13.01.2014 Views

0-TESTO COMPLETO.pdf - Fondazione Santa Lucia

0-TESTO COMPLETO.pdf - Fondazione Santa Lucia

0-TESTO COMPLETO.pdf - Fondazione Santa Lucia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sezione III: Attività per progetti<br />

BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE<br />

Bacterial infections are frequently associated with indwelling medical<br />

devices.<br />

In recent decades, the development of novel polymeric biomaterials<br />

has allowed the manufacturing of a large number of medical devices<br />

including orthopaedic prostheses, heart valves, intravascular catheters and<br />

biliary stents, providing clinicians with useful means to improve healthcare.<br />

However, infectious complications, including bloodstream infections,<br />

septic thrombophlebitis, endocarditis, metastatic infections and sepsis, are<br />

often associated with their use [Costerton et al. 1999; Donelli et al. 2001;<br />

Parsek, Singh 2003]. It is well known that microorganisms adhere to<br />

implanted medical devices by forming a sessile multicellular community<br />

encased in a hydrated matrix of polysaccharides and proteins, the socalled<br />

biofilm [Donlan, Costerton 2002]. As the biofilm thickness<br />

increases, there is a progressive dispersal of single cells and/or bacterial<br />

clusters of different sizes which can be considered the main promoters of<br />

the infectious process [Fux et al. 2004]. Treatment of device-related infections<br />

with conventional antimicrobials frequently fails because biofilmgrowing<br />

microorganisms are much more resistant to antimicrobial agents<br />

than planktonic cells [Stewart, Costerton 2001]. Hypothetical mechanisms<br />

for biofilm resistance include the slow growth of persister cells within<br />

biofilms [Shah et al. 2006] and the restricted penetration of antibiotics<br />

within the biofilm due to the exopolysaccharide matrix produced by the<br />

microorganisms themselves [Mah, O’Toole 2001]. Depending on the<br />

involved body site and the mode of implant, different fungal and bacterial<br />

species may contribute to the establishment of monospecies or multispecies<br />

biofilms [Rickard et al. 2003]. The gram-positive species Staphylococcus<br />

epidermidis, S. aureus and Enterococcus faecalis represent more<br />

than 50% of the species isolated from device-associated infections. Candida<br />

spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a few other gram-negative species<br />

represent the remaining causative agents.<br />

The incidence of device-related infections is dramatically increasing, its<br />

relevance being particularly due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality<br />

directly associated with these infections. The Centers for Disease Control and<br />

Prevention has estimated that approximately 80,000 central venous catheterassociated<br />

bloodstream infections occur in intensive care units in the United<br />

States each year [O’Grady et al. 2002]. The treatment of these infections<br />

involves prolonged hospital stays and increased medical costs.<br />

Since the early 1980’s, a number of strategies have been developed to prevent<br />

device-related infections. Most of these are based on the use of antiadhesive,<br />

antiseptic and antibiotic coatings of catheters [Donelli, Francolini 2001;<br />

Kaplan 2005]. However, results obtained so far did not reach enough clinical<br />

relevance to consider these medicated catheters as definitive substitutes for<br />

conventional ones. For these reasons, further research efforts are still needed<br />

to design novel medical devices refractory to microbial colonization and<br />

biofilm formation.<br />

796 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!