Primera de cubierta.qxd - Biblioteca digital del Real Jardín Botánico ...

102 NOMENMYX
Lamproderma tatricum Racib., Hedwigia 28: 117 (1889)
Cited by G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 156
(1925), and Kowalski, Mycologia, 62(4): 636 (1970), as
possible synonym of L. violaceum Fr. ex Rostaf. [M. &
A., 1969: 222].
Lamproderma violaceum f. nigrescens Rostaf. in Fuckel, Symb.
Mycol. Nachtr. II 27-28: 70 (1873)
May be the same as L. arcyrioides (Sommerf.) Rostaf.
Leangium physaroides Link, Ges. Naturf. Freunde Berlin Mag.
Neuesten Entdeck. Gesammten Naturk. 3: 26 (1809)
Said by author to be intermediate between Leangium and
Physarum. Not identifiable from description [M. & A., 1969:
374].
Leangium umbilicatum Rabenh., Deutschl. Krypt.-Fl. 1: 285
(1844)
Cited by Rostafiński, Sluzowce Monogr.: 183 (1874), as
synonym of Chondrioderma radiatum ( L.) Rostaf. Probably
based on Diderma umbilicatum Pers. If so, a synonym of D.
radiatum (L.) Morgan, q.v. [M. & A., 1969: 374].
Leocarpus cyanescens (Fr.) Fr., Summa Veg. Scand.: 450 (1849)
Probably based on Didymium cyanescens Fr.
Leocarpus granulatus (Schumach.) Fr., Summa Veg. Scand.:
451 (1849)
Based on Spumaria granulata Schumach., see comments
under this species [M. & A., 1969: 295].
Leocarpus melaleucus Mont., Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., sér. 4, 3: 140
(1855)
Cited incorrectly by Berlese in Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 7:
347 (1888), as “L. melaleucus Gay” and as a synonym of
Ph. sinuosum (Bull.) Weinm.[“Rostaf.”]., Ph. bivalve Pers.
of the present treatment. Cited also by Rostafiński,
Sluzowce Monogr.: 142 (1874), as a synonym of Ph.
sinuosum [M. & A., 1969: 246].
Leocarpus minutus (Schumach.) Fr., Summa Veg. Scand.: 451
(1848)
Based on Spumaria minuta Schumach., Enum. Pl. 2: 196,
1803. Cited by G. Lister, Monogr. Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 61
(1925), as doubtful synonym of Physarum conglomeratum
(Fr.) Rostaf. [M. & A., 1969: 246].
Leocarpus nitens Fr., Summa Veg. Scand.: 450 (1848)
Cited by Berlese in Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 7: 371 (1888), as
possible synonym of Chondrioderma difforme (Pers.)
Rostaf., Didymium difforme (Pers.) Gray of the present
treatment. Possibly based on Diderna nitens [M. & A., 1969:
246].
“Lepidoderma carestianum f. caesium Meyl.”
Never published [Kowalski, Mycologia, 63(3): 510 (1971)].
“Lepidoderma carestianum f. calcite-partie Meyl.”
Never published. According to Kowalski, Mycologia, 63(3):
510 (1971), is Diderma deplanatum Fr. with the lime
recrystallized.
“Lepidoderma carestianum f. discina Meyl.”
Never published [Kowalski, Mycologia, 63(3): 510
(1971)].
“Lepidoderma carestianum f. plasmodiocarpa Meyl.”
Never published [Kowalski, Mycologia, 63(3): 510
(1971)].
Lepidoderma kurtzii Berk. ex Massee, Monogr. Myxogastr.: 255
(1892)
Listed as doubtful by Massee, on basis of Berkeley’s notes,
since specimen was not found. G. Lister in second and third
editions of Lister monograph, cited it as a possible synonym
of Physarum tenerum Rex [M. & A., 1969: 407].
Lepidoderma mandshurica Skvortsov, Philipp. J. Sci. 46: 88
(1931)
The description and illustrations suggest L. chailletii Rostaf.
except that the spore size is given as 6.8-7.2 µm. If this can
be verified and proves constant, the species may be worthy
of recognition [M. & A., 1969: 407; Kowalski, Mycologia
63(3): 513 (1971)].
Lepidoderma obovatum Massee, Monogr. Myxogastr.: 254
(1892)
G. Lister in the second and third editions of the monograph,
cited Massee’s species as a doubtful synonym of Diderma
trevelyanii (Grev.) Fr. As noted by Lister, Monogr.
Mycetozoa: 107 (1894), the figures given by Massee refer to
other species [M. & A., 1969: 407]. Kowalski, Mycologia
63(3): 514 (1971) say that the figs. 45-47, strongly resemble
Lepidoderma tigrinum (Schrad.) Rostaf.
“Lepidoderma tigrinum f. brevipes Meyl.”
Never published [Kowalski, Mycologia, 63(3): 497 (1971)].
“Lepidoderma tigrinum f. longipes Meyl.”
Never published [Kowalski, Mycologia, 63(3): 497 (1971)].
Lepidodermopsis vermicularis R. Wilczek & Meyl., Bull. Soc.
Vaud. Sci. Nat. 58: 179 (1934)
According to Kowalski, Mycologia 63(3): 515 (1971) and
67(3): 492 (1975), an illegitimate taxon. The organism so
named represents a sclerotial phase of some myxomycete,
probably Lepidoderma granuliferum (W. Phillips) R. E. Fr.
“Licea alba Bong. in herb.” ex Berl. in Saccardo, Syll. Fung. 7:
338 (1888)
Cited as a synonym of Physarum lividum Rostaf. Non L.
alba Nees, 1823. Not validly published [M. & A., 1969: 52].
Licea badia Fr., Syst. Mycol. 3: 89 (1829)
Not a myxomycete. An ascomycete?, see G. Lister, Monogr.
Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 259 (1925) [M. & A., 1969: 53].
Licea berteroana Mont., Fl. Chil. 7: 20 (1852)
Not a myxomycete. An ascomycete? See Lister, Monogr.
Mycetozoa, ed. 3: 260 (1925) [M. & A., 1969: 53].
Licea bicolor Pers., Syn. Meth. Fung.: 195 (1801)
An ascomycete, Orbicula parietina (Schrad. ex Fr.) Hughes.
See Hughes, Commonw. Mycol. Inst. Misc. Publ. 42: 1-27
1951 [M. & A., 1969: 53].
Licea bicolor var. calcicola Alb. & Schwein., Consp. Fung.
Lusat.: 107 (1805)
See comments under L. bicolor Pers.
Licea bicolor var. lignatilis Alb. & Schwein., Consp. Fung.
Lusat.: 107 (1805)
See comments under L. bicolor Pers.
Licea brassica Skvortsov, Philipp. J. Sci. 46: 89 (1931)
Wall said to contain lime. A Diderma? [M. & A., 1969: 53].
Licea brunnea Preuss, Linnaea 26: 709 (1853)
Listed, with description, by Schröter, Krypt.-Fl. Schles. 3(1):
102 (1885). Not recognizable from Schröter’s description
[M. & A., 1969: 53].