Scarica gli atti - Gruppo del Colore
Scarica gli atti - Gruppo del Colore
Scarica gli atti - Gruppo del Colore
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
esolution multispectral images, and outline the methodology employed to operate<br />
it.<br />
2. ‘Narrow-band’ multispectral imaging<br />
Compared to RGB imaging, which is based on the theoretical framework of<br />
colorimetry [7] and therefore ‘synthetizes’ color stimuli from the contributions of<br />
objects, environment, and observer, multispectral imaging attempts to estimate<br />
objects’ reflectances. It is therefore unaffected by the typical problems of RGB<br />
imaging, including device-dependency [1], metamerism [7,1], and accuracy<br />
limitations of the device sensors [8,9]. In fact, despite the availability of<br />
colorimetric device-independent color spaces and international standards such as<br />
ICC profiles [10] and sRGB [11], multispectral imaging remains the only way to<br />
achieve complete independence from both the environment and observer.<br />
Motivations for the use of multispectral imaging can be found in everyday<br />
experiences like the phenomenon of metamerism, which shows that there exist<br />
different ‘physical’colors (spectra) that sometimes get the same colorimetric<br />
representation. At the same time, physics outlines that while color representations<br />
in RGB imaging and colorimetry use parameters whose ultimate physical<br />
significance is that of measuring the amount of light energy that is ‘registered’ by<br />
the sensors considered (both human and electronic), such parameters have only an<br />
indirect relationship with the fact that the objects observed are actually able to<br />
reflect light towards those sensors.<br />
The aim of multispectral imaging is then that of describing this ‘ability’ of color<br />
surfaces as mo<strong>del</strong>led by their reflectance function; as this function depends on the<br />
physical properties of the surfaces considered, it is also much more invariant than<br />
environmental conditions and observers sensitivity, and therefore more<br />
‘fundamental’.<br />
In general, the acquisition performed using a given sensor will return a value a in<br />
the form<br />
(1) = E(<br />
) R(<br />
λ)<br />
S(<br />
λ)<br />
26<br />
λ<br />
2<br />
∫<br />
a λ dλ<br />
.<br />
λ<br />
1<br />
This value integrates contributions from the energy E that reaches the physical<br />
sample observed, the color reflectance R of the sample, and the ‘sensitivity’ S of<br />
sensor. The integration with respect to the wavelength λ is performed in the range<br />
λ1 to λ2 of the sensor's sensitivity; if this range exceeds that of the visible light<br />
spectrum, then appropriate steps must be taken to cut unwanted radiation off.<br />
To obtain an estimation of the reflectance R, two different approaches are currently<br />
used in multispectral imaging [12]. On one hand, direct measures of these values<br />
can be attempted if the device’s sensors are sensitive to a very narrow wavelength