Duns Scotus-Bibliography - The Catholic University of America

278 Duns Scotus Bibliography
HENRY OF HARCLAY
Editions
3161 — Dales, R. C. “Henricus de Harclay: quaestio ‘Utrum mundus potuit fuisse ab
aeterno.’” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge 58 (1983): 223–55.
3162 — Fiorentino, Francesco, and Chris Schabel. “Henry of Harclay’s Prologue to His
Sentences Commentary, Question 1: Theology as a Science.” Recherches de Théologie
et Philosophie médiévales 78 (2011): 97–159.
3163 — Gál, Gedeon. “Henricus de Harclay: quaestio de significato conceptus universalis.”
Franciscan Studies 31 (1971): 178–224.
3164 — Henninger, Mark G. “Henry of Harclay on the Formal Distinction in the Trinity.”
Franciscan Studies 41 (1981): 250–335. [Text Edition: pp. 280–335]
3165 — Henninger, Mark G. “Henry of Harclay’s Question on Relations.” Mediaeval
Studies 49 (1987): 76–123.
3166 — Henninger, Mark G. “Henry of Harclay’s Questions on Divine Prescience and
Predestination.” Franciscan Studies 40 (1980): 167–243. [Text Edition: 195–243]
3167 — Henry of Harclay, Ordinary Questions, ed. Mark G. Henninger. 2 vols. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2008.
3168 — Maurer, Armand A. “Henry of Harclay’s Disputed Question on the Plurality of
Forms.” In Essays in Honor of Anton Pegis, edited by J. R. O’Donnell, 125–59.
Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1974.
3169 — Maurer, Armand A. “Henry of Harclay’s Question on the Univocity of Being.”
Mediaeval Studies 16 (1954): 1–18. Reprinted in: Being and Knowing: Studies in
Thomas Aquinas and Later Medieval Philosophers, 203–27. Papers in Mediaeval
Studies 10. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990.
3170 — Maurer, Armand A. “Henry of Harclay’s Questions on Immortality.” Mediaeval
Studies 19 (1957): 79–107. Reprinted in: Being and Knowing: Studies in Thomas
Aquinas and Later Medieval Philosophers, 229–71. Papers in Mediaeval Studies 10.
Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1990.
3171 — Richter, Vladimir. “Zu der frühen Rezeptionsgeschichte von Scotus’ Reportatio.”
In Studien zum literarischen Werk von Johannes Duns Scotus [nr. 431], 79–97.
[Contains the edition of distinction 2 quaestio 1 of Henry of Harclay: Utrum necessaria
ratione et evidenti possit demonstrari quod in entibus sit aliquod ens simpliciter primum
a nullo alio causatum, pp. 86–94]