of the class category which is basic for the<br />
prototypical ergative constructions. That is, it keeps the original category as the<br />
stronger one and puts it on a higher position in the hierarchy.<br />
We suppose that hierarchies can give us a new understanding of the nature of<br />
linguistic changes in the situation of language interferences: when new categories<br />
or structures rise in languages because of contacts (or because of internally<br />
motivated variations), the old ones do not disappear, on the contrary, they occupy a<br />
high position in a hierarchically organized linguistic system of grammatical<br />
categories.<br />
319
Change language