effet du nombre des graphèmes en Anglais - Aix Marseille Université

198BibliographieSeidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spellingor pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23,383-404.Sejnowski, T. J., & Rosenberg, C. R. (1986). Nettalk : A parallel network that learns to read aloud (EE andCS Techn. Rep. No. JHU/EECS-86/01). Baltimore, MD : Johns Hopkins University.Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syllable. In H. Van der Hulst and N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonologicalrepresentations (Part II). Dortrecht, Holland : Foris.Sereno, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchronyin lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory andCognition, 17, 459-477.Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory & Cognition,25, 425-437.Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1985). Phonological reading : From patterns of impairment to possible procedures.In K. Patterson, J.C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia : Neuropsychologicaland cognitive studies of phonological reading. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.Shallice, T., Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Psychology, 35A, 111-138.Shannon, C. A. (1951). Prediction and entropy of printed English. Bell System Technical Journal, 30, 50-64.Shimron, J., & Navon, D. (1981). The distribution of information within letters. Perception & Psychophysics,30, 483-491.Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading : A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. NewYork : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1-22.Snodgrass, J. G. & Mintzer, M. (1993). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition : Facilitatory orinhibitory? Memory and Cognition, 21, 247-266.Snodgrass, J. G., & Poster, M. (1992). Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names ofthe Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 24,1-15.Sperling, G. (1967). Successive approximations to a model for short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 27,285-292.Spieler, D.H., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the itemlevel. Psychological Science, 8, 411-416.Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology,5, 71-89.Srinivas, K., Roediger, H. L., & Rajaram, S. (1992). The role of syllabic and orthographic properties ofletter cues in solving word fragments. Memory and Cognition, 20, 219-230.Stanhope, N., & Parkin, A. J. (1987). Further explorations of the consistency effect in word and nonwordpronunciation. Memory and Cognition, 15, 169-179.Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading : Some consequences of individual differences in theacquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, XXI, 4, 360-406.Stanovich, K. E. (1987). Perspectives on segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy. Cahiers de PsychologieCognitive / European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 5, 514-519.Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader :The phonological-core variable difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 590-612.