28.04.2021 Views

kaos

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HH: Holy shit, that is one of the best things I have ever seen you type up, vague because

of the nature of it, but informing… damn… that’s deep… I mean really.

David Cantu: Thanks Joel, this makes sense. I guess you would have brought pattern in

if you had meant to, so slap me for mentioning it.

Joel Biroco: Juxtapositional magick is my own formulation derived from many different

systems of magick over many years, and certainly the Chinese concept of li or “pattern”

feeds into that, but to mention such advanced concepts to a self-proclaimed beginner

would be out of place, so I simply provided a sketch to get him going. A brief description

couldn’t possibly exhaust juxtapositional magick.

David Cantu: Please correct what you see wrong in this view, but the rearrangement of

knowledge into symbolic systems like the Tree of Life lead magicians to see juxtapositions

between elements in new ways. I know that this isn’t what you mean in the present

practice, but it could go to the heart of why such symbolically connective systems work.

Any comments on that Joel?

Joel Biroco: Yes, and the art of “correspondences” is also equally as important in bagua,

but although these methods do certainly relate to what I refer to as juxtapositional

magick what I am really talking about here is something far more “second-nature” and

tuned-in, real moving with spontaneity without thought. Study of trigram and qabalistic

correspondences can lead to this, but in itself it lacks the sheer elegance of true

juxtapositional magick, which operates in the sense of wuwei (“not doing”, doing nothing,

no effort, no purposeful action). I am talking about something far more direct than

going via a symbolic filter of correspondences or resonances, or any kind of symbolic

framework. In this sense, by juxtapositional magick I really mean pure magick.

Mika Kaplan: It seems like using a symbolic filter of correspondences would be a good

“first step” then. One approach to the qabala (and I think Crowley discusses this

somewhere…?) is that you relate everything to the Tree of Life, everything, from the

grocery bill to the color car in front of you at the stop light, to the snippet of conversation

you hear passing people in the street, etc… to the point that the connections become

subconscious. Or maybe the correct word is unconscious. The need for the symbolic

framework disappears and there is no effort involved in seeing, knowing, understanding

how it all comes together.

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!