16.06.2013 Views

FOGLI DI LAVORO per il Diritto internazionale 3 ... - Giurisprudenza

FOGLI DI LAVORO per il Diritto internazionale 3 ... - Giurisprudenza

FOGLI DI LAVORO per il Diritto internazionale 3 ... - Giurisprudenza

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

208<br />

<strong>FOGLI</strong> <strong>DI</strong> <strong>LAVORO</strong> <strong>per</strong> <strong>il</strong> <strong>Diritto</strong> <strong>internazionale</strong> 3/2008<br />

expenses claimed for the proceedings before the domestic courts<br />

were incurred by them in order to seek prevention or<br />

rectification of the specific violation caused by the excessive<br />

length of the proceedings. However, seeing that in length-ofproceedings<br />

cases the protracted examination of a case beyond a<br />

“reasonable time” involves an increase in the applicant's costs<br />

(see, among other authorities, Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no.<br />

75529/01, § 148, ECHR 2006), it does not find it unreasonable<br />

to make to the applicant associations, who were jointly<br />

represented by counsel, a joint award of EUR 1,500 under this<br />

head. With regard to the costs incurred in the proceedings before<br />

it, the Court, deciding in equity, jointly awards EUR 2,500.<br />

C. Default interest<br />

113. The Court considers it appropriate that the default<br />

interest should be based on the marginal lending rate of the<br />

European Central Bank, to which should be added three<br />

<strong>per</strong>centage points.<br />

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT<br />

1. Decides unanimously to strike out the application in so far as<br />

it concerns the complaints of the fourth and fifth applicant<br />

associations (Dharmadeep Verein für ganzheitliches Leben<br />

e.V. and Osho Meditations Center Berlin e.V);<br />

2. Declares unanimously the remainder of the application<br />

admissible;<br />

3. Holds unanimously that there has been a violation of Article<br />

6 § 1 of the Convention;<br />

4. Holds by five votes to two that there has been no violation of<br />

Article 9 of the Convention;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!