effet du nombre des graphèmes en Anglais - Aix Marseille Université

200BibliographieTreiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1996). Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes, and phonemes. Journalof Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 193-215.Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology,14, 107-141.Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision : inferences from an information processinganalysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1-52.Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 79, 327-352.Underwood, G., Clews, S., Everatt, J. (1990). How do readers know where to look next ? Local informationdistribution influence eye fixations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 39-66.Underwood, G., Roberts, M., & Thomason, H. (1988). Strategical invariance in lexical access : The reappearanceof the pseudohomophone effect. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 24-34.Uttal, W. R. (1990). On some two-way barriers between models and mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics,48, 188-203.Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE : spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15,181-198.Van Orden, G. C. (1991). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys(Eds.), Basic processing in reading : Visual word recognition (pp. 77-103). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spellingto sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14,371-386.Van Orden, G. C., Stone, G. O., Garlington, K. L., Markson, L., R., Pinnt, G. S., Simonfy, C. M., &Brichetto, T. (1992). "Assembled" phonology and reading : A case study in how theoretical perspectiveshapes empirical investigation. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology,and meaning (pp. 249-292). Amsterdam : North-Holland.Venezky, R. L., (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague : Mouton.Venezky, R. L., (1981). Letter-sound regularity and orthographic structure. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.), Directionsin reading research and instructions. Washington, DC : NRC.Véronis, J. (1986). Etude quantitative sur le système graphique et phono-graphique du français. Cahiers dePsychologie Cognitive, 6, 501-531.Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K, & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuoustexts. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 583-600.Voker, J. R., Baker, J. G., Hayman, G., & Jacoby, L. L. (1986). Perceptual identification of visually degradedstimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 1-9.Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special referenceto amnesic patients. Nature, 217, 972-974.Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading : Time course and decisioncriteria. Memory and Cognition, 13, 557-572Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. TheQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439-456.Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,17, 143-154.Wijk, A. (1966). Rules of pronunciation for the English language. Oxford, England : Oxford UniversityPress.Wise, B. W., Olson, R. K., & Treiman, R., 1990. Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction :Onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 49, 1-19.