28.04.2021 Views

kaos

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

from the idea of silence imposed by initiation into religious rites. In my experience the

true understanding of the mystery of Babalon comes essentially from occult initiation

(on “the prayer mats of the flesh” you might say, to borrow the title of the Chinese

erotic novel by Li Yu).

Just as “Babylon the Great” is generally regarded by Biblical commentators as Rome,

so is the beast with seven heads and ten horns—Rome stood on seven hills and the

Roman empire was divided into ten provinces by Augustus Caesar. But I’m not convinced

that this “reasonable” way to look at it is the only or the best way. How does seeing the

beast as Rome help, because, following this line of reasoning, so is the Great Red Dragon,

who Michael fights as Satan. Why should the beast that rose up out of the sea and

Babalon’s beast be identified as Rome but the Great Red Dragon be regarded as Satan?

More importantly—and this is a question left unaddressed by those who seek to “explain”

Revelation—if the text is properly understood as a carefully constructed allegory does

this not undermine its status as genuine visionary experience, as a “revelation” from

God?

The idea of the seven-headed serpent or dragon is much earlier than the Bible, it

appears to have emerged from Babylonia—where it is mentioned in Old Babylonian

lists and omens—from even earlier precedents. The seven-headed serpent is mentioned

in the epic Andimdimma where it is compared with the weapon of the god Ninurta (see

Landsberger, Die Fauna des alten Mesopotamien [Leipzig, 1934], p 60). A seven-headed

serpent is also found on a Sumerian macehead; a seal dating back to the middle of the

third millennium bc from Tell Asmar (ancient Eshnunna), 50 miles northeast of modern

Baghdad, shows the slaying of a dragon with seven heads (both are illustrated in

Alexander Heidel’s The Babylonian Genesis [1951], figures 15 and 16). In Psalms 74:14

“the heads of Leviathan” are mentioned, and Isaiah 27:1 has a reference to Leviathan

that strongly parallels a reference to the seven-headed dragon or serpent Lotan from

Ugaritic mythology mentioned on a tablet from Ras Shamra. Lotan was slain by Baal.

In Isaiah 27:1 it is written, in Heidel’s translation:

“On that day the Lord will punish

With his sword, which is hard and great and strong,

Leviathan, the fleeing serpent,

And Leviathan, the tortuous serpent,

And he will slay the crocodile (tannin) that is in the sea.”

[Heidel, The Babylonian Genesis, p 103]

The King James version has “dragon (tannin) that is in the sea” but Heidel sees it as a

crocodile in the Nile (the Nile is referred to as “the Sea” in Isa. 19:5 and Nah. 3:8 and is

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!