28.04.2021 Views

kaos

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Staley, despite his interest in such deadends as Lam, appears to understand this; in

1994 he wrote that the oto is “an expression of an informing current, a current which

adopts one guise after another, moving on when a particular form has outlived its

usefulness”. One can only hope that he also realises that the greatest challenge facing

the oto today is not to set up a network of Kingdoms under the control of a Supreme

and Most Holy King but simply to understand that the oto itself has outlived its

usefulness, and is hindering the expression of the 156 current by tying up occultists in

the dead 93 current.

These realisations do not seem to come easy to most Thelemites, who appear to feel

threatened by the 156 current and do not recognise it as the living transmutation of the

93 current. In practice what will probably happen is that the oto will continue as an

organisation that soaks up neophytes and binds their Wills to its forlorn agenda, but

gradually the talented individuals who are presently wasting their time in it will come

to understand the implications of the 156 current, rise above their involvement in 93,

and then either subvert the oto or simply resign to find or create formations more

conducive to the working of kaos-babalon.

Related matters

Kenneth Grant succession letter

The “Grant succession letter” was included in OTO Rituals and Sex Magick (Thame:

Mandrake Press, 1999), edited by Tony Naylor with an introduction by Peter Koenig,

which is curious given that Ben Fernee gave a copy of the forensic handwriting analysis

he commissioned to Naylor before publication. He also gave a copy to Michael Staley

before publication in Starfire. Neither mentioned it. One suspicious thing about the

actual content of the letter is that in it “Crowley” says that Frater Saturnus (Karl Germer)

is “capable only of the Office of Custodian” of the oto, which is something that Michael

Staley had written about at length prior to the letter turning up and is indeed the

lynchpin of Grant’s claim that Germer had no legitimate authority to expel him. I am

told, however, that Staley was genuinely surprised when the “succession letter” turned

up on the Internet. Even so, the content of the letter does seem too pat with current

circumstances to have been written in 1947.

One theory is that the letter is a forgery that was not so much aimed at establishing

Grant as oho of the oto but rather at pissing off Bill Breeze. Herr Koenig is known for

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!