atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...
atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...
atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Atti <strong>delle</strong> Giornate <strong>di</strong> Coniglicoltura AsIC <strong>2011</strong> – 8-9 aprile <strong>2011</strong> – Forlì – Italia<br />
once rabbits are fed freely again, their circa<strong>di</strong>an eating and drinking activity was<br />
higher compared to control animals (number of meals = 48 for r vs.. 38 for aL; total<br />
meal duration = 4h17min vs.. 2h32min for aL; number of drinks = 40 for r vs.. 36<br />
for aL), and it re-adapt very quickly (within two or three days) to a “classical” fee<strong>di</strong>ng<br />
behaviour, balanced along 24 hours (martignon, 2010).<br />
Face to these abrupt changes in fee<strong>di</strong>ng behaviour, the faecal excretion pattern, inclu<strong>di</strong>ng<br />
caecotrophy is deeply mo<strong>di</strong>fied, as shown in figure 6. For restricted rabbits,<br />
the faecal excretion peak occurred between 5 to 8 hours after the feed supply, thus<br />
about three to four hours later than the eating peak. accor<strong>di</strong>ngly, the caecotrophy period<br />
is moved and is located about 8 to 10 h after the feed <strong>di</strong>stribution, as already observed<br />
by Fioramonti and ruckebusch (1974) on adult rabbits fed one time a day. in<br />
return, the ratio soft to hard faces seemed not mo<strong>di</strong>fied (martignon, 2010).<br />
since for restricted rabbits the competi tion to access the feeder is high during the<br />
first hour after the feed <strong>di</strong>stribution, we expect some hostile even aggressive behaviour.<br />
in fact, martignon (2010) <strong>di</strong>d not observe any increase of aggres siveness<br />
and no more lesions for r rabbits. in consequence, applying a short-term restriction<br />
strategy will not completely follow one<br />
% of the total quantity of dry feces<br />
16<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
2 h<br />
4 h<br />
Ad libitum<br />
Restricted<br />
dark period<br />
light period<br />
6 h<br />
8 h<br />
10 h<br />
12 h<br />
feed<br />
<strong>di</strong>stribution<br />
14 h<br />
16 h<br />
18 h<br />
20 h<br />
22 h<br />
24 h<br />
2 h<br />
Figure 6 – Fecal excretion pattern (47 d old), accor<strong>di</strong>ng<br />
to the intake level: ad libitum vs. restricted (75%<br />
of AL) after weaning at 28 d.<br />
the 5 rules of the Farm animal Welfare<br />
Council (http://www.fawc.org.uk/<br />
freedoms.htm): Freedom from hunger<br />
and Thirst. however, considering a 24h<br />
period, the rabbit expressed a transitory<br />
hunger (and not thirst, except for a<br />
strategy limiting the access to drinker)<br />
and its growth is not greatly impaired<br />
for a moderate restriction (under 70%<br />
of aL). in return, a limited intake strategy<br />
will support the third rule “Freedom<br />
from Pain, injury or <strong>di</strong>sease”,<br />
since many stu<strong>di</strong>es report an improvement<br />
in <strong>di</strong>gestive health of the young<br />
rabbit (see following section).<br />
<strong>di</strong>gestive health of the growing rabbit accor<strong>di</strong>ng<br />
to the intake level after weaning.<br />
Preliminary to review this point, a brief recall about the method to estimate health<br />
status of a group of animals is pertinent respect to the growing rabbit <strong>di</strong>gestive health.<br />
a common in<strong>di</strong>cator to evaluate the impact of a <strong>di</strong>sease in bree<strong>di</strong>ng is the mortality<br />
rate. more recently, morbi<strong>di</strong>ty in<strong>di</strong>cator was developed for the growing rabbit to assess<br />
more precisely the incidence of the clinical symptoms (Gidenne et al., 2010),<br />
and it could be combined with mortality to obtain the health risk index (“hri”= morbi<strong>di</strong>ty<br />
+ mortality rate). This approach allows a more precise assessment of the health<br />
status. Thus it means that a large number of animals are required to detect a significant<br />
<strong>di</strong>fference between two treatments in mortality. For instance, to detect a 10% deviation<br />
among two mortality rates (at a risk level of 5%), more than about 90 rabbits