Scarica il documento in formato pdf (574 KB - ANCE
Scarica il documento in formato pdf (574 KB - ANCE
Scarica il documento in formato pdf (574 KB - ANCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12<br />
Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia Pratica<br />
It J Practice Cardiol<br />
Ottobre 2003<br />
Tab. 9<br />
Thresholds and<br />
preponderance of stays<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive and<br />
postoperative lenght of stay.<br />
Tab. 10<br />
Dest<strong>in</strong>y of long stay<strong>in</strong>g<br />
patients <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care.<br />
(a = personal case history).<br />
The proportion of patients who have a prolonged<br />
course <strong>in</strong> ICU is around 5.7-10%,<br />
whereas the proportion of patients with prolonged<br />
hospital course ranges from 8% to<br />
37%. This gap is not only due to the severity<br />
of operated patients’ conditions or to the<br />
experience of <strong>in</strong>dividual surgeons. It can also<br />
be due to the cut-off used to def<strong>in</strong>e “pro-<br />
longed stay” (from 3 to 10 days <strong>in</strong> ICU and<br />
from 7 to 14 days <strong>in</strong> a postoperative course,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to s<strong>in</strong>gle studies) [Table 9].<br />
Nevertheless, the distribution of the ICU and hospital<br />
LOS and hospital is very sim<strong>il</strong>ar <strong>in</strong> different<br />
studies and is highly skewed, characterised by a<br />
shift of the mean and median to lower values<br />
and by a long ta<strong>il</strong> of less frequent values.<br />
AUTHORS INTENSIVE CARE POSTOPERATIVE CARE<br />
Threshold % of patients Threshold % of patients<br />
Mounsey (14) > 3 days 10<br />
Staat (18) > 7 days 5.7<br />
Tu (16) > 10 days 6.2<br />
Bashour (17) > 10 days 5.4<br />
P<strong>in</strong>na P<strong>in</strong>tor (18) > 5 days 6.1 > 10 days 20<br />
Lazar (19) > 7 days 37<br />
UK (13) > 10 days 22<br />
We<strong>in</strong>traub (20) > 10 days 15.2<br />
Kurky (21) > 12 days 23<br />
Lahey (22) > 13 days 10<br />
Ferraris (23) > 14 days 8<br />
Stricker (24A) >7 days 10.6<br />
Hughes M (25 A) >30 days 1.6<br />
Dest<strong>in</strong>y of patients with a<br />
prolonged ICU-LOS<br />
In some studies, patients forced <strong>in</strong>to a prolonged<br />
ICU-LOS and hospital were evaluated<br />
to determ<strong>in</strong>e their dest<strong>in</strong>y <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
mortality, quality of life and resources consumption.<br />
The survival and quality of life of patients<br />
with a prolonged hospitalisation <strong>in</strong> ICU are<br />
particularly low [Table 10].<br />
STAY THRESHOLD % of patients HOSPITAL MORTALITY IN<br />
IN INTENSIVE MORTALITY FOLLOW UP<br />
CARE % of patients % of patients<br />
Ryan (27) > 14 days 3.8 42 -<br />
Bashour (17)<br />
< 10 days<br />
> 10 days<br />
94.6<br />
5.4<br />
1.5<br />
33.1<br />
-<br />
34 at 12 months<br />
Holmes (28) > 48 h 7.2 33.3 9.3 at 12 months<br />
< 48 h 78.7 0.8<br />
P<strong>in</strong>na P<strong>in</strong>tor (18)<br />
> 48 h<br />
>5 days<br />
21.3<br />
6.1<br />
12.5<br />
36.6<br />
1.6 at 3 months<br />
25.3 at 3 months<br />
>10 days 3.3 50<br />
Stricker (24)<br />
< 7 days<br />
> 7 days<br />
89.4<br />
10.6<br />
9.8<br />
19.9<br />
≥ 30 days 40.1<br />
Hughes (25) ≥ 60 days 42.4<br />
≥90 days 44.4<br />
In Ryan’s study (26) (1997), hospital mortality<br />
is 42% for patients (3.8% of the whole popu-<br />
lation) who rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> ICU for more than 14<br />
days. In Bashour’s study (17) (2000), the ho-