31.05.2013 Views

atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...

atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...

atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Atti <strong>delle</strong> Giornate <strong>di</strong> Coniglicoltura AsIC <strong>2011</strong> – 8-9 aprile <strong>2011</strong> – Forlì – Italia<br />

once rabbits are fed freely again, their circa<strong>di</strong>an eating and drinking activity was<br />

higher compared to control animals (number of meals = 48 for r vs.. 38 for aL; total<br />

meal duration = 4h17min vs.. 2h32min for aL; number of drinks = 40 for r vs.. 36<br />

for aL), and it re-adapt very quickly (within two or three days) to a “classical” fee<strong>di</strong>ng<br />

behaviour, balanced along 24 hours (martignon, 2010).<br />

Face to these abrupt changes in fee<strong>di</strong>ng behaviour, the faecal excretion pattern, inclu<strong>di</strong>ng<br />

caecotrophy is deeply mo<strong>di</strong>fied, as shown in figure 6. For restricted rabbits,<br />

the faecal excretion peak occurred between 5 to 8 hours after the feed supply, thus<br />

about three to four hours later than the eating peak. accor<strong>di</strong>ngly, the caecotrophy period<br />

is moved and is located about 8 to 10 h after the feed <strong>di</strong>stribution, as already observed<br />

by Fioramonti and ruckebusch (1974) on adult rabbits fed one time a day. in<br />

return, the ratio soft to hard faces seemed not mo<strong>di</strong>fied (martignon, 2010).<br />

since for restricted rabbits the competi tion to access the feeder is high during the<br />

first hour after the feed <strong>di</strong>stribution, we expect some hostile even aggressive behaviour.<br />

in fact, martignon (2010) <strong>di</strong>d not observe any increase of aggres siveness<br />

and no more lesions for r rabbits. in consequence, applying a short-term restriction<br />

strategy will not completely follow one<br />

% of the total quantity of dry feces<br />

16<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

2 h<br />

4 h<br />

Ad libitum<br />

Restricted<br />

dark period<br />

light period<br />

6 h<br />

8 h<br />

10 h<br />

12 h<br />

feed<br />

<strong>di</strong>stribution<br />

14 h<br />

16 h<br />

18 h<br />

20 h<br />

22 h<br />

24 h<br />

2 h<br />

Figure 6 – Fecal excretion pattern (47 d old), accor<strong>di</strong>ng<br />

to the intake level: ad libitum vs. restricted (75%<br />

of AL) after weaning at 28 d.<br />

the 5 rules of the Farm animal Welfare<br />

Council (http://www.fawc.org.uk/<br />

freedoms.htm): Freedom from hunger<br />

and Thirst. however, considering a 24h<br />

period, the rabbit expressed a transitory<br />

hunger (and not thirst, except for a<br />

strategy limiting the access to drinker)<br />

and its growth is not greatly impaired<br />

for a moderate restriction (under 70%<br />

of aL). in return, a limited intake strategy<br />

will support the third rule “Freedom<br />

from Pain, injury or <strong>di</strong>sease”,<br />

since many stu<strong>di</strong>es report an improvement<br />

in <strong>di</strong>gestive health of the young<br />

rabbit (see following section).<br />

<strong>di</strong>gestive health of the growing rabbit accor<strong>di</strong>ng<br />

to the intake level after weaning.<br />

Preliminary to review this point, a brief recall about the method to estimate health<br />

status of a group of animals is pertinent respect to the growing rabbit <strong>di</strong>gestive health.<br />

a common in<strong>di</strong>cator to evaluate the impact of a <strong>di</strong>sease in bree<strong>di</strong>ng is the mortality<br />

rate. more recently, morbi<strong>di</strong>ty in<strong>di</strong>cator was developed for the growing rabbit to assess<br />

more precisely the incidence of the clinical symptoms (Gidenne et al., 2010),<br />

and it could be combined with mortality to obtain the health risk index (“hri”= morbi<strong>di</strong>ty<br />

+ mortality rate). This approach allows a more precise assessment of the health<br />

status. Thus it means that a large number of animals are required to detect a significant<br />

<strong>di</strong>fference between two treatments in mortality. For instance, to detect a 10% deviation<br />

among two mortality rates (at a risk level of 5%), more than about 90 rabbits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!