05.04.2013 Views

Catalogue of Brazilian Plants - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Catalogue of Brazilian Plants - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

Catalogue of Brazilian Plants - Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Orchideae = Orchidaceae<br />

George Gardner’s <strong>Catalogue</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brazilian</strong> <strong>Plants</strong><br />

Some variations in the spelling <strong>of</strong> generic names have been highlighted by me with ‘[sic!]’<br />

where the reader should be aware <strong>of</strong> a problem; I have not bothered substituting the correct<br />

names.<br />

I have made no attempt to correct the authorship <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the names in Gardner’s list; many<br />

are quite erroneous.<br />

Gardner corrected and altered many <strong>of</strong> the entries himself and I have used a score-through<br />

method to show such changes; there are, however, other additions. These appear to be largely<br />

in Bentham’s handwriting and <strong>of</strong>ten appear as straight entries after Gardner’s. There is little<br />

difference in some <strong>of</strong> the handwriting so it is <strong>of</strong>ten very difficult to tell them apart; doubtless<br />

some have been wrongly attributed. In many instances they are against Leguminosae. I have<br />

placed all such additions in square brackets ‘[ ]’.<br />

Other problems<br />

The list does contain a number <strong>of</strong> problematical areas, not least duplicated numbering and<br />

‘add-ins’ to the numbering system. Missing numbers are present, but relatively few; some<br />

large blocks are omitted, however. Gardner renumbered only a few series; the earlier error he<br />

noted in the body <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Catalogue</strong> and then corrected all <strong>of</strong> the affected numbers.<br />

I have also noticed whilst curating material in the Compositae that there are some split<br />

numbers which are not accounted for in the <strong>Catalogue</strong>. Researchers with ‘xxxx bis’ might not<br />

be able to locate all material.<br />

References<br />

Gardner, G. (1842a). Contributions towards a Flora <strong>of</strong> Brazil, being an enumeration <strong>of</strong> a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> collections <strong>of</strong> plants, made in various parts <strong>of</strong> Brazil, from 1836 to 1841; with<br />

brief descriptions <strong>of</strong> the new genera and species. London J. Bot. 1: 158–193.<br />

Gardner, G. (1842b). List <strong>of</strong> ferns from the neighbourhood <strong>of</strong> Rio de Janeiro, collected in<br />

1836. London J. Bot. 1: 545–548.<br />

Gardner, G. (1847). Contributions towards a Flora <strong>of</strong> Brazil, being the characters <strong>of</strong> several<br />

new species <strong>of</strong> Compositae, belonging to the tribes Vernoniaceae aad [sic!]<br />

Eupatorieaceae, from the Province <strong>of</strong> Goyaz; by George Gardner, Esq., F.L.S.<br />

Superintendent <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Botanic</strong> <strong>Gardens</strong>, Ceylon. London J. Bot. 6: 417–449.<br />

Stafleu, F. A. & Cowan, R. S. (1976). In: Taxonomic Literature: A selective guide to<br />

botanical publications and collections with dates, commentaries and types. Ed. 2. Volume<br />

1: A–G. Reg. Veg. 94: 829–830 [Fielding]; 915–916 [Gardner].<br />

3 | P a g e Transcribed by D.J.N. Hind, <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Botanic</strong> <strong>Gardens</strong>, <strong>Kew</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!