246App<strong>en</strong>dice ILass, U. (1995). Einfluß von Sprache auf Verarbeitungsprozesse im Kurzzeitgedächtnis . Unveröff<strong>en</strong>tlichte Habilitationsschrift,Universität Götting<strong>en</strong>.Levin, J.A. (1976). Proteus : An activation framework for cognitive process models (Tech. rep. No. ISI/WP 2).Marina del Rey : University of Southern California, Information Sci<strong>en</strong>ces Institute.MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and s<strong>en</strong>t<strong>en</strong>ce interpretation in English, German, andItalian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 23 , 127-150.Marcus, G.F, Brinkmann, U., Clahs<strong>en</strong>, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection : The exception thatproves the rule. Cognitive Psychology , 29 , 189-256.Marsl<strong>en</strong>-Wilson, W.D. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access <strong>du</strong>ring word recognition incontinuous speech. Cognitive Psychology , 10 , 29-63.Massaro, D. W., & Coh<strong>en</strong>, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influ<strong>en</strong>ces in reading.Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 20 , 1107-1128.Massaro, D. W., & Cowan, N. (1993). Information processing models : Microscopes of the mind. Annual Reviewof Psychology , 44 , 383-425.Massaro, D. W., & Friedman, D. (1990). Models of integration giv<strong>en</strong> multiple sources of information. Psych o -logical Review , 97 , 225-252.McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Ps y chological Review , 88 , 375-407.McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1988). Parallel distributed processing : Explorations in the microstructureof cognition (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA : Bradford Books.Miller, G. A. (1993). Wörter : Streifzüge <strong>du</strong>rch die Ps y cholinguistik . Frankfurt : Zweitaus<strong>en</strong>deins.Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review , 76 , 165-178.Moser, K., Gad<strong>en</strong>ne, V., & Schröder, J. (1988). Under what conditions does confirmation seeking obstruct sci<strong>en</strong>tificprogress? Psychological Review , 95 , 572-574.Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.Norris, D.G. (1994). A quantitative model of reading aloud. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perce p -tion & Performance , 20 , 1212-1232.Paap, K., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model forletter and word recognition : The word superiority effect. Psychological Review , 89 , 573-594.Peressotti, F. & Grainger, J. (1995). Letter-Position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception & Psych o -physics, 57 , 875-890.Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Ber<strong>en</strong>t, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese : Evid<strong>en</strong>ce for a "Universal"phonological principle. In R. Frost and L. Katz (Eds.). Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Mea n -ing (pp. 227 - 248). Amsterdam : North-Holland.Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct . Harmondsworth : All<strong>en</strong> Lane.Popper, K.R. (1935). Logik der Forschung . Vi<strong>en</strong>na : Springer.Popper, K.R. (1972). Objective knowledge . Oxford : The Clar<strong>en</strong>don Press.Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York : Harper & Row.Popper, K.R. (1984). Auf der Suche nach einer besser<strong>en</strong> Welt. Münch<strong>en</strong> : Piper.Prechelt, L. (1996). A quantitative study of experim<strong>en</strong>tal evaluations of neural network learning algorithms : Curr<strong>en</strong>tresearch practice. Neural Networks , 9 , 457-462.Pugh, K. R., Rexer, K., & Katz, L. (1994). Evid<strong>en</strong>ce for flexible coding in visual word recognition. Journal of E x -perim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance , 20 , 807-825.Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). Computing in cognitive sci<strong>en</strong>ce. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive sci<strong>en</strong>ce(pp. 49-91). Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.Roberts, S., & Sternberg, S. (1993). The meaning of additive reaction-time effects : Tests of three alternatives. In :D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Att<strong>en</strong>tion & Performance XIV : Synergys in Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology,Artificial Intellig<strong>en</strong>ce, and Cognitive Neurosci<strong>en</strong>ce (pp. 611-653). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.Rosson, M. B. (1985). The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical repres<strong>en</strong>tations in reading aloud. Mem o -ry & Cognition , 13 , 90-99.Rub<strong>en</strong>stein, H., Lewis, S.S., & Rub<strong>en</strong>stein, M.A. (1971). Evid<strong>en</strong>ce for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 10, 647-657.Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Att<strong>en</strong>tion & Performance VI(pp. 573-603). Hillsdale : Erlbaum.Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part II. The contextual <strong>en</strong>hancem<strong>en</strong>t effect and some tests and ext<strong>en</strong>sions of the model. Psycholog i -cal Review , 89 , 60-94.Rouanet, H. (1996). Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin , 119 , 149-158.Sears, C.R., Hino, Y. & Lupker, S.J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequ<strong>en</strong>cy effects in word recognition.Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Ps y chology : Human Perception & Performance , 21 ,876-900.Seid<strong>en</strong>berg, M. S, Peters<strong>en</strong>, A. S., McDonald, K., & Plaut, D. C. (1996). Pseudohomophone efefcts and models ofword recognition. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition , 22 , 48-62.Shepard, R.N. (1994). Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Psychonomic Bulletin & R e -view , 1 , 2-28.Simon, H.A., & Kaplan, C.A. (1989). Foundations of cognitive sci<strong>en</strong>ce. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations ofCognitive Sci<strong>en</strong>ce (pp. 1-47). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.Spielberg, N., & Anderson, B. D. (1985). Sev<strong>en</strong> ideas that shook the universe . New York : Wiley.
