Primera de cubierta.qxd - Biblioteca digital del Real Jardín Botánico ...

110 NOMENMYX
Physarum connatum Schumach., Enum. Pl. 2: 202 (1803)
Noted as doubtful by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 381
(1875), and by later authors. If validly published, it is an
earlier homonym of Ph. connatum Ditmar, 1816 [M. & A.,
1969: 339].
Physarum connexum Link, Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin Mag.
Neuesten Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 7: 42 (1815)
Link’s name has been associated with other species,
particularly Ph. leucophaeum Fr., but its identity must
remain uncertain [M. & A., 1969: 316].
“Physarum connexum Morgan”
Cited by G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 51 (1925) and
attributed to Morgan, has been copied extensively. Morgan,
J. Cincinnati Soc. Nat. Hist. 19: 20 (1896), attributes it to
Link, Ges. Nat. Freunde Berlin Mag. 7: 42 (1815) [M. & A.,
1969: 316].
Physarum contextum Spreng., Sys. Veg. 9: 20 (1827)
Cited by Berlese in Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 7: 443 (1888), as a
synonym of Trichia chrysosperma (Bull.) DC., T. favoginea
(Batsch) Pers. of the present treatment. In any case a nom.
illeg., non Ph. contextum (Pers.) Pers., 1801.
Physarum contextum var. genuinum Rostaf., Sluzowce Monogr.:
110 (1874)
Nom. inval., see ICBN, art. 24.3.
“Physarum corrugatum Link in herb.”
Cited by Rostafiński Sluzowce Monogr.: 102 (1874), as
synonym of Ph. cinereum (Batsch) Pers.; “p.p.” in index.
Not validly published [M. & A., 1969: 339].
Physarum crustiforme Speg., Anales Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat.
Buenos Aires 6: 200 (1899)
Doubtful, see G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 260
(1925). The sketches and notes are inconclusive –Farr, Fl.
Neotrop., 16: 281 (1976)–. Martin & Alexopoulos (1969),
following earlier authors, list this taxon as doubtful species
and also as synonym of Diderma effusum (Schwein.)
Morgan. The type specimen (LPS 31416) revealed only
some fragments composed of crystalline lime and suffused
with hyphae.
“Physarum curtisii Berk.”, Grevillea 2: 65 (1873)
Cited by Berlese in Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 7: 334 (1888). An
error. Berkeley referred his species to Didymium [M. & A.,
1969: 339].
“Physarum diderma Lister”
Lister, J. Bot. 29: 260 (1891), reported this species as Ph.
diderma Rostaf., and this was repeated in the later editions of
the Monogr. Mycetozoa. This does not, of course, constitute
effective publication of “Ph. diderma Lister” [M. & A.,
1969: 288].
“Physarum diderma T. Macbr.”, N. Amer. Slime-Moulds, ed. 2:
55 (1922)
Cited by G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 60 (1925), as
a synonym of Diderma testaceum (Schrad.) Pers. Macbride
wrote Ph. diderma Rostaf. [M. & A., 1969: 339].
“Physarum didymium Schumach.”, Enum. Pl. 2: 202 (1803)
Cited by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 127 (1874), as
synonym of Tilmadoche nutans (Pers.) Rostaf., “p.p.” in
index [M. & A., 1969: 340].
“Physarum difforme Link”
Cited by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 177 (1874), as
“Diss. I. p. 27.” Reference is to Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin
Mag. Neuesten Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 3: 27 (1809),
but no such combination appears there, nevertheless, the
name is cited by Berlese, Massee and the Listers, evidently
on the basis of Rostafiński’s reference, as a synonym of what
is now called Didymium difforme (Pers.) Gray [M. & A.,
1969: 340].
Physarum dudlianum T. N. Lakh. & K. G. Mukerji, Indian
Phytopathol. ? (1979)
Cited by Lakhanpal & Mukerji, Boblioth. Mycol. 78: 204
(1981), as “in press”, but no publication has been found.
“Physarum durieui Mont. in herb.”
Cited by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 125 (1874), as
synonym of Craterium aureum (Schumach.) Rostaf. Not
validly published [M. & A., 1969: 340].
“Physarum effusum Link” in herb.
Cited by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 95 (1875), as
synonym of Ph. lividum Rostaf. Not validly published, non
Ph. effusum Schwein., 1822 [M. & A., 1969: 340].
Physarum elegans Schwein., Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 4: 257
(1832)
Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 115 (1874), suggests that it
may be a Badhamia. Both Berlese and Massee recognize it
under Physarum but add nothing to the original description.
It is rejected as doubtful in the second and third editions of
the Lister monograph. The type should be studied [M. & A.,
1969: 340].
Physarum elongatum Link, Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin Mag.
Neuesten Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 7: 42 (1815)
Doubtful, see Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 381 (1875)
[M. & A., 1969: 340].
Physarum fasciculatum Jungh., Praem. Fl. Crypt. Java: 11
(1838)
The basionym of Badhamia fasciculata (Jungh.) Rostaf.,
Sluzowce Monogr. Suppl.: 2 (1876). Both cited by G. Lister,
Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 52 (1925), as doubtful synonyms
of Ph. reniforme (Massee) G. Lister [M. & A., 1969: 340].
Physarum fimetarium Schumach., Enum. Pl. 2: 205 (1803)
Name rejected by Eliasson & Lunqvist, Bot. Not. 132: 565-
566 (1979) as a nom. dub.
“Physarum flavicomum Sacc.”
Cited by Massee, Monogr. Myxogastr.: 285 (1892), as
synonym of Ph. cupripes Berk. & Ravenel. Berlese in
Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 7: 345 (1888), cites Berkeley as the
author [M. & A., 1969: 340].
Physarum flavovirens Alb. & Schwein., Consp. Fung. Lusat.: 97
(1805)
As noted by Fries, Syst. Mycol. 3: 137 (1829), this is a
“species dubie proposita,” published as an addition to Ph.
clavus Alb. & Schwein. It was regarded as doubtful by
Rostafiński, and others, including G. Lister, Monogr.
Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 260 (1925) [M. & A., 1969: 340].
“Physarum flavum Fuckel”, Jahrb. Nassauischen Vereins
Naturk. 23-24: 343 (1870) [1869].
Cited by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 99 (1874), as a
synonym of Ph. schumacheri Spreng., and copied by later