B_solo_zgibanke male new_1 - Filozofska fakulteta
B_solo_zgibanke male new_1 - Filozofska fakulteta B_solo_zgibanke male new_1 - Filozofska fakulteta
Janez Orešnik UDk 811.133.1'355:81'367 University of Ljubljana* StaNDaRD FReNCH LiaiSON aND NatURaL SyNtax PReLiMiNaRy ReMaRkS Natural Syntax is a developing deductive theory, a branch of Naturalness theory. the naturalness judgements are couched in naturalness scales, which follow from the basic parameters (or “axioms”) listed at the beginning of the paper. the predictions of the theory are calculated in what are known as deductions, whose chief components are a pair of naturalness scales and the rules governing the alignment of corresponding naturalness values. Parallel and chiastic alignments are distinguished, in complementary distribution. Here almost only chiastic alignment is utilized, this being mandatory in deductions limited to unnatural environments. (Of special importance below is the word-initial vowel as a phenomenon of low naturalness in Natural Syntax.) the exemplification is taken from Standard French morphophonology. the aim is to solicit predictions about various aspects of liaison. the focus is on the interaction of liaison with various parts of speech. H aspirée is also considered. Some recent work related to Natural Syntax: Orešnik (2007 [with varja Cvetko-Orešnik]; 2007a–e; 2008). º º º Natural Syntax is a (developing) deductive linguistic theory that determines the presuppositions on the basis of which a (morpho)syntactic state of affairs can be made predictable, and thus synchronically explained. the two basic kinds of presuppositions are what are known as naturalness scales and rules of alignment among corresponding values of any two scales. every (morpho)syntactic state of affairs is represented by two comparable variants. Natural Syntax contains no generative component. i begin by listing the criteria with which Natural Syntax substantiates naturalness scales: (a) the parameter of favourable for the speaker and of favourable for the hearer. What is favourable for the speaker is more natural, the speaker being the centre of communication. this view of naturalness is commonplace in linguistics (Havers 1931: 171), under the names of tendency to economize (utilized first of all by the speaker) and tendency to be accurate (mainly in the hearer’s interest). * author's address: Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za primerjalno in splošno jezikoslovje, aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. email: janez.oresnik@sazu.si 33
- Page 1 and 2: LINGUISTICA XLVIII DEMETRIO SKUBIC
- Page 3 and 4: vSeBiNa - SOMMaiRe iL PROFeSSOR Mit
- Page 5: Silvana Orel kos a CONtRaStive-StyL
- Page 8 and 9: Nonostante gli impegni organizzativ
- Page 11 and 12: BiBLiOGRaFiJa PROF. MitJa SkUBiCa (
- Page 13 and 14: 1969 Članki/articles Pretérito si
- Page 15 and 16: 1974 Samostojne publikacije/livres
- Page 17 and 18: Recenzije, ocene, poročila/Comptes
- Page 19 and 20: elementi linguistici latini e roman
- Page 21 and 22: 1989 Samostojne publikacije/livres
- Page 23 and 24: 1992 Članki/articles Riflessi dell
- Page 25 and 26: Roberto Dapit, la slavia friulana.
- Page 27 and 28: Recenzije, ocene, poročila/Comptes
- Page 29 and 30: und Beträge zur croatischen kultur
- Page 31: krajši članki in prispevki/Contri
- Page 35 and 36: expressions available for the lowes
- Page 37 and 38: personal pronoun. in such cases, th
- Page 39 and 40: 2. the rules of parallel alignment:
- Page 41 and 42: (5) French. adverbial question word
- Page 43 and 44: 2.1. value a tends to associate wit
- Page 45 and 46: liaison with the non-finite verb an
- Page 47 and 48: OReŠNik, Janez (2007a) “Natural
- Page 49 and 50: ana zwitter vitez UDk 811.163.6'42:
- Page 51 and 52: exemple de notre corpus que dans la
- Page 53 and 54: (1) L’intensité avant les pauses
- Page 55 and 56: Contours mélodiques (Segments 1 et
- Page 57 and 58: Contours mélodiques (segments 5 et
- Page 59 and 60: Meta Lah UDk 81'42:070 Université
- Page 61 and 62: « - Mise en intrigue et unité d
- Page 63 and 64: L’histoire est simple: après bea
- Page 65 and 66: précédents, explique le comportem
- Page 67 and 68: kam es zu einem Handgemenge. (1’
- Page 69 and 70: (ex. 4), « organizatorji so se bra
- Page 71 and 72: LóPez aLONSO, Covadonga/arlette S
- Page 73 and 74: Gregor Perko UDk 821.133.1.09-31Cé
- Page 75 and 76: du temps, des circonstances et de l
- Page 77 and 78: c’est l’univers de Meudon dans
- Page 79 and 80: entraînent l’équivalence du sav
- Page 81 and 82: 4 CONCLUSiON L’analyse narratolog
Janez Orešnik UDk 811.133.1'355:81'367<br />
University of Ljubljana*<br />
StaNDaRD FReNCH LiaiSON aND NatURaL SyNtax<br />
PReLiMiNaRy ReMaRkS<br />
Natural Syntax is a developing deductive theory, a branch of Naturalness theory.<br />
the naturalness judgements are couched in naturalness scales, which follow from<br />
the basic parameters (or “axioms”) listed at the beginning of the paper. the<br />
predictions of the theory are calculated in what are known as deductions, whose<br />
chief components are a pair of naturalness scales and the rules governing the<br />
alignment of corresponding naturalness values. Parallel and chiastic alignments are<br />
distinguished, in complementary distribution. Here almost only chiastic alignment<br />
is utilized, this being mandatory in deductions limited to unnatural environments.<br />
(Of special importance below is the word-initial vowel as a phenomenon of low<br />
naturalness in Natural Syntax.)<br />
the exemplification is taken from Standard French morphophonology. the aim<br />
is to solicit predictions about various aspects of liaison. the focus is on the<br />
interaction of liaison with various parts of speech. H aspirée is also considered.<br />
Some recent work related to Natural Syntax: Orešnik (2007 [with varja<br />
Cvetko-Orešnik]; 2007a–e; 2008).<br />
º º º<br />
Natural Syntax is a (developing) deductive linguistic theory that determines the<br />
presuppositions on the basis of which a (morpho)syntactic state of affairs can be made<br />
predictable, and thus synchronically explained. the two basic kinds of presuppositions<br />
are what are known as naturalness scales and rules of alignment among corresponding<br />
values of any two scales. every (morpho)syntactic state of affairs is represented by two<br />
comparable variants. Natural Syntax contains no generative component.<br />
i begin by listing the criteria with which Natural Syntax substantiates naturalness<br />
scales:<br />
(a) the parameter of favourable for the speaker and of favourable for the hearer.<br />
What is favourable for the speaker is more natural, the speaker being the centre of<br />
communication. this view of naturalness is commonplace in linguistics (Havers<br />
1931: 171), under the names of tendency to economize (utilized first of all by the<br />
speaker) and tendency to be accurate (mainly in the hearer’s interest).<br />
* author's address: <strong>Filozofska</strong> <strong>fakulteta</strong>, Oddelek za primerjalno in splošno jezikoslovje, aškerčeva 2,<br />
1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. email: janez.oresnik@sazu.si<br />
33