App<strong>en</strong>dice I 247Stone, G. O., & Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Exper i -m<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance , 19 , 744-774.Stone, G. O., & Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C. (1994). Building a resonance framework for word recognition using <strong>des</strong>ign andsystem principles. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Perfor m ance , 20 , 1248-1268.Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C. (in press). Perception is a two-way street : Feedforward and feedbackphonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language , in press.Tack, W. H. (1976). Stochastische Lernmodelle . Berlin : Kohlhammer.Treiman, R., Mull<strong>en</strong>nix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the<strong>des</strong>cription, use, and acquisition of English orthography, Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : G<strong>en</strong>eral,124 , 107-136.Uttal, W. R. (1990). On some two-way barriers betwe<strong>en</strong> models and mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics ,48, 188-203.Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdep<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>ce of form and function in cognitive systems explainsperception of printed words. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Human Perception and Performance , 20 ,1269-1291.Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word id<strong>en</strong>tification in reading proceeds from spelling tosound to meaning. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cogn i tion , 14 , 371-385.Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C., Aitchison, C. S., & Podgornik, M. N. (1996). Wh<strong>en</strong> a ROWS is not a R OSE : Null effects in theabs<strong>en</strong>ce of cognitive structures . Manuscript submitted for publication.V<strong>en</strong>ezky, R. L., & Massaro, D. W., (1987). Orthographic structure and spelling-sound regularity in reading Englishwords. In Allport, A., MacKay, D., Prinz, W., Scheerer, E. (Eds.), Language perception and pro<strong>du</strong>ction: Shared mechanism in list<strong>en</strong>ing, speaking, reading and writing . (pp. 158-179), Academic Press.Wagner, R. K., & Torges<strong>en</strong>, J. K. (1987). The nature ofphonological processing and its causal role in the acquisitionof reading skill. Psychological Bulletin, 101 , 192-212.Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German . New York : Oxford University PressWydell, T. N., Butterworth, B., & Patterson, K. (1995). The inconsist<strong>en</strong>cy of consist<strong>en</strong>cy effects in reading : Thecase of Japanese Kanji. Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 ,1155-1168.Ziegler, J. C. (1996). La lecture <strong>en</strong> tant que système de résonance : une approche expérim<strong>en</strong>tale et computationellede l'activation et de la rétroaction phonologique . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Prov<strong>en</strong>ce,<strong>Marseille</strong>, France.Ziegler, J. C. & Jacobs, A. M. (1995). Phonological information provi<strong>des</strong> early sources of constraint in the processingof letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 34 , 567-593.Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bi-directional inconsist<strong>en</strong>cy ofspelling and sound in Fr<strong>en</strong>ch. Behavior Research Methods, Instrum<strong>en</strong>ts, & Computers, 28, 504-515.Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press c). The feedback consist<strong>en</strong>cy effect in Fr<strong>en</strong>ch . Submitted forpublication.Ziegler, J. C., Rey, A., & Jacobs, A. M., (in press d). Quantitative predictions of id<strong>en</strong>tification thresholds and s e -rial error functions : New constraints for models of word recognition. Submitted for publication.Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press a). What's the pronunciation for _OUGH and the spelling for/u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback inconsist<strong>en</strong>cy in English. Behavior Research M e -thods, Instrum<strong>en</strong>ts, & Computers .Ziegler, J. C., Van Ord<strong>en</strong>, G. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press b). Phonology can help or hurt the perception of print.Journal of Experim<strong>en</strong>tal Psychology : H u man Perception and Performance .
