28.12.2013 Views

értekezés - Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem

értekezés - Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem

értekezés - Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is indifferent between h = 0 and h = 1. If Firm 2 chooses h = 0:434, then Firm 1 is<br />

indifferent between h = 0 and h = 1.<br />

11. függelék - A Mello és Ruckes [2004] modell<br />

Mello and Ruckes [2004] consider two firms that produce and sell a homogenous product<br />

in two countries (with two different currencies) for two periods, having their costs and<br />

revenues split equally in each country. Each firm decides how much it wants to produce,<br />

its external financing needed to fund production 186 , and also to what extent it hedges the<br />

exchange rate risk posed by its operations. The firms can hedge by choosing the currency<br />

denomination of their debts. 187 Full hedge is assumed when the firm funds itself 50-50% in<br />

each currency. 188 A firm is supposed to be completely unhedged if it borrows all its<br />

external funds in one of the operating currencies. Firms’ operating revenues are<br />

represented by a Cournot-type function, with linear demand and linear cost. Both<br />

producers employ the same production technology.<br />

While Adam et al. [2004] explain the strategic effect of hedging policy with the production<br />

flexibility present for firms if there is uncertainty in production costs or output price, Mello<br />

and Ruckes [2004] dress this effect in a different clothing. Namely, they define the value<br />

of firm i’s equity at the end of period 2 by:<br />

w<br />

= w<br />

+ g<br />

( w ) + f ( w − w )<br />

i2 i1<br />

i1<br />

i1<br />

j1<br />

w<br />

i1<br />

represents the firm’s internal equity at the end of period 1, containing the profit from<br />

selling its products in period 1 and the mark-to-market value of the debt outstanding (the<br />

hedge position) at the end of period 1. g ( w i1<br />

) captures the effect of the level of internal<br />

equity funds on firm i’s future profitability, that is, the cost function of external finance.<br />

186 This is also an extension of the model of Adam et al. [2004], who do not allow for external funding of<br />

production.<br />

187 Ignoring the differences in the accounting treatment of the hedges, hedging with currency debt is<br />

essentially equivalent to hedging with FX forward contracts or swaps. The use of currency debt to hedge<br />

exchange rate exposures is a common technique in practice and is reported in many corporate risk<br />

management surveys. See, for example, Bodnar et al. [1998].<br />

188 Firms are assumed to have half of their costs and revenues denominated in each currency.<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!