#3(34)'12
#3(34)'12 #3(34)'12
POSSESSION PROTECTION IN CONTINENTAL EUROPEAN LAW KETEVAN KOCHASHVILI Assistant Professor at the Tbilisi State University, Private Law. PHD Presented Article describes so-called possession protection problem. Originating from the Roman Law, recognition of a person as a possessor is related with the independent possession capability. Possession protection means protection of a person individually, based on the fact of possession, independently from jura in re. Decision made in the possession process determines condition of parties in the following process. Plaintiff, that maintained possession on the disputed items, is respondent on the following trail. Burden of proof lies with the plaintiff and protection of respondent’s position is simplified: there is a presumption that possessor is owner. Possession protection is typical for the Continental European law. Relevant norms are strengthened by German, French, Italian civil codifications. As far as Georgian Civil Code is similar to the European private law, it also stipulates protection on possession. Common Law system does not recognize possession protection institute, where protection of property and possession is carried out through delict law suits because their violation is considered as delict. In civil doctrine, theories on the protection of possession are divided as absolute and relational theories. Relational theories search for the reason of possession beyond possession, for example, protection of public order, maintenance of civil peace, protection of a person from violence and providing safeguards for the interests of an owner. According to the absolute theories, through providing pubic order, it protects free will among the individuals. 27
marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni mesame pirTa interesebis dacva warmomadgenlobaSi (saqarTvelosa da germaniis samoqalaqo kodeqsis mixedviT) TaTa erqvania ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universtetis iuridiuli fakultetis magistri, ganaTlebis xarisxis ganviTarebis erovnuli centris ganaTlebis aRiarebis sammarTvelos koordinatori I. Sesavali samoqalaqo samarTalSi moqmedi kerZo avtonomiis principisa da saqarTvelos konstituciiT garantirebuli pirovnebis Tavisufali ganviTarebis ZiriTadi uflebis realizaciis erTerTi saintereso forma rwmunebulebiTi urTierTobaa. rwmunebulebiT urTierTobaSi mxareTa interesebis Tanafardobis dacva xorcieldeba kerZo avtonomiis principis uzrunvelyofiT, romlis moqmedebis sfero sruldeba iq, sadac iwyeba sxvisi moqmedebis Tavisufleba 1 . warmomadgenlobaSi mxareTa interesebis Tanafardobis dacva mniSvnelovnadaa damokidebuli saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis mier regulaciebsa da mis swor gamoyenebaze sasamarTlo praqtikaSi. statiis mizania saqarTvelos samoqalaqo kodeqsis (SemdgomSi _ ssk) warmomadgenlobis momwesrigebeli muxlebis germaniis samoqalaqo kodeqsis (SemdgomSi _ gsk) Sesabamis paragrafebTan SedarebiTi da logikur-sistemuri analizis safuZvelze, saqarTvelos samoqalaqo samarTalSi warmomadgenlobis institutis farglebSi mxared moqmedi mesame piris interesebis dacvis amsaxveli debulebebis Seswavla, problemuri regulirebebis warmoCena da maTi srulyofisaTvis novatoruli winadadebebis Se- Tavazeba. 2 28
- Page 1 and 2: N3 '12 N3 #3(34)’12
- Page 3 and 4: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni Justice
- Page 5 and 6: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni 91 gior
- Page 7 and 8: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni buli, r
- Page 9 and 10: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni me-2 mu
- Page 11 and 12: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni notariu
- Page 13 and 14: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni gansjad
- Page 15 and 16: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni mflobel
- Page 17 and 18: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni pirs, u
- Page 19 and 20: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni rangeTS
- Page 21 and 22: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni Tu mflo
- Page 23 and 24: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni preroga
- Page 25 and 26: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni SeniSvn
- Page 27: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni 44 Êî
- Page 31 and 32: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni ssk-is
- Page 33 and 34: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni rulebis
- Page 35 and 36: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni mesame
- Page 37 and 38: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni ndoba x
- Page 39 and 40: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni iqneba
- Page 41 and 42: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni SeniSvn
- Page 43 and 44: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni 64 H.Pa
- Page 45 and 46: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni PROTECT
- Page 47 and 48: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni samarTl
- Page 49 and 50: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni zneobri
- Page 51 and 52: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni saojaxo
- Page 53 and 54: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni SeniSvn
- Page 55 and 56: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni nebis g
- Page 57 and 58: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni saubari
- Page 59 and 60: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni Tanaswo
- Page 61 and 62: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni monawil
- Page 63 and 64: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni 21. Eur
- Page 65 and 66: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni FREEDOM
- Page 67 and 68: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni xelSekr
- Page 69 and 70: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni saxelmw
- Page 71 and 72: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni davebis
- Page 73 and 74: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni samarTa
- Page 75 and 76: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni SeniSvn
- Page 77 and 78: marTlmsajuleba N3 da kanoni sahaero
POSSESSION PROTECTION<br />
IN CONTINENTAL EUROPEAN<br />
LAW<br />
KETEVAN KOCHASHVILI<br />
Assistant Professor at the Tbilisi State University, Private Law. PHD<br />
Presented Article describes so-called possession protection problem. Originating<br />
from the Roman Law, recognition of a person as a possessor is related with<br />
the independent possession capability. Possession protection means protection of<br />
a person individually, based on the fact of possession, independently from jura in<br />
re.<br />
Decision made in the possession process determines condition of parties in<br />
the following process. Plaintiff, that maintained possession on the disputed items,<br />
is respondent on the following trail. Burden of proof lies with the plaintiff and<br />
protection of respondent’s position is simplified: there is a presumption that possessor<br />
is owner.<br />
Possession protection is typical for the Continental European law. Relevant<br />
norms are strengthened by German, French, Italian civil codifications. As far as<br />
Georgian Civil Code is similar to the European private law, it also stipulates protection<br />
on possession. Common Law system does not recognize possession protection<br />
institute, where protection of property and possession is carried out through<br />
delict law suits because their violation is considered as delict.<br />
In civil doctrine, theories on the protection of possession are divided as absolute<br />
and relational theories. Relational theories search for the reason of possession<br />
beyond possession, for example, protection of public order, maintenance of<br />
civil peace, protection of a person from violence and providing safeguards for the<br />
interests of an owner. According to the absolute theories, through providing pubic<br />
order, it protects free will among the individuals.<br />
27