- Page 1:
UNIVERSITÉ DE PROVENCE, AIX-MARSEI
- Page 4 and 5:
Ce travail clôt un cycle de format
- Page 6 and 7:
CHAPITRE 7 : LE FUM . . . . . . . .
- Page 8 and 9:
8IntroductionPour cela, notre domai
- Page 10 and 11:
10Introduction• au niveau lexical
- Page 12 and 13:
12Introduction• sa forme visuelle
- Page 14 and 15:
14IntroductionAprès avoir posé le
- Page 16 and 17:
16Méthodologiespulations sur les i
- Page 18 and 19:
18Méthodologies2.1. Protocoles exp
- Page 20 and 21:
20Méthodologiessi le stimulus se t
- Page 22 and 23:
22MéthodologiesCertaines études t
- Page 24 and 25:
24Méthodologiestes, on obtient des
- Page 26 and 27:
26Méthodologies1996 ; Peter & Turv
- Page 28 and 29:
28Méthodologiesles performances da
- Page 30 and 31:
30Méthodologies6 %8%10%15%30%50%80
- Page 32 and 33:
32MéthodologiesMatériel expérime
- Page 34 and 35:
34Méthodologiesentraîne le masqua
- Page 36 and 37:
36MéthodologiesLe même résultat
- Page 38 and 39:
38Méthodologies120100Situation Sta
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapitre 3Orthographe et phonologie
- Page 42 and 43:
42Orthographe et Phonologie3.1. Var
- Page 44 and 45:
44Orthographe et PhonologieLa Figur
- Page 46 and 47:
46Orthographe et PhonologieJacobs,
- Page 48 and 49:
48Orthographe et Phonologiedans la
- Page 50 and 51:
50Orthographe et PhonologieDans l
- Page 52 and 53:
52Orthographe et Phonologieteurs du
- Page 54 and 55:
54Orthographe et PhonologieGoldstei
- Page 56 and 57:
56Orthographe et Phonologietion est
- Page 58 and 59:
58Orthographe et Phonologierand, 19
- Page 60 and 61:
60Orthographe et Phonologieplus ad
- Page 62 and 63:
62Orthographe et Phonologie3.2.3.1.
- Page 64 and 65:
64Orthographe et PhonologiePlus ré
- Page 66 and 67:
66Orthographe et PhonologieUne autr
- Page 68 and 69:
68Orthographe et Phonologiedeux var
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapitre 4Modèles de la perception
- Page 72 and 73:
72Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 74 and 75:
74Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 76 and 77:
76Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 78 and 79:
78Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 80 and 81:
80Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 82 and 83:
82Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 84 and 85:
84Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 86 and 87:
86Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 88 and 89:
88Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 90 and 91:
90Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 92 and 93:
92Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 94 and 95:
94Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 96 and 97:
96Modèles de la perception visuell
- Page 98 and 99:
98MROM-pspécifier leur lien avec l
- Page 100 and 101:
100MROM-pphonèmes reliés par un r
- Page 102 and 103:
102MROM-pLorsque le modèle génèr
- Page 104 and 105:
104MROM-pque ce système artificiel
- Page 106 and 107:
106Unités de la lecturelinguistiqu
- Page 108 and 109:
108Unités de la lecture22606TR (ms
- Page 110 and 111:
110Unités de la lecturemes. Aussi
- Page 112 and 113:
112Unités de la lecturephonologiqu
- Page 114 and 115:
114Unités de la lectureelle-même
- Page 116 and 117:
116Unités de la lecture6.3. Expér
- Page 118 and 119:
118Unités de la lectureRead est qu
- Page 120 and 121:
120Unités de la lectureces modèle
- Page 122 and 123:
122Unités de la lecturechapitre su
- Page 124 and 125:
124FUMmultiples existant au sein de
- Page 126 and 127:
126FUMpar Berndt, Lynne D'Autrechy
- Page 128 and 129:
128FUMcessus de compétition et du
- Page 130 and 131:
130FUMgène et suit les principes c
- Page 132 and 133:
132FUMPseudohomophonesContrôles Or
