Il ruolo dell'ecografia nella gestione delle uropatie malformative - Fimp

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mild renal pelvis dilatation The h association bbetween riskk off positive ddiagnosis andd mild ld renall pelvis l dl dilatation in the h neonatall period and at one month of age has been evaluated by mean of a logistic regression model (Ors and 95% CI), taking as a reference the value: < 4 mm. Cases Odds ratio (95% CI) P_value NNeonatal lperiod i d < 4 mm 4-5 mm 6-7 mm 8-10 mm One month of age g < 4 mm 4-5 mm 6-7 mm 8 10 Ref 2,54 ( 0,70 – 9,21 ) 2,04 ( 0,59 – 7,08 ) 8,67 ( 2,56 – 29,37) Ref 0,71 ( 0,14 – 3,61 ) 1,17 ( 0,26 – 5,19 ) 456 (113 18 45 0,15 026 0,26 0,001 0,68 0,84 003 8-10 mm 4,56 ( 1,13 – 18,45 ) 0,03 Comment CCComment tt : : a a statistically statistically tt ti ti ti ti ll ll significant significant ii ifi ifi tt risk risk ii kk for for ff renal renal ll pathology pathology th th ll was was found found ff dd for for ff 88-- 88 10 10 mm mm renal renal pelvis pelvis dilatation dilatation at at birth birth (OR=8.67 (OR=8.67 CI:2.56 CI:2.56--29.37; 29.37; p=0.001) p=0.001) and and at at first first month month of of life life (OR=4.56 (OR=4.56 95% 95% CI:1.13 CI:1.13--18.45; 18.45; p=0.03) p=0.03)
Mild renal pelvis dilatation: vesico vesico-ureteric ureteric reflux reflux (n=40) (n=40) Low Low degree degree VUR (I (I-II): (I II): II): 8/40 8/40 Moderate degree VUR (III): 11/40 Severe degree VUR (IV-V): (IV V): 21/40
Page 1 and 2: L’ECOGRAFIA L ECOGRAFIA (E L’EC
Page 3 and 4: Anni di attività dei Colleghi 20>
Page 5 and 6: Numero ecografie richieste/anno 45
Page 7 and 8: Evidenze Evidenze del del questiona
Page 9 and 10: Antenatally diagnosed mild isolated
Page 11 and 12: Mild, isolated, renal pelvis dilata
Page 13: Mild renal pelvis dilatation: urina
Page 17 and 18: Primary VUR / obstructive forms AP
Page 19 and 20: RPD (mm) in PUJS according to surgi
Page 21 and 22: ANTERO-POSTERIOR RENAL PELVIS DIAME
Page 24 and 25: CAKUT ((CCongenital ongenital AAnom
Page 26 and 27: Nakanishi Nakanishi and and Yoshika
Page 28 and 29: Anomalie A AAnomalie li di di sede
Page 31 and 32: Anomalie di sede (3) Ptosi renale
Page 33 and 34: US FETALE
Page 36 and 37: Stenosi Stenosi giunto giunto pielo
Page 40 and 41: Stenosi Ste Stenosi os giunzione g
Page 44: Reflusso vescico vescico-ureterale
Page 48: setto mesorenale incompleto setto t
Page 54: Sbocco ectopico uretere/ureterocele
Page 57 and 58: Anomalie A AAnomalie li vescicali/u
Page 59 and 60: Anomalie A AAnomalie li vescicali/u
Page 62 and 63: Renal outcome in patients with cong
Page 64 and 65:
Dilatazione delle vie urinarie: ele
Page 66 and 67:
PL, maschio, nato il 15/6/2011. Ris
Page 68 and 69:
RM: non dimostrabile lo sbocco uret
Page 70 and 71:
Non inferiorità assoluta dell’ec
show all

Il ruolo dell'ecografia nella gestione delle uropatie malformative - Fimp

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?