31.05.2013 Views

atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...

atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...

atti delle giornate di coniglicoltura asic 2011 - Fondazione iniziative ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Atti <strong>delle</strong> Giornate <strong>di</strong> Coniglicoltura AsIC <strong>2011</strong> – 8-9 aprile <strong>2011</strong> – Forlì – Italia<br />

significantly to the body compensatory growth. but, the increased in <strong>di</strong>gesta content<br />

seems the major factor of increase of the full <strong>di</strong>gestive tract. accor<strong>di</strong>ngly, the dressing<br />

out (slaughter yield) is reduced by about 2 unit (Table 3), and seemed not closely<br />

dependant of the restriction strategy (duration or level of intake). in ad<strong>di</strong>tion, a minimum<br />

length for the restriction period seems necessary, since Tumova et al. (2006)<br />

<strong>di</strong>d not find any change in dressing percentage for a moderate restriction (70% of aL<br />

for 1 or 2 weeks and a re-fee<strong>di</strong>ng period of 2 weeks).<br />

Table 3 – Impact of a post weaning quantitative £ reduction of the feed intake on the<br />

slaughter yield and some carcass characteristics of the rabbit.<br />

10<br />

Intake level $<br />

Restriction<br />

// ad libitum<br />

period<br />

Full <strong>di</strong>gestive<br />

tract weight<br />

(% Lw)<br />

dressing out,<br />

%<br />

p+IS µ fat<br />

(% Lw)<br />

Reference<br />

100 r: 28*-49d 17.9 58.3 Jérome et al.,<br />

1998<br />

80 aL: 63-70d 18.9 56.9<br />

100 r: 35*-60d 70.2a 1.7a bovera et al.,<br />

2008<br />

80 aL:60-81d 67.6b 1.3b<br />

100 r: 32*-53d 57.5 2.3a Foubert et al.,<br />

2008a<br />

70 aL: 53-67d 56.6 1.6b<br />

100 r: 42-77d 20.1a 56.4a 1.9<br />

85 21.1ab 55.3b 1.7<br />

70 23.4b 54.1c 1.3<br />

100 r: 56.1a<br />

80 35*-54d 54.6b<br />

70 aL: 55.4b<br />

60 54-70d 54.8b<br />

bergaoui et al.,<br />

2008<br />

Gidenne et al.,<br />

2009a<br />

100 r: 35*-63d 16.8a 56.4a 2.3a Gidenne et al.,<br />

75 aL: 63-70d 19.8b 54.5b 1.7b 2009d<br />

£: the limitation of intake is obtained by a daily manual <strong>di</strong>stribution of a defined quantity of pellets.<br />

$: in percent of the voluntary intake (100%= ad libitum); r= restriction period; aL = ad libitum period<br />

*: age at weaning; a-c: significant <strong>di</strong>fference between aL and r, within the same study.<br />

µ: P+is= perirenal + interscapular fat<br />

a, b: significant <strong>di</strong>fference between aL and r, within the same study.<br />

reversely, after re-fee<strong>di</strong>ng freely, although the growth increase should profit more to<br />

tissues and organs having a late development (such fatty tissues, ouhayoun, 1998),<br />

at slaughter the carcass fattening level remains lower whatever the restriction strategy<br />

used: the weight of perirenal and interscapular fat is about 0.5 unit (%) lower, and<br />

seemed related negatively to the intake level (Table 3). besides, Gondret et al. (2000)<br />

showed that changes in the nutritional status (through a feed restriction) regulate intramuscular<br />

lipid deposition, without changing fibre-type composition.<br />

besides, a restriction strategy seemed not to mo<strong>di</strong>fy other carcass characteristics or<br />

meat quality, such as carcass conformation, meat colour, cooking losses, meat/bone<br />

ratio water hol<strong>di</strong>ng capacity, phu, fibre type, (Perrier, 1998; dalle Zotte et al., 2005;<br />

Tumova et al., 2006; Gidenne et al., 2009a, d).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!