HEARTLINE HSM Genoa Cardiology Meeting - Aristea

HEARTLINE HSM Genoa Cardiology Meeting - Aristea HEARTLINE HSM Genoa Cardiology Meeting - Aristea

01.06.2013 Views

92 Raccolta dati Dati da Raccogliere a cura del 118 Di seguito vengono indicati alcuni dati temporali del servizio 118 che devono essere raccolti per poter eseguire il monitoraggio del progetto: • data e ora di insorgenza dei sintomi • data e ora chiamata al 118 • data e ora ecg • data e ora arrivo in Ps o emodinamica Sono da denire i tempi dalla porta del PS / emodinamica in poi Dati da raccogliere a cura dei DEA, PS: Dati anagraci (DOB, Sesso, Codice scale, altezza e peso) Fattori di rischio CV Eventi CV pregressi (infarto miocardico, ictus, CABG, scompenso cardiaco) Percorsi (118, autopresentazione PS Spoke, PS Hub, già in ospedale) Dati da raccogliere a cura dei Servizi di Emodinamica: Data e ora inizio sintomi, tipo sintomo, 1° contatto medico, 1° ecg diagnostico, porta primo ospedale, porta ospedale denitivo, inizio brinolisi, ingresso in emodinamica, coronarograa, gonaggio palloncino. Sede infarto, numero derivazioni ST elevato, recidiva eterosede, PA, FC, Classe Killip alla presentazione, arresto cardiaco. Terapia antiaggregante, tipo di terapia riperfusiva Estensione malattia coronarica, vaso colpevole, usso TIMI basale e nale, tecnica PTCA Eventi intraospedalieri, data dimissione Picco Tn - CKMB, FE alla dimissione, creatinina all’ingresso e di picco, Hb all’ingresso e nadir Eventi nel follow-up Bibliograa ESC/EACTS Guidelines European Heart Journal (2010) 1, 2 01–2 doi:10.109 /eurheartj/ehq277 -Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1 1–1 81. -Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, et al. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. Circulation 1997; 9 :20 7–20 . -Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008;117:128 –1291. -Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignicant stenosis: -year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 9:210 –2111. Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, et al. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 9:11 1–11 8. -Beanlands RS, Nichol G, Huszti E, et all. F-18- luorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging-assisted management of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease: a randomized, controlled trial (PARR-2). J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 0:2002–2012. -Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, et ll. Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-STsegment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; :2 –2 . -Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1 98–1660.

Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. In-hospital revascularization and one-year outcome of acute coronary syndrome patients stratied by the GRACE risk score. Am J Cardiol 200 ;96:91 –916. -Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, et al. -year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet 2006; 68:998–100 . -Damman P, Hirsch A, Windhausen F et al,. -year clinicaloutcomes in the ICTUS (Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstablecoronary Syndromes) trial a randomized comparison of an early invasive versus selective invasive management in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; :8 8–86 . -Fox KA, Poole-Wilson P, Clayton TC, et al. -year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA randomised trial. Lancet 200 ; 66:91 –920. -Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C, et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptibatide in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 60: 2176–2190. -Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 60:216 –217 . -Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 2 randomised trials. Lancet 200 ; 61:1 –20. -Kalla K, Christ G, Karnik R, et al. Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry).Circulation 2006;11 :2 98–2 0 . -Zahn R, Schiele R, Schneider S, et al. Decreasing hospital mortality between 199 and 1998 in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty but not in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 6:206 –2071. -Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 200 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006;11 :e166–e286. -Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, et al. Routine early angioplasty after brinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2009; 60:270 –2718. -Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, et al. Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet 2008; 71: 9– 68. -Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, et al. Routine invasive strategy within 2 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemiaguided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 200 ; 6 :10 –10 . -Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 200 ; :27 8–2768. -Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F, et al.Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital brinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a -year follow-up. Eur Heart J 2009; 0:1 98–1606. -Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 0 countries. Eur Heart J 2010; 1:9 –9 7. -Boersma E. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital brinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 2006;27:779–788. -Nallamothu B, Fox KA, Kennelly BM, et al. Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing brinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart 2007;9 :1 2–1 . -Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, et al. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2008; 8:220 –2217. -Wijeysundera HC, Vijayaraghavan R, Nallamothu BK, et al. Rescue angioplasty or repeat brinolysis after failed brinolytic therapy for ST-segment myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 9: 22– 0. -Busk M, Kaltoft A, Nielsen SS, et al. Infarct size and myocardial salvage after primary angioplasty in patients presenting with symptoms for ,12 h vs. 12–72 h. Eur Heart J 2009; 0:1 22–1 0. -Schomig A, Mehilli J,Antoniucci D, Ndrepepa G,. Mechanical ESC/EACTS Guidelines 2 9reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 200 ;29 :286 –2872. -Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006; :2 9 –2 07. -Steg PG, Thuaire C, Himbert D, et al. DECOPI (DEsobstruction COronaire en Post-Infarctus): a randomized multi-centre trial of occluded artery angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 200 ;2 :2187–219 . -Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;1 : 0 – 11. -Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITONTIMI 8): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 7 :72 –7 1. -Cannon CP, Harrington RA, James S, et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomized double-blind study. Lancet 2010; 7 :28 –29 . -Huber K, Holmes DR Jr, van ’t Hof AW, et al. Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the APEX-AMI trial. Eur Heart J 2010; 1;1708–1716. 9