- Page 134 and 135:
134FUM61023TR (ms) Seidenberg et al
- Page 136 and 137:
136FUMportementaux et les résultat
- Page 138 and 139:
138FUMà une entité extérieure au
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapitre 8Des prédictionsau niveau
- Page 142 and 143:
142Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 144 and 145:
144Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 146 and 147:
146Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 148 and 149:
148Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 150 and 151:
150Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 152 and 153:
152Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 154 and 155:
154Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 156 and 157:
156Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 158 and 159:
158Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 160 and 161:
160Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 162 and 163:
162Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 164 and 165:
164Des prédictions au niveau des m
- Page 166 and 167:
166Les mots polysyllabiquesmots mon
- Page 168 and 169:
168Les mots polysyllabiquesTableau
- Page 170 and 171:
170Les mots polysyllabiques9.2. Exp
- Page 172 and 173:
172Les mots polysyllabiques19001890
- Page 174 and 175:
174Les mots polysyllabiquesnexe XI
- Page 176 and 177:
176Les mots polysyllabiques9.4. Dis
- Page 178 and 179:
178ConclusionConclusion« La grande
- Page 180 and 181:
180Conclusionplutôt un système o
- Page 182 and 183:
182Conclusiontester les prédiction
- Page 184 and 185:
184BibliographieAderman, D., & Smit
- Page 186 and 187:
186BibliographieBrysbaert, M., Vitu
- Page 188 and 189:
188BibliographieFerrand, L., Segui,
- Page 190 and 191:
190BibliographieGrainger, J., & Jac
- Page 192 and 193:
192BibliographieKay, J., & Bishop,
- Page 194 and 195:
194BibliographieMewhort, D. J. K.,
- Page 196 and 197: 196BibliographiePerea, M., & Pollat
- Page 198 and 199: 198BibliographieSeidenberg, M. S.,
- Page 200 and 201: 200BibliographieTreiman, R., & Zuko
- Page 202 and 203: 202AnnexesAnnexes
- Page 204 and 205: 204AnnexesAnnexe II : Temps de rép
- Page 206 and 207: 206AnnexesAnnexe IV : Temps de rép
- Page 208 and 209: 208Annexesd t 88 3 fixed fI%tdd d 3
- Page 210 and 211: 210Annexesoo u 3395 57 too tuoo $ 5
- Page 212 and 213: 212AnnexesAnnexe VI : Liste des 120
- Page 214 and 215: 214AnnexesAnnexe VII : Détail des
- Page 216 and 217: 216AnnexesSujets Stim. Erreur Sujet
- Page 218 and 219: 218AnnexesSujet Moyenne % Err ES Su
- Page 220 and 221: 220AnnexesAnnexe X : Stimuli employ
- Page 222 and 223: 222AnnexesAnnexe XI : Stimuli emplo
- Page 224 and 225: 224Appendice IMROM-P : An interacti
- Page 226 and 227: 226Appendice Ilanguages (French, Ge
- Page 228 and 229: 228Appendice Isummed frequency of f
- Page 230 and 231: 230Appendice IClearly, the ability
- Page 232 and 233: 232Appendice Ito an orthographic le
- Page 234 and 235: 234Appendice IFigure 6 gives an ill
- Page 236 and 237: 236Appendice Iestimator set study,
- Page 238 and 239: 238Appendice ISTEP 3. CRITERION SET
- Page 240 and 241: 240Appendice Iteractive processes o
- Page 242 and 243: 242Appendice INotwithstanding, a no
- Page 244 and 245: 244Appendice I1994). Our stratagem
- Page 248 and 249: 248Appendice IAPPENDIXA1. Cleaning
- Page 250 and 251: 250Appendice IIA phoneme effect in
- Page 252 and 253: 252Appendice IIAs shown in Table 1,
- Page 254 and 255: 254Appendice IImay depend on their
- Page 256 and 257: Appendice III
- Page 258 and 259: 258Appendice IIIHowever, an unsolve
- Page 260 and 261: 260Appendice IIIgrapheme compared t
- Page 262 and 263: 262Appendice IIIRead, J. D. (1983).
- Page 264: 264Appendice IIIAppendix AMean resp