13.01.2014 Views

0-TESTO COMPLETO.pdf - Fondazione Santa Lucia

0-TESTO COMPLETO.pdf - Fondazione Santa Lucia

0-TESTO COMPLETO.pdf - Fondazione Santa Lucia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sezione III: Attività per progetti<br />

with PBS and incubated overnight with 1 ml of TSB broth containing antibiotic<br />

in a concentration higher than its MIC. Polymer disks will then be<br />

washed twice with PBS to remove planktonic cells, and CFU values will be<br />

enumerated by sonication, vortex agitation and dilution plating as described<br />

above.<br />

Expected results: Polymers loaded with Dispersin B plus Vancomycin will<br />

resist colonization and biofilm formation more efficiently that polymers<br />

loaded with Dispersin B or antimicrobial agent alone.<br />

POTENTIAL PROBLEMS<br />

Dispersin B may not sensitize bacteria to killing by Vancomycin. In this<br />

case an other antibiotic (Tygecycline or Daptomycin) will be tested.<br />

Dispersin B may not sensitize S. aureus biofilms to killing by Vancomycin,<br />

possibly due to the small amount of PNAG present in S. aureus<br />

biofilms [Izano et al. 2008a]. In this case, an alternative matrix-degrading<br />

enzyme such as DNase I could be employed.<br />

Novel polymers may not adsorb Vancomycin. In this case, we may vary<br />

the polymer chemical features according to Vancomycin properties, or<br />

increase the concentration of functional groups per polymer repetitive unit so<br />

that a higher number of antibiotic molecules could be coordinated by the<br />

polymer.<br />

Dispersin B and Vancomycin may be released too rapidly from the loaded<br />

polymers. This problem could be overcome by incorporating pore-forming<br />

molecules such as albumin or polyethylenglycol into the polymer in order to<br />

modulate antibiotic desorption [Donelli et al. 2006; Ruggeri et al. 2007].<br />

– Aslam S, Trautner BW, Ramanathan V, Darouiche RO (2007) Antimicrob Agents<br />

Chemother 51:1556-1558.<br />

– Bleyer AJ (2007) Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:1073-1078.<br />

– Campanac C, Pineau L, Payard A, Baziard-Mouysset G, Roques C (2002) Antimicrob<br />

Agents Chemother 46:1469-1474.<br />

– Chaignon P, Sadovskaya I, Ragunath C, Ramasubbu N, Kaplan JB, Jabbouri S<br />

(2007) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 75:125-132.<br />

– Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Science 284:1318-1322.<br />

– Donelli G, De PP, Fadda G, Marone P, Nicoletti G, Varaldo PE (2001) J Chemother<br />

13 (Special issue 1):251-262.<br />

– Donelli G, Francolini I (2001) J Chemother 13:595-606.<br />

– Donelli, G, Francolini I, Piozzi A, Di Rosa R, Marconi W (2002) J Chemother<br />

14:501-507<br />

– Donelli G, Francolini I, Romoli D, Guaglianone E, Piozzi A, Ragunath C, Kaplan<br />

JB (2007) Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:2733-2740.<br />

– Donelli G, Francolini I, Ruggeri V, Guaglianone E, D’Ilario L, Piozzi A (2006)<br />

J Appl Microbiol 100:615-622.<br />

– Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Clin Microbiol Rev 15:167-193.<br />

– Fux CA, Wilson S, Stoodley P (2004) J Bacteriol 186:4486-4491.<br />

800 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!