Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Press</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> <strong>WSF</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />
always said that that kind of academic posture will eventually dissipate the spirit of the <strong>WSF</strong>, and I think that<br />
has already happened to some extent.<br />
To really reinforce its soul and continue to provide a strong kind of energy in support of civil society movements,<br />
the Palestine issue, and Afghanistan, the issue of capitalism really - these are issues in which the <strong>WSF</strong> must<br />
take a very strong stand.<br />
IPS: Such an approach demands a permanent structure.<br />
WB: Yes, I think that we should find ways of really making the International Council a more accountable body.<br />
The problem now with the IC is that it is mainly a discussion group rather than a body with real effective powers<br />
to move the struggle on.<br />
IPS: Should the IC be an elected body?<br />
WB: We can’t be tied to forms, but we really need an International Council that is accountable, that is<br />
representative, so to speak. There are various kinds of formal mechanisms. I feel also that we should probably<br />
have a more effective kind of Secretariat that is there not organising the next forum but to ensure the<br />
implementation of resolutions and the accumulation of lessons.<br />
One of the problems of the <strong>WSF</strong> has been that there is no sense of accumulation of lessons from one <strong>WSF</strong> to<br />
another, so accountability, accumulation of lessons and decision-making that is democratic - this is the<br />
challenge of the <strong>WSF</strong>. Having said that, despite all the unnevenness and weaknesses of the <strong>WSF</strong>, it is still a<br />
very important mechanism for global civil society to be able to influence the course of global events.<br />
(*This report was published by TerraViva, an independent IPS daily, at the World Social Forum in Belem,<br />
Brazil.) (END/<strong>2009</strong>)<br />
Q&A: 'We Have to be Good at Proposing, Not Just Opposing'<br />
Miren Gutierrez interviews AYE AYE WIN of Dignity International<br />
ROME, Jan 26 (IPS) - NGOs like Dignity International are packing their bags<br />
to fly to Belem in Brazil where the World Social Forum (<strong>WSF</strong>) is taking place<br />
this year. The stakes are high.<br />
"We are all gathering in Belem because we still firmly believe that another world is<br />
possible," says Aye Aye Win, executive director of Dignity International, a<br />
Netherlands-based organisation supporting people and groups engaged in fighting<br />
for human rights. "I do believe that the current global economic crisis in many ways<br />
confirms the importance of the <strong>WSF</strong> as a forum that proposes viable alternatives,<br />
and it would be wise for the World Economic Forum at Davos (Switzerland) to lend<br />
its ears to ideas coming out of it."<br />
Aye Aye has worked for the Council of <strong>Europe</strong>, an organisation that seeks to develop common principles based<br />
on the <strong>Europe</strong>an Convention on Human Rights. She has coordinated the Global Forum for Poverty Eradication,<br />
from which Dignity International originated. She has worked also for the Advocacy and Early Warning<br />
Department of the London-based NGO International Alert, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation in Japan, and the<br />
Development Centre of the Organisation For Economic Cooperation And Development (OECD, a grouping of 30<br />
wealthy nations).<br />
Aye Aye Win spoke with the IPS Editor-in-Chief about the role of the <strong>WSF</strong> today.<br />
IPS: The <strong>WSF</strong> is a movement against the "kind of globalisation which is based only on the values of<br />
market and profit," in the words of <strong>WSF</strong> international committee member Roberto Savio. Do you feel<br />
10