#3(34)'12

67
WebMD, Webster’s New World Medical Dictionary,third edition, Wiley Publishing, 2008, 309
68
Jacobs M., Welss Conference on Adoption Law: Procreation Through Art: Why The Adoption
Process should not Apply, Cap.U.L.Rev., Vol. 35, 2006, 399.
69
http://www.theafa.org/article/embryo-donationprospective-recipients.
70
saqarTvelos kanoni `Svilad ayvanisa da mindobiT aRzrdis Sesaxeb~,
gamoqveynebulia ssm, 50, 31/12/2009, ZalaSia 1/01/2010.
71
igive kanonis me-5 muxli, ix.: agreTve, saqarTvelos Sromis, janmrTelobisa
da socialuri dacvis ministris #50/n brZaneba `Svilad ayvanis
procedurebisa da formebis damtkicebis Sesaxeb~, gamoqveynebulia ssm, 23,
26/02/2010, ZalaSia 01/03/2010.
72
igive kanonis me-15 muxlis me-6 nawili.
73
Anderson M., Are you My Mommy? A Call For Regulation Of Embryo Donation, Cap.U.L. Rev.,
Vol. 35, 2006, 607.
74
Kovacs G., The Subfertility Handbook: A clinician’s Guide, 2 nd ed., Cambridge University Press,
2011, 172.
75
Anderson M., Are you My Mommy? A Call For Regulation Of Embryo Donation, Cap.U.L. Rev.,
Vol. 35, 2006, 607.
76
Kovacs G., The Subfertility Handbook : A Clinician’s Guide, 2 nd ed., Cambridge University Press,
2011, 166.
77
Cahn N., Accidental Incest: Drawing the Line-or the Curtain? For Reproductive Technology, 32
Harvard J.L.&Gender, Vol. 58, 2009,103.
78
saqarTvelos sakonstitucio sasamarTlos 2008 wlis 30 oqtombris #2/3/406-
408 gadawyvetileba.
79
Jacobs M., Welss Conference on Adoption Law: Procreation Through Art: Why The Adoption
Process should not Apply, Cap.U.L.Rev., Vol. 35, 2006, 399.
80
Cahm N., No Secrets: Openess and Donor-Concieved Half-Siblings, Cap.U.L.Rev., Vol. 39,
2011, 333.
81
Kohm L.M., Well Conference On Adoption Law: What’s My Place In This World? A response To
Professor Ellen Waldman’s, What Do We Tell the Children?, Cap.U.L.Rev., Vol. 35, 2006, 568.
82
iqve.
83
kublaSvili k., ZiriTadi uflebebi, Tb., 2008, gv. 106.
84
Cahn N., Accidental Incest: Drawing the Line-or the Curtain? For Reproductive Technology, 32
Harvard J.L.&Gender, Vol. 58, 2009,102.
85
iqve.
86
http://donorsiblingregistry.com
87
http://www.hfea.gov.uk/5838.html
88
Robertson J., Reproductive Technology And Reproductive Rights: In The Beginning: The Legal
Status Of Early Embryos, Va.L.Rev., Vol. 76, 1990, 512.
89
`adamianis uflebebisa da biomedicinis Sesaxeb~ konvenciis ganmartebiTi
memorandumi.
90
iqve.
91
Katz K., Wells Conference On Adoptioon Law, The Legal Status Of The Ex Uteroo Embryo:
Implications For Adoption Law, Cap. U.L. Rev., Vol. 35, 2006, 337.
92
Sauer M., Principles of oocute and embryo donation, Springer, 1998, 223.
93
Kindregan Ch., McBrien M., Assisted reproductive technology; a lawyer’s guide to emerging law
and science, American Bar Association, 2006,122.
94
Sauer M., Principles of oocute and embryo donation, , Springer, 1998, 253
95
Sead. Robertson J., Reproductive Technology And Reproductive Rights: In The Beginning: The
Legal Status Of Early Embryos, Va.L.Rev., Vol. 76, 1990, 514, romlis mixedviT,
embrionis komercializacia akrZalul unda iqnes, magram donorebs SeiZleba
daekisroT embrionis Seqmnis xarjebi.
96
Kindregan Ch., McBrien M., Assisted reproductive technology; a lawyer’s guide to emerging law
and science, American Bar Association, 2006, 123.
97
iqve.
98
Âðèòò Ô., Ëîãèêî-ôèëîñîñîôñêèåèñëåäîâàíèÿ, Èçáðàííèå òðóäû, 1986, 300.
miTiTebulia: naWyebia g., kanoniT aukrZalavis nebadarTulobis Sesaxeb, Jur.
`samarTali~, #1, 1992,19.
131