Yan AT, Yan RT, Tan M, et al. In-hospital revascularization and one-year outcome of acute coronary syndrome patients stratied<br />

by the GRACE risk score. Am J Cardiol 200 ;96:91 –916.<br />

-Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, et al. -year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive<br />

strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study. Lancet 2006; 68:998–100 .<br />

-Damman P, Hirsch A, Windhausen F et al,. -year clinicaloutcomes in the ICTUS (Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in<br />

Unstablecoronary Syndromes) trial a randomized comparison of an early invasive versus selective invasive management in patients<br />

with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; :8 8–86 .<br />

-Fox KA, Poole-Wilson P, Clayton TC, et al. -year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary<br />

syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA randomised trial. Lancet 200 ; 66:91 –920.<br />

-Giugliano RP, White JA, Bode C, et al. Early versus delayed, provisional eptibatide in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med<br />

2009; 60: 2176–2190.<br />

-Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med<br />

2009; 60:216 –217 .<br />

-Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a<br />

quantitative review of 2 randomised trials. Lancet 200 ; 61:1 –20.<br />

-Kalla K, Christ G, Karnik R, et al. Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: Viennese registry on reperfusion<br />

strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry).Circulation 2006;11 :2 98–2 0 .<br />

-Zahn R, Schiele R, Schneider S, et al. Decreasing hospital mortality between 199 and 1998 in patients with acute myocardial<br />

infarction treated with primary angioplasty but not in patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Results from the pooled<br />

data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (MITRA) Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Registry (MIR).<br />

J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 6:206 –2071.<br />

-Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 200 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a<br />

report of the American College of <strong>Cardiology</strong>/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing<br />

Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006;11 :e166–e286.<br />

-Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, et al. Routine early angioplasty after brinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J<br />

Med 2009; 60:270 –2718.<br />

-Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, et al. Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis<br />

in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective,<br />

randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet 2008; 71: 9– 68.<br />

-Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A, et al. Routine invasive strategy within 2 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemiaguided<br />

conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial.<br />

Lancet 200 ; 6 :10 –10 .<br />

-Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial<br />

infarction. N Engl J Med 200 ; :27 8–2768.<br />

-Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F, et al.Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital brinolysis in acute myocardial infarction<br />

(CAPTIM) trial: a -year follow-up. Eur Heart J 2009; 0:1 98–1606.<br />

-Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of<br />

the current situation in 0 countries. Eur Heart J 2010; 1:9 –9 7.<br />

-Boersma E. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary<br />

intervention and in-hospital brinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 2006;27:779–788.<br />

-Nallamothu B, Fox KA, Kennelly BM, et al. Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing brinolysis and<br />

primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.<br />

Heart 2007;9 :1 2–1 .<br />

-Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, et al. Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med<br />

2008; 8:220 –2217.<br />

-Wijeysundera HC, Vijayaraghavan R, Nallamothu BK, et al. Rescue angioplasty or repeat brinolysis after failed brinolytic therapy<br />

for ST-segment myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 9: 22– 0.<br />

-Busk M, Kaltoft A, Nielsen SS, et al. Infarct size and myocardial salvage after primary angioplasty in patients presenting with<br />

symptoms for ,12 h vs. 12–72 h. Eur Heart J 2009; 0:1 22–1 0.<br />

-Schomig A, Mehilli J,Antoniucci D, Ndrepepa G,. Mechanical ESC/EACTS Guidelines 2 9reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial<br />

infarction presenting more than 12 hours from symptom onset: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 200 ;29 :286 –2872.<br />

-Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med<br />

2006; :2 9 –2 07.<br />

-Steg PG, Thuaire C, Himbert D, et al. DECOPI (DEsobstruction COronaire en Post-Infarctus): a randomized multi-centre trial of<br />

occluded artery angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 200 ;2 :2187–219 .<br />

-Weiss ES, Chang DD, Joyce DL, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of<br />

California discharge data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;1 : 0 – 11.<br />

-Montalescot G, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, et al. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary<br />

intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITONTIMI 8): double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet<br />

2009; 7 :72 –7 1.<br />

-Cannon CP, Harrington RA, James S, et al. Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy<br />

for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomized double-blind study. Lancet 2010; 7 :28 –29 .<br />

-Huber K, Holmes DR Jr, van ’t Hof AW, et al. Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention:<br />

insights from the APEX-AMI trial. Eur Heart J 2010; 1;1708–1716.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!