26.01.2017 Views

United Kingdom Yearbook - 1885-1899_No47_ocr

United Kingdom Yearbook - 1885-1899_No47_ocr

United Kingdom Yearbook - 1885-1899_No47_ocr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

...; .~ ..... - ...<br />

22 .IMPERIAL REVENUE, EXP~NDITURE, "&c:·<br />

..<br />

No. 9.-=-AMOUNT of IMPERIAL. TAXI!."S<br />

Y!!.14J<br />

-<br />

Budget Estimate of ton<br />

to Revenue. ·<br />

Actual Loll tO Revenue. ·1<br />

ended RUll:.\LSD OR RXDUOBD. · For the Year in the Year<br />

in which<br />

Fora<br />

in which Ina.<br />

Slllt March.<br />

the change<br />

complete<br />

I thechange. complete<br />

took place.<br />

Year.<br />

tookpl&ce.<br />

Year.<br />

-<br />

I<br />

£. £, £, £ '<br />

1898 Nil .,. - - - -<br />

I<br />

'<br />

.lM<br />

I<br />

CUSTOMS:-<br />

RXDUO~:-<br />

Duty on 'l'obacoo ot~er • thai~}<br />

~<br />

Cigara •<br />

1,U0,000 1,200,000 t 756,000 1,400,000<br />

INCOME TAX::-<br />

Increase from 1001. to 1501. of'<br />

Abatement on Incomes above<br />

400l .. and not exceeding 600l.<br />

Abatement of 1201. on Incomes<br />

ioo,ooo<br />

above 500l. and not exceeding> 100,000 100,000 130,000<br />

6001. •. ~<br />

Abatement_ of 70l. on Incomes<br />

above 600l. and ·not exceeding<br />

7001 •. . .<br />

LAND TAX:-<br />

!<br />

Tu ,.mittoo "" fooo•no• not ox·~ }<br />

ceeding 160l. • , • • • .<br />

On Incomes not exceeding 4001.,<br />

*<br />

one·half of Land Tax remitted •<br />

{<br />

'<br />

97,000 97,000<br />

23,000 23,000<br />

------ ··- 1.:.<br />

TOUL 1,220,000 1,300,000 976,000 1,650,000<br />

.. ..<br />

... -··<br />

l900 Nil - -<br />

....:..<br />

- -<br />

Nm.-Thc loss to R1mentte caused· b]/. the reduction of T'!xes is in most ca11es less !h1in the gain which the<br />

reduction affo~ds to the tax,iayer, because the loss t~ Reven11e tB ,qemral/11 recouped b!f an increased conkttmption or<br />

use of thi! articlu taxed consequent ttpon the lo-wenn!J of the dttt11. llt11ce -the loss is not necessarily the mearore<br />

ofrelil!fto the ta:i;ptiyer. • .<br />

" Concession maciirsubAeqttelit to Budget,.brCorumlttee of Finance Bill. ·<br />

t The actual loss to the Revenue in the year ,in which the change took place would have been greater by<br />

610 oooz. If heavy abnonnal payments of duty had not been made in the last few days ot March, <strong>1899</strong>, in anticlpa·<br />

tion of" rise of duty (11ee note to Table No. 7, p. 12).<br />

House of Commons Parliamentary Papers Online.<br />

Copyright (c) 2006 ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!