Pembangunan Jaya Ancol GA 31 Des 2020
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PT PEMBANGUNAN JAYA ANCOL Tbk
DAN ENTITAS ANAK
CATATAN ATAS LAPORAN KEUANGAN
KONSOLIDASIAN (Lanjutan)
Untuk Tahun-tahun yang Berakhir Pada Tanggal
31 Desember 2020 dan 2019
(Dalam Rupiah Penuh, Kecuali Dinyatakan Lain)
Pada tanggal 29 November 2017, KNTI dan
WALHI mengajukan upaya hukum kasasi ke
Mahmakah Agung melalui Pengadilan Tata
Usaha Negara Jakarta terhadap putusan
Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara dalam
perkara nomor 183/B/LH/2017/PT.TUN.JKT
tanggal 30 Oktober 2017 dan tercatat dengan
nomor register perkara 194 K/TUN/LH/2018.
Pada tanggal 31 Mei 2018, Mahkamah Agung
Republik Indonesia memutus perkara nomor 194
K/TUN/LH/2018 yang pada pokoknya menolak
kasasi dari KNTI dan WALHI selaku pemohon
kasasi d/h terbanding d/h penggugat dan
menguatkan keputusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata
Usaha Negara Jakarta Nomor
183/B/LH/2017/PT.TUN.JKT. tanggal 30 Oktober
2017, dan dengan diputusnya perkara Nomor
194 K/TUN/LH/2018 oleh Mahkamah Agung
Republik Indonesia, maka terhadap putusan
tersebut telah berkekuatan hukum tetap (inkracht
van gewijsde). Bahwa kemudian relaas
pemberitahuan tentang isi putusan kasasi
perkara Nomor 194 K/TUN/LH/2018 tertanggal
14 November 2018 telah dikirimkan secara resmi
oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta
kepada Perusahaan melalui kuasa hukum
Perusahaan dan diterima oleh kuasa hukum
Perusahaan pada tanggal 15 November 2018.
e. Pada tanggal 5 Juli 2017, PT Multi Renaperkasa
Abadi (“MRA”) (selaku Penggugat) mengajukan
gugatan wanprestasi ke Pengadilan Negeri
Jakarta Utara terhadap Perusahaan (selaku
Tergugat), Gubernur DKI Jakarta (selaku Turut
Tergugat I) dan Abidin Herman (selaku Turut
Tergugat II). Gugatan didasarkan pada
perjanjian nomor:005/DIR-PJA/REK/VII/5 tentang
Pengadaan Pasir Pengembangan Pantai Ancol
Area Pantai Timur dan Comb tertanggal 1 Juli
2015, berikut perjanjian – perjanjian tambahan
dan perubahannya yang terdiri dari addendum I
tertanggal 28 September 2015, addendum II
tertanggal 17 November 2015, Addendum III
tertanggal 8 Februari 2016, dan addendum IV
tertanggal 10 Mei 2016 (selanjutnya seluruhnya
bersama-sama disebut sebagai “Perjanjian”) dan
dokumen tertulis lainnya yang dibuat dan
ditandatangani oleh perusahaan (selaku pihak
yang melakukan pengadaan barang/jasa/
pekerjaan) dan MRA (selaku pihak penyedia
barang/jasa/pekerjaan). Bahwa kemudian
gugatan telah diterima oleh Pengadilan Negeri
Jakarta Utara dan tercatat dengan nomor register
perkara 332/Pdt.G/2017/PN.JKT.UTR.
PT PEMBANGUNAN JAYA ANCOL Tbk
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019
(In Full of Rupiah, Unless Otherwise Stated)
On November 29, 2017, the KNTI and WALHI
declared a cassation appeal to the Supreme
Court through the Jakarta State Administrative
Court against the decision of the State
Administrative High Court in the case
No. 183/B/LH/2017/PT.TUN.JKT dated
October 30, 2017 and registered with case
No.194K/TUN/LH/2018.
On May 31, 2018, the Supreme Court decided on
case number 194K/TUN/LH/2018 which basically
refused the cassation from the KNTI and WALHI
as the applicants for the cassation which was the
appellee, which was the plaintiff and upheld the
decision of the Jakarta State Administrative High
Court Number 183/B/LH/2017/PT.TUN.JKT.
dated October 30, 2017, and with the termination
of Case Number 194K/TUN/LH/2018 by the
Supreme Court, then the decision has permanent
legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). Whereas then
the notification relaas regarding the contents of
the case court decision of discharge Number
194K/TUN/LH/ 2018 dated 14 November 2018
has been officially sent by the Jakarta State
Administrative Court to the Company through the
Company's attorney and received by the
Company's attorney on November 15, 2018.
e. On July 5, 2017, PT Multi Renaperkasa
Abadi ("MRA") (as Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit
against the Company (as the Defendant),
the Governor of DKI Jakarta (as Defendant I)
and Abidin Herman (as Defendant of
Defendant II). The lawsuit is based on
the agreement number 005/DIR-PJA/ REK/VII/5
on the Procurement of Ancol Coastal Beach
Sands East Coast and Comb area dated July 1,
2015, along with additional agreements and
amendments consisting of addendum I dated
September 28, 2015, addendum II dated
November 17, 2015, addendum III dated
February 8, 2016 and addendum IV dated
May 10, 2016 (hereinafter referred to collectively
as the "Agreement") and other written
documents created and signed by the company
(as the party providing the procurement
of goods/services/ work) and the MRA as
the provider of goods/ services/work). That
later the lawsuit has been received by
the North Jakarta District Court and recorded
with the register number of case 332/
Pdt.G/2017/PN.JKT.UTR.
Draft
SiMay 31, 2021 114 Paraf/ Sign: